Tata Pamer Museum Negeri Pada Masa Lalu Dan Masa Kini: Studi Museum Nasional Indonesia dan Museum Sonobudoyo
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The museum is a dynamic institution and always developed according to its time. The development of the museum is intended so that the museum can always be accepted by the public. The display system of the museum is referred to as one of the most visible parts of the development of the museum because it has a crucial value and can be an indication of the condition of society at that time. Indonesia had experienced at least three periods of development, namely the colonial period, the independence period, and the post-reformation period (present). This question aims to see the compatibility between the participation of the museum and the development of the community. This article used two data, primary and secondary data. The primary data were obtained from direct observation, while secondary data was derived from a literature study. The data is then described, comparatively explanatively analyzed, and then interpreted. The results of the interpretation are then used to answer the questions posed. The conclusion obtained is that the exhibition system in the colonial period was associated with efforts to study Indonesian cultural objects, the exhibition system during the independence period was intended to spread the nation's ideology, and the post-reformation period emphasized the social role of museums to society.
Keywords: museum; colonial; independence; post-reformation
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ahmad, Shamsidar, Mohamed Yusoff Abbas, Mohd. Zafrullah Mohd. Taib, and Mawar Masri. 2014. “Museum Exhibition Design: Communication of Meaning and the Shaping of Knowledge.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 153: 254–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.059.
Bennett, Tony. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge.
Brstilo, Ivana, and Željka Jelavić. 2010. “Culture as a Field of Possibilities : Museum as a Means of Social Integration,” 161–73.
Dean, David. 1997. Museum Exhibition: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. 2007. Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, and Performance. London and New York: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean, Richard Sandell, Theano Moussouri, and Helen O’Riain. 2000. “Museums and Social Inclusion.” The GLLAM Report, 59.
Karayilanoglu, Gamze & Arabacioglu, Burcin Ce. 2016. “The ‘New’ Museum Comprehension: ‘Inclusive Museum.’” In 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Architecture and Interior Design, 84–89. Zagreb: Megaron Journal.
lEstoile, Benot de. 2003. “From the Colonial Exhibition to the Museum of Man. An Alternative Genealogy of French Anthropology.” Social Anthropology 11 (3): 341–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0964028203000247.
Mensch, Peter van; Mensch, Leontine Meijer van. 2011. New Trends in Museology. Celje: Museum of Recent History.
Montien, Hatairat. 2019. “New Museology in Practice: A Case Study of Baan Hollanda - an Information Center of Thai-Dutch Relation in Ayutthaya”. Journal of Sociology and Antrhropology 38 (1): 10–28.
Museum Nasional Indonesia. n.d. “About the Museum Nasional.” https://www.museumnasional.or.id/tentang-kami.
Museum Sonobudoyo Yogyakarta. n.d. “Sejarah.” https://www.sonobudoyo.com/id/museum/sejarah.
Purwoko. 1981. Koleksi Museum Negeri Sonobudoyo Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Proyek Rehabilitasi dan Perluasan Museum Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Sauvage, Alexandra. 2010. “To Be or Not to Be Colonial: Museums Facing Their Exhibitions.” Culturales 6 (12): 97–116.
Smeds, Kerstin. 2012. “On the Meaning of Exhibitions–Exhibition Epistèmes in a Historical Perspective”. Designs for Learning 5 (1–2): 50–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/dfl-2014-0004.
Stebbins, Theodore E, Julia Brown Turrell, Jay E Cantor, and John Walsh. 1991. “The Museum ’ s Collection”. In The Economics of Art Museums, edited by Martin Feldstein, 13–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sutaarga, Moh. Amir. 1998. “Pedoman Penyelenggaraan dan Pengelolaan Museum.” Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan Proyek Pembinaan Permuseuman Jakarta 1997/1998 4: 106.
tanpa nama. 2021. “Prehistorische afdeling van het Museum van het Koninklijk Bataviaasch Genootschap voor Kunsten en Wetenschappen te Batavia.” Digital Collections. Leiden University Libraries Digital Collections (blog). 2021. https://digitalcollections.universiteitleiden.nl/view/item/911263?solr_nav%5Bid%5D=9c35daada1b9752cb51a&solr_nav%5Bpage%5D=8520&solr_nav%5Boffset%5D=3.
Tjahjopurnomo, R. 2011. Sejarah Permuseuman di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Permuseuman, Direktorat Jenderal Sejarah dan Purbakala, Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif.
Yusiani, Anne Putri. 2010. “Pedagogi Museum di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Museum Nasional”. Skripsi S-1, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=131356&lokasi=lokal.