THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAILWAY BRIDGE DESIGN LOAD BETWEEN PM 60/2012 AND EN 1991: 2-2003

Authors

  • Willy Barasa Center of Technology for Transportation System and Infrastructure Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
  • Thiya Fiantika Center of Technology for Transportation System and Infrastructure Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
  • Dwi Agus Purnomo Center of Technology for Transportation System and Infrastructure Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
  • Wimpie Agoeng Noegroho Aspar Center of Technology for Transportation System and Infrastructure Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v14i2.4196

Keywords:

PM 60 of 2012, EN1991:2-2003, SAP2000, Normal Field, Shear Field, Moment Field, Deflection

Abstract

In Referring to the government programs on the increasing speed of the Jakarta-Surabaya express train in 2017, problems arise in the field, namely the potential increase in freight transportation via the railway line where an increase in loading is required on the railway especially for the existing bridge. This Research was implemented by increasing of the loading of the standard PM 60/2012 bridge to be compared with the EN1991: 2/2003 standard. This research analyzed the increase in structural strength of the 30m span steel bridge of the BH 182 constructed in Operational Region 2 Bandung as a results of loading adjustment from PM 60/2012 to EN 1991:2/2003.This paper explained an effect caused by increasing load on railway bridges with similar span and materials on normal plane, shear plane, moment and deflection. Structural analysis and calculation was performed by means of SAP2000 software. Results of analysis showed that standard equalization of EN 1991:2/2003 caused increasing percentage of loading combination of Comb L, normal plane, shear plane, moment plane, and deflection are of 35%, 60%, 71%, and 31%, respectively. While for Comb R loading combination for normal plane, shear plane, moment plane, and deflection are of 30%, 64%, 71%, and 30%, respectively.

References

Nasution M Nur, Transportation Management, Second Edition, Publisher: Ghalia Indonesia 2004.

Gitgita, What is the History of Railway in Indonesia, http://sejarahunik.net/ sejarah/bagaimana-sejarah-kereta-api-indonesia.html., posted at Januari 13, 2018,

Directorate General of Railway – Ministry of Transportation, National Railway Master Plan, April 11, 2011.

Rosyidi, SAP, 2015, Rekayasa Jalan Kereta Api (Tinjauan Struktur Jalan Rel), Yogyakarta, Penerbit Lembaga Penelitian, Publikasi dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammdiyah Yogyakarta (LP3M UMY).

Muspitasari, Tri., Sulistyowati, Indah., Kumara, Widi, Evaluasi Peraturan Pembebanan Gandar Kereta Api di Pulau Jawa Terhadap Kondisi Aktual, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Vol.14, No. 13, 2017.

Minister of Transportation Regulation No. 60 of 2012 Railway Technical Requirements.

European Standard 1991:2 (2003). Traffic Loads on Bridge. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels. Belgia.

Purnomo, Dwi Agus., Utomo, D. P., Waseso, A. B., and Marindaa, M., Analysis of Railway Bridge Model for I Girder Type and Warren Truss Type Journal of Industrial Technology Assessments, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 47-58. 2020.

SAP2000(R), 1997 Integrated Finite Elements Analysis and Design Of Structures, TUTORIAL MANUAL, Version 6.1, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.

Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) 1725:2016, ICS 93.040, Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), 2016, tentang Pembebanan untuk Jembatan.

Downloads

Published

13-09-2023

How to Cite

Barasa, W., Fiantika, T., Purnomo, D. A., & Aspar, W. A. N. (2023). THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAILWAY BRIDGE DESIGN LOAD BETWEEN PM 60/2012 AND EN 1991: 2-2003. Majalah Ilmiah Pengkajian Industri; Journal of Industrial Research and Innovation, 14(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v14i2.4196