Evaluating The Effectiveness of Radon Measurement Techniques in Soil Gas: Impact of Hole Depth and Measurement Time

Main Article Content

Mochamad Iqbal
Fitra Berlian
Bilal Al Farishi
Vico Luthfi Ipmawan
Rahmat Nawi Siregar
Rofiqul Umam

Abstract

Radon measurement methodologies are critical for accurate risk assessment and resource optimization, yet challenges persist in determining the optimal sampling depth and measurement duration. These factors significantly influence radon concentration readings, and their impact still needs to be explored in systematic evaluations, particularly in balancing efficiency and accuracy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of radon measurement methodologies by experimenting with how sampling hole depth and measurement duration affect radon concentration in soil gas. Radon experiments were conducted at depths of 0.5 m, 1.0 m, and 1.2 m over a 39-day period in soft tuff rock formations at Institut Teknologi Sumatera. Measurements were taken on Days 0, 6, 12, 18, 27, and 39 using the RAD7 Radon Detector, with multiple cycles to ensure stability. The results indicate that radon concentrations varied significantly with both depth and time, with the highest concentrations observed at 1.2 m on Day 18 (1,089 Bq/m³). A noticeable “lag effect” was observed following rainfall events, where radon levels initially decreased due to soil saturation but spiked as the soil dried. The depth of 0.5 m provided the most consistent measurements, with the lowest coefficient of variation (CV = 31%), making it the most reliable and practical depth for routine radon assessments. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering environmental conditions, such as rainfall and soil moisture, when interpreting radon data and provides insights into optimizing radon measurement practices for accuracy and efficiency.

Article Details

How to Cite
Iqbal, M., Berlian, F., Al Farishi, B., Ipmawan, V. L., Siregar, R. N., & Umam, R. (2024). Evaluating The Effectiveness of Radon Measurement Techniques in Soil Gas: Impact of Hole Depth and Measurement Time. EKSPLORIUM, 45(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.55981/eksplorium.2024.7134
Section
Articles

References

[1] M. Baskaran, Radon: A Tracer for Geological, Geophysical and Geochemical Studies. Springer, 2016.

[2] WHO, WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. in WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009. Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143216/.

[3] M. N. Heriawan, A. A. Syafi’i, A. Saepuloh, T. Kubo, and K. Koike, “Detection of Near-Surface Permeable Zones Based on Spatial Correlation Between Radon Gas Concentration and DTM-Derived Lineament Density,” Nat Resour Res, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2989–3015, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11053-020-09718-z.

[4] K. Koike, T. Yoshinaga, and H. Asaue, “Characterizing Long-term Radon Concentration Changes in A Geothermal Area for Correlation with Volcanic Earthquakes and Reservoir Temperatures: A Case Study from Mt. Aso, Southwestern Japan,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 275, pp. 85–102, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.02.007.

[5] S. Sukanya, J. Noble, and S. Joseph, “Application of Radon (222Rn) as An Environmental Tracer in Hydrogeological and Geological Investigations: An Overview,” Chemosphere, vol. 303, p. 135141, Sep. 2022,

doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135141.

[6] R. Prasetio, N. Laksminingpuri, S. Satrio, E. R. Pujiindiyati, B. Pratikno, and P. Sidauruk, “The 222Rn and CO2 Soil Gas Distribution at Lembang Fault Zone, West Java - Indonesia,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 257, p. 107079, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107079.

[7] R. Prasetio, J. Hutabarat, Y. Daud, and H. Hendarmawan, “Distribution of 222Rn and CO2 Across Faults and Its Origin in Wayang Windu Geothermal Area, West Java - Indonesia,” Geothermics, vol. 110, p. 102691, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102691.

[8] I. A. E. Agency, “Measurement and Calculation of Radon Releases from NORM Residues,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Text, 2013. Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/publications/10369/measurement-and-calculation-of-radon-releases-from-norm-residues.

[9] W. W. Nazaroff, Radon and Its Decay Products in Indoor Air, United States: John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated, 1988. [Online]. Available: http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:21058186.

[10] N. M. Hassan, M. Hosoda, T. Ishikawa, A. Sorimachi, S. K. Sahoo, S. Tokonami, and M. Fukushi “Radon Migration Process and Its Influence Factors; Review,” Japanese Journal of Health Physics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 218–231, 2009, doi: 10.5453/jhps.44.218.

[11] J. C. Miles, “Temporal Variation of Radon Levels in Houses and Implications for Radon Measurement Strategies,” Radiat Prot Dosimetry, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 369–376, 2001, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006449.

[12] S. D. Schery, D. H. Gaeddert, and M. H. Wilkening, “Factors Affecting Exhalation of Radon from A Gravelly Sandy Loam,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 89, no. D5, pp. 7299–7309, 1984, doi: 10.1029/JD089iD05p07299.

[13] S. A. Mangga, Amirudin, T. Suwarti, S. Gafoer, and Sidarto, Geological Map of The Tanjungkarang Quadrangle, Sumatera, Scale 1:250000, Geological Research and Development Centre, Bandung, 1993.

[14] M. Iqbal, B. R. Juliarka, W. Ashuri, and B. A. Farishi, “Hydrogeochemistry of Natar and Cisarua Hot Springs in South Lampung, Indonesia,” Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 178–185, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.25299/jgeet.2019.4.3.2959.