Situs Sakral Sebagai Pusat Kosmos: Analisis Kepercayaan Masyarakat Kampung Pitu, Nglanggeran, Gunung Kidul Dalam Perspektif Teori Sakral-Profan Mircea Eliade
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to understand how the beliefs and sacred sites of the Pitu Village community are analyzed through Mircea Eliade's theory. This study is qualitative, utilizing mixed interviews, observation, and documentation. The results indicate that the concept of the sacred in the beliefs of the Pitu Village community has been present since the community was formed. The Kinah Gadung Wulung tree and Telogo Guyangan become hierophanies. Sacred rituals are focused on the pond, which is believed to be a place of efficacy. The cosmos manifested in the Pitu Village community also serves as the axis mundi for the community, located at Telaga Guyangan. Ancestral teachings serve as a blueprint to protect them from chaos, including the prohibition on the number of family cards, which must total seven, forming the basis for the village structure and representing an imago mundi. Pitu Village is distinct in its presence of ancestors and elders as elements of the Sacred, receiving special rituals and becoming axis mundi takes the form of a human because in the life of the Kampung Pitu community, they must firmly hold on to their teachings and seek advice when they want to carry out something.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Abimanyu. 2021. Ilmu Mistik Kejawen. Yogyakarta: Noktah.
Andari, Rini, Yeni Yuniawati, and Gitasiswhara. 2023. “Local Wisdom Value: Promoting and Branding Tourism Village.” In , 505–13. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-096-1_56.
Arianti, Mariata, Putri Aulia Netra, Rahmita Astari, and Sonny Yuliar. 2024. “Rural Transformation of Nglanggeran through Ecotourism: A Socio-Technical Approach.” Jurnal Sosioteknologi 23 (2): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2024.23.2.4.
Beger, Peter. 1991. Sacred Canopy. Jakarta: EP3ES.
Dhavamony, Mariasusaic. 1995. Fenomenologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Emzir. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
———. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis Data. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Gabriella, Fenika, Nikita Rasyidin, Roxanne Roxanne, and Rizaldi Parani. 2023. “Eksplorasi Nilai Budaya Melukat Dalam Pariwisata Berkelanjutkan, Perspektif Komunikasi.” JKOMDIS : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Media Sosial 3 (3): 730–33. https://doi.org/10.47233/jkomdis.v3i3.1248.
Geertz, Clifford. 2014. Agama Jawa: Abangan, Santri, Dan Priyayi Dalam Kebudayaan Jawa. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.
Haryanto, Sindung. 2016. Sosiologi Agama Dari Klasik Hingga Post Modern. Malang: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Husniyah, Jihan Fitri, Sefila Nesya Dewanti, and Siti Nur Cahyani. 2024. “Evaluasi Penerapan Eco-Label Dalam Pengembangan Ekowisata Di Desa Wisata Nglanggeran, Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Nasional Pariwisata 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jnp.92781.
Insani, A.A., R.L. Ningsih, A.C. Murtidewi, R. Silvyana, D. Pasaribu, and R.F. Putri. 2023. “Aesthetic and Cultural Value of Nglanggeran Ancient Volcano Geoheritage: A Cultural Geomorphology Perspective.” Edited by R. Che Omar, J.T. Sri Sumantyo, B. White, F.C. Ballesteros, and A. Cardenas Tristan. E3S Web of Conferences 468 (December): 05001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346805001.
Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli, and Deslaely Putranti. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Dan Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Kampung Pitu.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 15 (2): 231. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.231-256.
Jamalina, Ismi Atikah, and Dyah Titis Kusuma Wardani. 2017. “Strategi Pengembangan Ekowisata Melalui Konsep Community Based Tourism (Cbt) Dan Manfaat Sosial Dan Ekonomi Bagi Masyarakat Di Desa Wisata Nglanggeran, Patuk, Gunung Kidul.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.18.1.4008.
Johnson, Doyle Paul. 1981. Sociological Theory Classical Founders and Contemporary Edition. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kurtz, Lester R. 1995. Gods in The Global Village: The World’s Religions in Sociological Perspective. New Delhi: Pine Forge Press.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1948. Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. International Affairs. Vol. 24. Illinois: The Free Press Printed. https://doi.org/10.2307/3017623.
Manik, Venny Kartika, and Djuara P Lubis. 2021. “Partisipasi Dan Perubahan Kesejahteraan Anggota Kelompok Sadar Wisata Dalam Pengelolaan Desa Wisata Nglanggeran, Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat [JSKPM] 5 (4): 484–95. https://doi.org/10.29244/jskpm.v5i4.861.
Mircea, Eliade. 1987. Sacred and The Propane The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Narendro, Joko. 2016. “Kayu Kinah Gadung Wulung Pusaka Kraton, Orang Mati Suri Di Olesi Minyak Cahyo Hidup Kembali.” PASTVNews.Com. 2016. http://www.pastvnews.com/lintas-sosial/kayu-kinah-gadung-wulung-pusaka-kraton-orang-mati-suri-di-olesi-minyak-cahyo-hidup-kembali.html.
Nuraini Sekarsih, Fitria. 2022. “Kematian Yang Ditolak Di Kampung Pitu, Nglanggeran, Patuk, Gunungkidul.” DEMOS: Journal of Demography, Ethnography and Social Transformation 2 (1): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.30631/demos.v2i1.1288.
Nuri, Annisa Nada, Vania Azra Erina, Ferdian Dwi Saputra, and An’cahya Titin Nafisa. 2025. “Dampak Kepengurusan Ganda Pokdarwis: Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Nglanggeran.” Jurnal Nasional Pariwisata 15 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.22146/jnp.102920.
Pals, Daniel L. 2003. Dekontruksi Kebenaran. Yogyakarta: IrciSod.
———. 2015. Nine Theories Of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Purnama, Bambang Suta, Theresiana Ani Larasati, and Ambar Andrianto. 2019. Komunitas Kampung Pitu. Yogyakarta: Balai Pelestarian Nilai Budaya DIY Yogyakarta.
Purwanto, Yohanes. 2022. “Sacred Forests, Sacred Natural Sites, Territorial Ownership, and Indigenous Community Conservation in Indonesia.” In Sacred Forests of Asia, 261–76. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003143680-24.
Putri, Dwiani Intan Kartika. 2023. “Perubahan Tipologi Fasad Pada Rumah Tradisional Kampung Pitu Gunung Kidul.” Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE 7 (1): 108. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v7i1.1250.
Ristiawan, Rucitarahma, and Guillaume Tiberghien. 2021. “A Critical Assessment of Community-Based Tourism Practices in Nglanggeran Ecotourism Village, Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies 9 (1): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitode.2021.009.01.04.
Rofiq, Muhammad Rozzaq. 2022. “Legenda Kampung Pitu.” Gunungapipurba.Com. 2022. http://gunungapipurba.com/posts/detail/legenda-kampung-pitu.
Selo, Soemardjan. 2009. Perubahan Sosial Di Yogyakarta. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.
Setiawan, Andereas Pandu. 2021a. “Entitas Rumah Ekologi Masyarakat Kampung Pitu.” Universitas Kristen Petra. 2021. https://repository.petra.ac.id/19739/.
———. 2021b. “Tingalan A Tradition of Kampung Pitu Patuk Gunung Kidul Yogyakarta.” ICADECS.
Sugiarto, Eko, and Angesti Palupiningsih. 2019. “Identifikasi Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Tarik Wisata Di Kawasan Ekowisata Gunung Api Purba.” Kepariwisataan: Jurnal Ilmiah 13 (2).
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suminar, Ratna Eka, Sudaryono Sastrosasmito, and Doddy Aditya Iskandar. 2023. “Rural Identity and Its Roles in Boosting Local Economic Sustainability in Nglanggeran Village of Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Kawistara 13 (3): 357. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.78471.
Supriadi, Muhammad Roy Purwanto, and Putri Jannatur Rahmah. 2021. “A Study on Nglanggeran Kampung Pitu: Sociologically and Anthropologically Perspectives.” IDEAS 7 (4).
Suta Purwana, Bambang H. 2020. “Komoditifikasi Budaya Tradisional Komunitas Kampung Pitu Di Gunung Kidul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Kebudayaan 15 (1): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.24832/jk.v15i1.341.
Titah. 2019. “Kampung Nglanggeran Gunung Kidul Berbahaya.” Vice.Com. 2019. https://www.vice.com/id/article/ zmpkxe/kampung-pitu-nglanggeran-gunung-kidul-berbahaya.
Turner, Victor. 1966. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Cornel University Press.
Utami, Dyah Ayu Putri, and Ari Kusmiatun. 2021. “Eksplorasi Folklor Kampung Pitu Nglanggeran (Kajian Sastra Dengan Pendekatan Pariwisata).” Widyaparwa 49 (2): 429–41. https://doi.org/10.26499/wdprw.v49i2.794.
Vitrianto, Primantoro N. 2023. “Local Wisdom and Tourism Development in Kampung Nglanggeran, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta.” International Journal of Applied Sciences in Tourism and Events 7 (1): 46–60. https://doi.org/10.31940/ijaste.v7i1.46-60.
Weber, Max. 2008. The Elementary Forms Of The Religious Life. london: Dover Publication.
Zainal, Asliah. 2014. “Sakral Dan Profan Dalam Ritual Life Cyrcle: Memperbincangkan Fungsionalisme Emile Durkheim.” Al-Izzah 9 (1): 61–70.