Ikonografi Dan Makna Penggambaran Arca Gaṇeśa Ekapāda Koleksi Museum Nasional Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
Among more than 160 Gaṇeśa statues found in Indonesia, only one is depicted in a standing position on one leg. Based on the positional form, this Gaṇeśa statue with inventory number 198 of the National Museum of Indonesia collection can be referred to as Gaṇeśa ekapāda. Several previous studies have shown differences of opinion in identifying the depiction. This study attempts to clearly identify the depiction and meaning of Gaṇeśa ekapāda by using iconographic and semiotic approaches. In the iconographic analysis, the statue is described based on its distinctive attributes and positional form. The depiction is then compared with ancient Hindu texts and with other Hindu-Buddhist statues and reliefs. The ekapāda position more closely depicts a form of severe austerities. From Peirce's semiotic perspective, this statue functions as a sign that has two main referents through icon and index associations. The resulting layers of meaning show that this statue has a complex symbolic meaning. The statue of Gaṇeśa ekapāda can be interpreted to represent Gaṇeśa as the giver of boons to his followers who practice discipline and perseverance in worship. In addition, this study also explores the relation of this statue to the social and religious dynamics in ancient Javanese society.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Acri, Andrea. 2010. “On birds, ascetics, and kings in Central Java Rāmāyana Kakawin, 24.95–126 and 25.” Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 166 (4): 475–506. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003611.
———. 2020. “Yoga and meditation traditions in insular Southeast Asia.” Dalam Routledge Handbook of Yoga and Meditation Studies, disunting oleh Suzanne Newcombe dan Karen O’Brien-Kop, 1 ed., 273–90. London: Routledge.
Adi, Ari Mukti. 2020. “Tracking the Locations of Hindu - Buddhist Archaeological Remains in Magelang Region Based on ROD 1914 and GIS Approach.” Berkala Arkeologi 40 (1): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v40i1.508.
Akbar, Ali. 2017. “Reconstruction of an Indigenous Community‘s Belief in Dragon; Research on Prehistoric Batu Naga Site in Kuningan, West Java.” Wacana 18 (3): 614. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v18i3.630.
Alnoza, M. 2021. Makna Artefak Masa Hindu-Buddha di Keraton Kasepuhan Cirebon: Tinjauan Semiotika Peirce. Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala 24 (2): 107–120.
Ashari, Chaidir. 2015. “Makna Candi Pendharmaan Zaman Singhasari-Majapahit (Abad Ke-13--15 M): Kajian Semiotika.” Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.
Bagus, A. A. Gde. 2015. “Arca Ganesa Bertangan Delapan Belas di Pura Pingit Melamba Bunutin, Kintamani, Bangli.” Forum Arkeologi 28 (1): 25–34.
BG. 1877. “Notulen van de Algemeene en Bestuurs-vergaderingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen Deel XIV-1876.” Batavia.
Bhagat, M. G. 1976. Ancient Indian Asceticism. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
Bhikkhu, Ānandajoti. 2019. Gaṇḍavyūha, Pencarian Kecerahan. Disunting oleh Handaka Vijjānanda. Jakarta: Ehipassiko Foundation.
Buhnemann, Gudrun. 2008. Tantric Forms of Ganesa According to the Vidyarnavatantra. 1 ed. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd.
de Casparis, J. G. 1956. Selected Inscriptions from the 7th to the 9th Century A.D. Vol. II. Bandung: Masa Baru.
Fontein, Jan. 2012. Entering the Dharmadhātu: A Study of the Gandavyūha Reliefs of Borobudur. Studies in Asian Art and Archaeology, v. 26. Leiden: Brill.
Gangakhedkar, Narendra. 2020. “Poetry in Stones: Halebidu, Karnataka.” 28 Januari 2020. https://manurutu.blogspot.com/2020/01/poetry-in-stones-halebidu-karnataka.html.
Getty, Alice. 1971. Ganesa: A Monograph on the Elephant-Faced God. 2 ed. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Groeneveldt, W. P., dan J. L. A Brandes. 1887. Catalogus der Archeoligische Verzameling van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen. Batavia: Albrecht & Co.
Guy, John. 2014. Lost Kingdoms: Hindu-Buddhist Sculpture of Early Southeast Asia. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of art.
Harriyadi. 2019. “Pertimbangan Pemilihan Lokasi Kompleks Candi Dieng.” AMERTA 37 (2): 123–38.
Hoed, Benny H. 2014. Semiotik Dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. 3rd ed. Komunitas Bambu.
Hopkins, E. Washburn. 1901. “Yoga-Technique in the Great Epic.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 22:333. https://doi.org/10.2307/592436.
Iskandar. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Krishan, Y. 1981. “The Origins of Ganesa.” Artibus Asiae 43 (4): 285. https://doi.org/10.2307/3249845.
Krom, N. J. 1911. Rapporten van de Commissie in Nederlandsch-Indie voor Oudheidkundig Onderzoek op Java en Madoera. Batavia: Albrecht & Co. http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:3504687.
Kusen. 1994. “Raja-raja Mataram Kuna dari Sanjaya Sampai Balitung Sebuah Rekonstruksi Berdasarkan Prasasti Wanua Tengah III.” Berkala Arkeologi 14 (2): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v14i2.721.
Kuswanto. 2017. Relief Cerita Bersifat Hindu di Candi Jago Kabupaten Malang. Disunting oleh Nuraini Eko Rahayu dan Missa Demettawati. Mojokerto: Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Jawa Timur.
Lee, So Tju Shinta. 2021. “Ajaran Paramita Pada Relief Jatakamala Di Candi Borobudur: Perspektif Semiotika.” Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.
Lee, So Tju Shinta, dan Agus Aris Munandar. 2022. Pemaknaan ajaran paramita pada relief Jatakamala di Candi Borobudur: Perspektif semiotika. Berkala Arkeologi 42 (1): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v42i2.963
Liebert. 1976. Iconographic Dictionary of the Indian Religions. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004646469.
Mallinson, James. 2011. “Śāktism and Haṭhayoga.” Dalam OCHS Conference: The Śākta Traditions. Oxford.
———. 2020. “Yoga: Haṭha Yoga.” Dalam Brill’s Encyclopedia of Hinduism Online. Vol. 3. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/2212-5019_BEH_COM_000354.
———. t.t. “Yogic Identities: Tradition and Transformation.” The Smithsonian’s National Museum of Asian Art. Diakses 22 Mei 2025. https://asia-archive.si.edu/essays/yogic-identities/.
Meyanti, Lisda, Radila Adwina, Harriyadi, Dimas Nugroho, Hikmana Arafah Wiryandara, dan Ni Kadek Sri Sumiartini. 2024. “Sakral dan Profan: Pandangan Masyarakat Jawa Kuno Terhadap Peran serta Fungsi Hutan Berdasarkan Prasasti dan Relief.” WALENNAE: Jurnal Arkeologi Sulawesi 22 (2): 141–62.
Munandar, Agus Aris. 2003. “Mengungkap Data, Menafsir Makna: Kajian Artefak sebagai Tanda (Sign).” Depok.
———. 2004. Karya Sastra Jawa Kuno yang Diabadikan pada Relief Candi-Candi Abad ke-13-15 M. Makara, Sosial Humaniora 8 (2): 54–60.
———. 2016a. “Principles of Proxemic in Locating and Observing of Narrative Reliefs Panel of the Temples 8-10 Centuries AD: An Observation on Narrative Reliefs on Borobudur Temple.” In Hitawasana, Studies on Indonesian Archaeology. Wedatama Widya Sastra.
———. 2016b. “Revealing the Meaning of Some Sriwijaya Inscriptions, the Study of Semiotics.” In Hitawasana, Studies on Indonesian Archaeology. Wedatama Widya Sastra.
———. 2019. “Bentuk-Bentuk Prasasti Batu: Upaya Interpretasi Pemaknaan.” In Kalpalata: Data Dan Interpretasi Arkeologi. Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Murdihastomo, Ashar. 2019. “Identifikasi Arca Tokoh Berkepala Singa di Museum Penataran.” Berkala Arkeologi 39 (1): 33–52. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v39i1.334.
———. 2020a. “Ganesha Tanpa Mahkota dalam Pusaran Religi Masyarakat Jawa Kuna (Sebuah Kajian Permulaan).” KALPATARU 29 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24832/kpt.v29i1.700.
———. 2020b. “The Depiction of Snake Ornament on Ganesha Statue in the Collection of Prambanan Temple Museum, Yogyakarta.” Berkala Arkeologi 40 (1): 63–78. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v40i1.477.
Nastiti, Titi Surti, Churmatin Nasoichah, Andri Restyadi, Hedwi Prihatmoko, Arlo Griffiths, Wayan Jarrah Sastrawan, Adeline Levivier, dan Tyassanti Kusumo Dewanti. 2024. Survei Prasasti Zaman Hindu-Buddha di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dan Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Tahun 2023. Jakarta: KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).
Nöth, Winfried. 1995. Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
O’Connor, Stanley J. 1985. “Metallurgy and Immortality at Caṇḍi Sukuh, Central Java.” Indonesia 39 (April):52. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350986.
Padoux, Andre, dan Roger-Orphe Jeanty. 2013. The Heart of the Yogini. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982325.001.0001.
Permata, Nabila Mega, Agus Aris Munandar, dan Evan Gavriel Harazaki. 2022. Makna Atribut Istimewa pada Arca Perwujudan Tokoh-tokoh Perempuan Majapahit: Kajian Arkeologi Religi Hindu-Buddha. Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage 11 (2): 136–170. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v11i2.662.
Preucel, Robert W. 2006. Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell Publishing.
Rahardjo, Supratikno. 2001. “Peradaban Jawa Abad ke-8 sampai dengan Abad ke-15: Sebuah Kajian tentang Dinamika Pranata-Pranata Politik, Agama, dan Ekonomi.” Disertasi, Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Rao, T. A. Gopinatha. 1914. Elements of Hindu Iconography. Vol. 1. Madras: The Law Printing House.
———. 1916. Elements of Hindu Iconography. Vol. 2. Madras: The Law Printing House.
Redig, I Wayan. 1992. “A comparative study of Ganesa images from India and Indonesia (from Circa 7th to 15th century A.D.).” Thesis, Chandigarh: Panjab University.
Rema, Nyoman. 2018. “Arca Ganeśa dalam Sikap Swastikàsana.” Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala 17 (2): 155. https://doi.org/10.24832/bas.v17i2.83.
Roy, Pratap Chandra. 1884a. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 2 ed. Vol. 1. Calcutta: Dhirendra Nath Bose.
———. 1884b. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 2 ed. Vol. 3. Calcutta: Dhirendra Nath Bose.
———. 1884c. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 2 ed. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Dhirendra Nath Bose.
———. 1891. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 2 ed. Vol. 10. Calcutta: Dhirendra Nath Bose.
Sedyawati, Edi. 1985. “Pengarcaan Ganesa Masa Kadiri dan Singhasari: Sebuah Tinjauan Sejarah Kesenian.” Disertasi, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Sukendar, Haris. 1999. Metode Penelitian Arkeologi. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.
Tejowasono, Ninny Susanti. 2003. “Airlangga, Raja Pembaharu di Jawa pada Abad ke-11 Masehi.” Disertasi, Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Trigangga, F. Wardhani, dan D. Retno W. 2015. Prasasti dan Raja-Raja Nusantara. Disunting oleh Dedah F. Sri Handari. Jakarta: Museum Nasional Indonesia, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Winaya, Atina. 2023. “Ganesa Menari.” Dalam Tribut untuk Prof. Dr. Edi Sedyawati: Dari Ganesa Sampai Tari, 312–25. Borobudur Writers and Cultural Society.
Wirasanti, Niken. 2023. Candi dan Lingkungan Abad IX-X Masehi di Wilayah Jawa Bagian Tengah. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Yusuf, Muhamad Satok. 2021. “Ganesa sebagai Dewa Kebencanaan di Blitar.” Prosiding Balai Arkeologi Jawa Barat, Oktober, 415–25. https://doi.org/10.24164/prosiding.v4i1.37.