Study on Assessment and Feasibility of Hythane From POME to Improve Power Plant Performance

Authors

  • Joni Prasetyo Chemical Engineering, Pamulang University, Indonesia
  • Era Restu Finalis National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Galuh Wirama Murti National Research and Innovation Agency
  • S.D. Sumbogo Murti National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Nesha Adelia National Research and Innovation Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v16i1.5260

Keywords:

POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent), Hythane, Hydrogen Methane, Economic Analysis, Cascading Fermentation

Abstract

Biogas power plant from POME is getting trendier because Indonesia is the largest palm oil producer in the world as the amount of palm oil production produces more POME and has a high COD. COD is commonly used as a base stoichiometry calculation for CH4 conversion. Correction on COD conversion for biogas production was done by considering CO2 rather than CH4 only. Combining H2 with CH4 is a worthy breakthrough because it can increase by 15% of electricity output. Such H2 and CH4 mixing has some advantages on the unique combustion property of H2 in CH4 (hythane). Economic analysis comparison on this mixing of biogas and conventional biogas was assessed to see the improvement because of an increase in LHV value in biogas. Based on previous experiments conducted by cascading H2 and followed by CH4 production, with an H2 in CH4 ratio of 1:3, an economic analysis was calculated according to an industry capacity of 60 tonnes FFB/hour. A previous biogas power plant needed an investment of $1,502,000 for 1.35 MWe, but $400,000 was later invested for 1.59 MWe by hythane, increasing 15%. The investment performance of this power plant gave IRR 43.96%, 9.95% higher, and low BEP, 34%. The biogas power plant is economically safe, does not suffer from losses even produces only 34% capacity. The payback period was 2.6 years, seven months shorter. In conclusion, an additional one bioreactor on the existing power plant is economically feasible.

 

References

Max Roser, Hannah Ritchie, and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, 2013, World Population Growth, Our World In Data.org, https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth.

Gerber, P. J., H. Steinfeld, B. Henderson, A. Mottet, C. Opio, J. Dijkman, A. Falcucci, and G. Tempio, 2013, Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities, Rome: FAO.

Reijnders, L., Huijbregts, M.A.J., 2008, Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, iss. 4, 2008, pp. 477-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.054

IPCC, 2013, Summary for policymakers, In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge (UK) / New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 1535.

Singh, L., M. F. Siddiqui, A. Ahmad, M. H. A Rahim dan Z. A. Wahid, 2012, Biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent using immobilized mixed culture, Jour. Ind. and Eng. Chem., 19.659–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.10.001

Bockris, J. O. M., 2002, The origin of ideas on a Hydrogen Economy and its solution to the decay of the environment, Intern. Jour. Hydrogen Energy, 27, 731–740. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00154-9

M. Prussi, M.Padella, M.Conton, E.D. Postma, L.Lonza., 2019, Review of technologies for biomethane production and assessment of Eu transport share in 2030, Journal of Cleaner Production 222: 565-572.

Madaki Y.S., and Seng L., 2013, Palm oil mill effluent (POME) from Malaysia palm oil mills: Waste or resource, Intern. Jour. Sci., Env. and Tech., 2 (6), 1138 – 55. ISSN 2278-3687

Stacy C. Davis and Robert G. Boundy, 2020, Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 38, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Transportation Research Center.

Joni Prasetyo, et. al., 2018, Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) utilization for bio-hydrogen production targeting for biofuel : optimization and scale up, 3rd i-TREC 2018, E3S Web of Conferences 67, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186702003.

Li YC, et.al., 2012, Techno-economic evaluation of biohydrogen production from wastewater and agricultural waste, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(20): 15704–15710, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.043.

Sinnot, R. and Towler, G. 2009, Chemical Engineering Design, 5th Ed, p.359, Burlington

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2014, Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah,

Lembaga Pendidikan Perkebunan, 2014, Laporan Studi Kelayakan PLTBG PKS SEI INTAN, Kampus Yogyakarta.

Thomas Wallner, Henry K. Ng, and Robert W. Peters, 2007, The effects of blending hydrogen with methane on engine operation, efficiency, and emissions, SAE International, 2007-01-0474.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 Tahun 2012 pada 12 Maret 2012.

Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource (MEMR), 2015, Handbook of Energy and Economics Statistic Indonesia 2015, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

07-09-2023

How to Cite

Prasetyo, J., Finalis, E. R., Murti, G. W., Murti, S. S., & Adelia, N. (2023). Study on Assessment and Feasibility of Hythane From POME to Improve Power Plant Performance. Majalah Ilmiah Pengkajian Industri; Journal of Industrial Research and Innovation, 16(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v16i1.5260