The Effect of Current Density on The Surface Morphology in the Thin Coating Process of Nickel on Zr-2 Using the Electroplating Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55981/urania.2025.9199Keywords:
electroplating, nickel, zirconium-2, thin film, current densityAbstract
After the Fukushima-Daiichi reactor accident in 2011, one of the research and development focuses of nuclear fuel worldwide has been on coatings for Enhanced Accident Tolerant Fuels (EATF). Chromium (Cr) coatings are considered suitable due to their high oxidation resistance; however, Cr has limitations, particularly its poor diffusion on certain materials such as zirconium (Zr). Nickel coatings are therefore used as an interlayer to overcome the diffusion problem of chromium on zirconium substrates. Several surface coating methods are available, such as physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF), detonation gun (D-Gun), and electroplating. Electroplating was chosen in this study because of its high productivity, simple equipment, and low cost. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of current density on the surface morphology in the electroplating of Zr-2 with nickel. Electroplating is a process in which metal ions in an electrolyte solution are driven by an electric field to deposit onto a material. The electrolyte solution used in this study consisted of 200 g/L NiSO₄·6H₂O as the nickel source, 35 g/L NiCl₂·6H₂O as the activator, and 30 g/L H₃BO₃ as the pH buffer. The current densities applied were 0.015 A/cm², 0.025 A/cm², and 0.05 A/cm². After deposition, hardness tests were conducted, and the surface morphology was examined using SEM and EDS. The results showed that increasing the current density led to larger average nickel grain sizes, namely 4.68 μm, 6.19 μm, and 6.84 μm, as well as larger pore areas on the surface, namely 6.5 μm², 20.85 μm², and 27.98 μm². Micro-Vickers hardness tests indicated that higher current density increased hardness values, measured at 163.48 HV, 178 HV, and 234.25 HV, respectively. Cross-sectional SEM analysis revealed that the coating produced at a current density of 0.015 A/cm² showed better quality compared to higher current densities. This was evidenced by smaller pore areas, thinner coating thickness (7.44 μm compared to 19.17 μm and 8.42 μm), and the absence of defects at the coating–substrate interface, which were observed at 0.025 and 0.05 A/cm². To achieve thickness values closer to calculations, uniform spacing between the cathode and anode as well as the use of a fresh electrolyte solution are recommended. The use of a nickel interlayer can be a promising option to improve the surface performance of Zr-2.
References
[1] J. C. Brachet et al., “High temperature steam oxidation of chromium-coated zirconium-based alloys: Kinetics and process,” Corros Sci, vol. 167, p. 108537, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CORSCI.2020.108537.
[2] J. C. Brachet et al., “Early studies on Cr-Coated Zircaloy-4 as enhanced accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings for light water reactors,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 517, pp. 268–285, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2019.02.018.
[3] S. Yeo, J. H. Kim, and H. S. Yun, “Effect of pulse current and coating thickness on the microstructure and FCCI resistance of electroplated chromium on HT9 steel cladding,” Surf Coat Technol, vol. 389, p. 125652, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2020.125652.
[4] J. Yang et al., “Review on chromium coated zirconium alloy accident tolerant fuel cladding,” J Alloys Compd, vol. 895, p. 162450, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2021.162450.
[5] D. V. Sidelev, C. Poltronieri, M. Bestetti, M. G. Krinitcyn, V. A. Grudinin, and E. B. Kashkarov, “A comparative study on high-temperature air oxidation of Cr-coated E110 zirconium alloy deposited by magnetron sputtering and electroplating,” Surf Coat Technol, vol. 433, p. 128134, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2022.128134.
[6] N. Capps and R. Sweet, “Model for determining rupture area in Zircaloy cladding under LOCA conditions,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 401, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2022.112096.
[7] P. Baque, R. Darras, A. Lafon, and H. Loriers, “Protection du zirconium contre l’oxydation au moyen de revetements metalliques,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 166–171, Feb. 1968, doi: 10.1016/0022-3115(68)90042-1.
[8] Z. Yang, Y. Niu, J. Xue, T. Liu, C. Chang, and X. Zheng, “Steam oxidation resistance of plasma sprayed chromium-containing coatings at 1200 °C,” Materials and Corrosion, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 37–47, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/maco.201810156.
[9] W. G. Luscher, E. R. Gilbert, S. G. Pitman, and E. F. Love, “Surface modification of Zircaloy-4 substrates with nickel zirconium intermetallics,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 433, no. 1–3, pp. 514–522, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.039.
[10] M. Huang, Y. Li, G. Ran, Z. Yang, and P. Wang, “Cr-coated Zr-4 alloy prepared by electroplating and its in situ He+ irradiation behavior,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 538, p. 152240, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2020.152240.
[11] H. Okamoto, “Ni-Zr (nickel-zirconium),” J Phase Equilibria Diffus, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 409, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1007/S11669-007-9120-Z/FIGURES/1.
[12] D. V. Sidelev, E. B. Kashkarov, M. S. Syrtanov, and V. P. Krivobokov, “Nickel-chromium (Ni–Cr) coatings deposited by magnetron sputtering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings,” Surf Coat Technol, vol. 369, pp. 69–78, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2019.04.057.
[13] S. Shankar, D. E. Koenig, and L. E. Dardi, “Vacuum Plasma Sprayed Metallic Coatings,” JOM: Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 13–20, Dec. 1981, doi: 10.1007/BF03339507/METRICS.
[14] V. Kuzmin, I. Gulyaev, D. Sergachev, S. Vaschenko, E. Kornienko, and A. Tokarev, “Equipment and technologies of air-plasma spraying of functional coatings,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 129, p. 01052, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1051/MATECCONF/201712901052.
[15] R. Vilar, “Laser cladding,” J Laser Appl, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 64–79, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.2351/1.521888.
[16] V. Boronenkov and Y. Korobov, “Fundamentals of arc spraying: Physical and chemical regularities,” Fundamentals of Arc Spraying: Physical and Chemical Regularities, pp. 1–256, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22306-3/COVER.
[17] C. qun LI, X. hai LI, Z. xin WANG, and H. jun GUO, “Nickel electrodeposition from novel citrate bath,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1300–1306, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60266-0.
[18] E. S. Güler, “Effects of Electroplating Characteristics on the Coating Properties,” Electrodeposition of Composite Materials, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5772/61745.
[19] D. Topayung, “Pengaruh Arus Listrik dan Waktu Proses Terhadap Ketebalan dan Massa Lapisan yang Terbentuk pada Proses Elektroplating Pelat Baja,” Jurnal Ilmiah Sains, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 97–101, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.35799/JIS.11.1.2011.50.
[20] A. Rasyad et al., “Analisis Pengaruh Temperatur, Waktu, dan Kuat arus Proses Elektroplating Terhadap Kuat Tarik, Kuat Tekuk dan Kekerasan pada Baja Karbon Rendah,” Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 173–182, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusuf Gigih Wicaksono, Ridwan, Azwar Manaf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
