One Method to Improve The Official Poverty Line in Indonesia
Keywords:
absolute poverty line, subjective approach, expenditure of poverty line, basic needs, variables and dimension of povertyAbstract
Poverty is one of the long standing problems in Indonesia. Using the national absolute poverty line, it was estimated that the proportion of the poor has declined from 40.1% in 1976 to 10.5% in 2014. However, many people claim that the above percentage of the poor is only true in terms of statistics. The poor argue that the amount of rupiah expenditure set as the official poverty line is inadequate to fulfil their basic needs. This paper, based on a field survey of 360 respondents of the poor and the non-poor in three villages in three different provinces located in the Eastern, Western and Central parts of Indonesia, aims at examining a method to improve the national poverty line and to determine the minimum rupiah expenditure of the poverty line using a subjective approach. The method used to examine this research question is by - using questionnaires, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in depth interviews. Sample respondents were asked their perceptions on variables, dimensions and indicators that should be accommodated in formulating the subjective poverty line. They were also questioned about the minimum rupiah expenditure threshold to define the subjective poverty line. The study found that the official poverty line that has been determined by the government was far below the subjective poverty line that was defined by the respondents. Also, the variables, dimension and indicators that should be accommodated in the national poverty line should not only be food items, but also access to employment, housing, health and education for children. The minimum rupiah expenditure of the poverty line was argued to be more than Rp 500 000 equal to US$40 per capita per month. This minimum rupiah expenditure of the subjective poverty line is almost double that of the official poverty line set at the average of Rp 300 000 or US$24 per capita per month. Therefore, the government not only needs to revise the present poverty line, but also needs to revise policies and programs to eliminate poverty by taking into account the dimension and variables of poverty viewed by the poor and the non-poor. If not, the incidence of poverty will remain with us.
References
Asra, 2010. Kemiskinan Perkotaan : Konsep, Fakta, Faktor dan Strategi, Bahan Orasi Pengukuhan Profesor Riset Bidang Ekonomi Kota dan Regional.
__________, 2013. Konsep dan Definisi Kemiskinan, dalam CM Firdausy (ed), Kemiskinan Alternatif di Indonesia, Laporan Penelitian, LIPI, Jakarta.
__________, 2011. Kemiskinan Perkotaan: Perkembangan, Determinan dan Strategi Pengentasannya. Orasi Pengukuhan Profesor Riset. BPS/LIPI. Maret 2011. Jakarta.
__________, 2006. Book Review on J. Weiss (editor). 2005. Poverty Targeting in Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Asian Development Bank Institute and Edward Elgar Publishing. Published in Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies (BIES), Vol. 42, No. 2.
__________, Estrada, G., Kim, Y., and Quibria, M.G. 2005. “Poverty and Foreign Aid: Evidence from Recent Cross-Country Data”, ERD Working Paper Series, No. 65, Manila: ADB.
__________, 2000. “Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia: Estimates, decomposition and key issues.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 5(1/2). UK: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
__________, 1999. “Urban-Rural Differences in Costs of Living and Their Impact on Poverty Measures.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies. Vol. 35. No. 3. December.
__________, Isidoro P. David, dan R.A. Virola. 1997. “Poverty Assessment in the Philippines and Indonesia: Methodlogical Comparison.” Journal of Philippine Development. Vol.
XXIV. No. 44. BPS, 2011. Berita Resmi Statistik. No 06 /01/th XV,2 Januari 2012
_______,2014. Berita Resmis Statistik. No. 10/02/th XX/ 2014.
_________________, 2010. Data Strategis BPS, BPS, Jakarta.
_________________, 2010. Berita Resmi Statistik, 1 July 2010, BPS, Jakarta.
__________________,2009. Analisa Kemiskinan, Ketenagakerjaan dan Distribusi Pendapatan, BPS, Jakarta.
___________. 2011. Data Strategis BPS. Jakarta: BPS.
__________. 2009. Analisis dan Penghitungan Tingkat Kemiskinan 2009. Jakarta: BPS.
__________. 1984. Indikator Pemerataan Pendapatan: Jumlah dan Persentase Penduduk Miskin di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS.
Chatterjee, S., Asra, A. and Estrada, G. 2006. “Geographical Targeting of Operations for Poverty Reduction”. Poverty and Sosial Development Papers, Technical Note No. 1/July 2006, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Clark, David., 2005. The Capability approach : Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances, Global Poverty Research Group.
Foster, J., J. Greer, dan E. Thorbecke. 1984. “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures.” Econometrica 52(3): 761-6.
Goedhart, T. et.al. 1978. “The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement.” The Journal of Human Resources. XII.4.
Gustafsson, B. dan Ximing Yue. 2006. “Rural People’s Perception of Poverty in China.” Discussion Paper No. 2486. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
Herrera, J., M. Razaffindrakoto and F Roubaud, 2006. The determinants of subjective poverty: A Comparative analysis between Madagaskar and Peru, Document de Travail, France.
Hulme, D. et.al. 2001. “Chronic Poverty: meanings and analytical frameworks.” CPRC Working Paper. No. 2. Chronic Poverty Research Centre. University of Manchester: Institute of Development Policy and Management.
Jordan, G. 2004. “The Causes of Poverty- Cultural vs. Structural: Can There Be a Synthesis?. Perspectives in Public Affairs. Spring 2004.
Kakwani, N. 2003. “Issues in Setting Absolute Poverty Lines.” Poverty and Sosial Development Paper, No. 3/June. Manila: ADB.
Kingdon, G.G and John Knight, 2004. Subjective well being poverty versus income poverty and capablities poverty, Global Poverty Research Group.
Mangahas, M. 2008. “SWS Monitoring of Self-Rated Deprivation.” Makalah untuk PIDS-NEDAUNDP Project “Comprehensive Documentation and Analysis of Issues on the Official Poverty Estimation Methodology of the Philippines.” 24 July.
Ravallion, M. 1992. Poverty Comparisons: A Guide to Concepts and Methods. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom, New York. UNDP, 2003. Promoting the Millennium Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific, New York.
Van Praag, Benard and AF Carbonnel, 2006. A Multi-dimensional Approach to Subjective Poverty. Paper presented at the conference on the measurement of Multidimensional Poverty:Theory and Evidence, UNDP, Brazilia, August 29, 2005.
Wagle, U, 2002. Rethinking Poverty: Definition and Measurement, International Sosial Science Journal, vol 54 (171). Hal. 155-165.
World Bank, 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001, Washington D.C : http:/go.worldbank.org/7KWQQ1WVTO.
_____________2006. Making the New Indonesia Work for the Poor. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Carunia Mulya Firdausy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work, as long as they credit the author and license their new creations under the same terms.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided there is an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and increase citations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access ).