Chip Formation Analysis of the Turning of ST41 Steel

Authors

  • Rieza Zulrian Aldio Department of Mechanical Engineering Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Muhyi Wahid Saputra Department of Mechanical Engineering Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Dedikarni Department of Mechanical Engineering Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v16i3.5565

Keywords:

Chip formation, Chip thickness, Cutting angle, Turning

Abstract

ST41 steel is commonly used for the shaft of ships. The shaft tends to corrode due to the interaction with the water. To recycle the used ST41, welding is normally done to repair the damaged or rusted surface of the shaft. The turning process is then conducted to obtain a better surface finish. This research used three types of cutting tools with different geometry at their cutting angle of  80, 85, 90. The chips from the turning process are collected and observed. Chip formation will indicate the quality of the turning process. The chip thickness and formation are observed to determine the effect of the cutting angle on the machining quality. The chip thickness value ranges between 0.13 mm to 0.3 mm, with a cutting angle of 900 producing the thinnest chips and 850 producing the thickest chips. Thicker chips indicate higher cutting force that leads to the wear of cutting tools. The cutting angle also affects obtained the chip formation. Several shapes are obtained, such as long continuous, medium, and short discontinuous shapes. A longer chip means a better process with less chatter on the cutting process. Long continuous chips are dominantly found by using 900 cutting tool. The other two angles are dominated by the discontinuous chips, with a slightly medium length of chips majorly found at 800 and short discontinuous chips recovered using an 850 cutting tool. From this research, it could be known that a 900 cutting angle will produce thinner and better chip formation.

References

M. Mia, and N.R. Dhar. Effects of duplex jets high-pressure coolant on machining temperature and machinability of Ti-6Al-4V superalloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 252 2018: 688-696.

R.Z. Aldio, Dedikarni, B. Saputra, I. Anwar and M.S. Masdar. Effect Of Spraying and Mesh Size on Surface Roughness of SS400 Steel Sandblasting Process. Journal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics 4. 2021.

C. Darshan, S. Jain, M. Dogra, M.K. Gupta, M. Mia, and R. Haque. Influence of Dry and Solid Lubricant-Assisted MQL Cooling Conditions on the Machinability of Inconel 718 Alloy with Textured Tool. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105 2019: 1835-1849.

M. S. Pradhana, S. Singha, C. Prakasha, G. Krolczykb, A. Pramanikc, C. I. Pruncu, Investigation of Machining Characteristics of Hard-to-Machine Ti-6Al-4VELI Alloy for Biomedical Applications. J. Mater. Res. Technol.8 2019: 4849–4862.

Z. Kunpeng and Z. Yu. A Generic Tool Wear Model and Its Application to Force Modeling and Wear Monitoring in High-Speed Milling. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 115 2019:147-161.

W. Grzesik, P. Niesony, W. Habrat, J. Sieniawski and P. Laskowski. Investigation of Tool Wear in the Turning of Inconel 718 Superalloy in Terms of Process Performance and Productivity Enhancement. Tribol. Int. 118 2018:337–346.

R.Z. Aldio and Z. Mustafa. Drill Bit Selection Using Design of Experiments (DoE) Method. Journal of Renewable Energy and Mechanics 3 2020: 39-43.

B. Toubhans, G. Fromentin, F. Viprey, H. Karaouni, and T. Dorlin. Machinability of inconel 718 during turning: Cutting force model considering tool wear, influence on surface integrity. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 285 2020: 116809.

J.M. Rodrguez, J. M. Carbonell and P. Jonsen. Numerical Methods for the Modelling of Chip Formation." Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 27 2020: 387-412.

M. Kuntoglu, A. Aslan, D.Y. Pimenov, U.A. Usca, E. Salur, M.K. Gupta, T. Mikolajcyk, K. Giasin, W. Kaplonek and S. Sharma. A Review of Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Systems and Decision-Making Methods in Turning: Critical Analysis and Trends. Sensors 21 2020: 108.

M.R. Munhoz, L.G. Dias, R. Breganon, F.S.F. Ribeiro, J.F. Goncalves, E.M. Hashimoto and C.E. Junior. Analysis of the Surface Roughness Obtained by the Abrasive Flow Machining Process Using an Abrasive Paste with Oiticica Oil. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106 2020.

Downloads

Published

13-09-2023

How to Cite

Aldio, R. Z., Saputra, M. W., & Dedikarni. (2023). Chip Formation Analysis of the Turning of ST41 Steel. Majalah Ilmiah Pengkajian Industri; Journal of Industrial Research and Innovation, 16(3), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v16i3.5565