212 Mart Movement In Palembang: The Failed Experiment of Islamic Populism

Authors

  • Afdil Hafidh Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • M. Falikul Isbah Universitas Gadjah Mada

Keywords:

Islamic Populism Ideology, Socio-Economic Movement, Mobilization of People’s Resources

Abstract

The case of blasphemy charges against Basuki Cahaya Purnama, also known as Ahok, in Jakarta in 2017 sparked a wave of mass protests, calling themselves the 212 Movement. Based on various criteria and characteristics, scholars have labeled it as an Islamic populist movement, which later inspired various articulations of the movement in different locations. This article explores the articulation of this movement in the economic field under the name 212 Mart in Palembang, South Sumatra. Using the framework of Social Movement Theory, there are two main findings. First, the 212 Mart movement attempts to articulate the ideology of Islamic populism as the framing of the movement through identity sentiments and the strengthening of the community’s economy. The ideology of Islamic populism positions the Muslim community as socially and economically marginalized. Second, the failure of the experimentation of Islamic populism in the 212 Mart movement is attributed to the weakening of economic opportunities and the structure of political opportunities. Thus, this article has contributed to studying Islamic populism through social movement theory by revealing the failure of the 212 Mart movement in Palembang.

Author Biographies

Afdil Hafidh, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

M. Falikul Isbah, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

References

Alhammadi, S., Alotaibi, K. O., & Hakam, D. F. (2020). Analysing Islamic banking ethical performance from Maqāid al-Sharī‘ah perspective: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1848179

Arditi, B. (2007). Politics on the Edges of Liberalism, Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Amal, M. K., Damanhuri & Sahri, I. K. (2020). Islamic Populism and Democracy in Post-New Order Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Spasi Book.

Basya, M. H. (2019). Populisme Islam, Krisis Modal Sosial dan Tantangan Terhadap Demokrasi: Refleksi Pemilu 2019. Maarif, 14(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.47651/mrf.v14i1.48

Bayat, A. (2011). Post-Islamisme. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fealy, G. (2016). Bigger than Ahok: Explaining the 2 December mass rally. Indonesia at Melbourne.

Hadiz, V. R. (2017). Indonesia’s year of democratic setbacks: towards a new phase of deepening illiberalism? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1410311

Hadiz, V. R. (2018). Imagine All the People? Mobilising Islamic Populism for Right-Wing Politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1433225

Hadiz, V. R. (2019). Populisme Islam di Indonesia dan Timur Tengah. Jakarta: LP3ES

Hafidh, A. (2020). Gerakan Ekonomi 212 Mart di Palembang: Sebuah Eksperimentasi Populisme Islam yang Gagal. Thesis, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University

Hafidh, A., & Lidya, E. (2019). Transformasi Usaha Berbasis Agama : Studi Kasus 212 Mart di Palembang. Empirika, 8364, 81–94. http://journalempirika.fisip.unsri.ac.id/index.php/empirika/article/view/75/pdf

Hamidi, L., & Worthington, A. C. (2021). How social is Islamic banking? Society and Business Review, 16(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-03-2020-0036

Hassan, N. (2012). Islam Politik di Dunia Kontemporer: Konsep, Geneologi, dan Teori. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press.Ichwan, Moch Nur. 2016. “MUI, Gerakan Islamis dan Umat Mengambang”, dalam Ma’arif Vol. 11 (2), Desember, 1-104

Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideolog ’ y in Marxist Theory.

McAdam, Doug; McCarthy, John D.; & Zald, Mayer N (eds). 2004. Comparative Perspectivees on Social Movements: Political Opportunity, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Madung, O. G. (2018). Populisme, Krisis Demokrasi dan Antagonisme”, Jurnal Ledalero, 17 (1) , 58-78.

Mietzner, M. (2020). Rival populisms and the democratic crisis in Indonesia: chauvinists, Islamists and technocrats. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1725426

Mietzner, M., & Muhtadi, B. (2018). Explaining the 2016 Islamist Mobilisation in Indonesia : Religious Intolerance, Militant Groups and the Politics of Accommodation Explaining the 2016 Islamist Mobilisation in Indonesia: Religious Intolerance , Militant Groups and the Politics of Accommo. Asian Studies Review, 42 (3), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1473335

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 541-563.

Perdana, A. A. (2017). Menguatnya Populisme: Trump, Brexit hingga FPI. Harian IndoPROGRESS, January, 1–10. https://indoprogress.com/2017/01/menguatnya-populisme-trump-brexit-hingga-fpi/

Religions, T. W. (2009). Routledge Handbook of. In Political Science. http://scholar.google.com

Kenny, P. D. (2017). Populism and Patronage Why Populism Win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond. USA-OSO: Oxford University Press.

Kuru, A. T. (2007). Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion. World Politics, 59(4), 568–594. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0005

Palembang, B. P. S. K. (2021). Kota Palembang Dalam Angka 2021. Issn: 2527-9009, 43–52.

Situmorang, A. W. (2013). Gerakan Sosial: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sukmana, O. (2016). Konsep Dan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004). Islamic Activism A Social Movement Theory Approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30