Diplomacy of Semarang City Government through International Human Rights Festival 2021-2022

Authors

  • Anna Yulia Hartati Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Andi Purwono Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Agus Riyanto Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Amanda Noor Adiba Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Keywords:

City Diplomacy, International Human Rights Festival, City Image, Semarang

Abstract

Discourses on the role and responsibility of regional government in protecting and fulfilling human rights have drawn serious attention of international community. On the international level, the concept of human rights cities (Human Rights cities or regions) was introduced to promote more active engagement and empowerment in developing and advancing its respective regions. This discourse is facilitated by involvement and active participation of sub-national government (regional government or city government) in responding international issues. Studies on the involvement of cities in diplomacy has been conducted, yet none of those discussed the cities’ engagement in international human rights issues. Semarang city has been selected as the host of International Human Rights Festival in 2021. The purpose of this research is to find out the motivation of Semarang City Government in becoming the host of International Human Rights Festival. Theoretical framework for this research is city diplomacy and human cities rights concept. The method used in this research is qualitative, data collected through interview, observation and document study. The finding of this research shows that the purpose of Semarang city government in becoming the host of International Human Rights Festival in 2021 is to promote Semarang city’s image, advance international relations, to improve awarness of its people on human rights issues and promoting tourism.

References

Acuto, M., & Rayner, S. (2016). City networks: Breaking gridlock or forging (new) lock‐ins? International Affairs, 92(3), 723–741.

Alvarez, M., & Oddone, N. (2020). Revisiting paradiplomacy in the context of COVID-19. In R. Ventura De Marco (Ed.), Revisiting paradiplomacy in the context of COVID-19. E-International Relations.

Bigo, D. (2010). Freedom and speed in enlarged borderzones. In V. Squire (Ed.), The contested politics of mobility: Borderzones and irregularity (pp. 31–49). London: Routledge.

Duchacek, I. (1986). The territorial dimension of politics: Within, among and across nations. Westview Press.

Duchacek, I. D. (1988). Multicommunal and bicommunal polities and their international relations. In I. D. Duchacek, D. Latouche, & G. Stevenson (Eds.), Perforated sovereignties and international relations: Trans-sovereign contacts of subnational governments (pp. 3–28). Greenwood Press.

Duchacek, I. D. (1990). Perforated sovereignties: Towards a typology of new actors in international relations. In H. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units (pp. 1–33). Clarendon Press.

Evans, P., Jacobson, H., & Putnam, R. (Eds.). (1993). Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. University of California Press.

Setzer, J., & Anderton, K. (2019). Subnational leaders and diplomacy. International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.504

Soetjipto, W. A. (2015). HAM dan politik internasional: Sebuah pengantar [Human rights and international politics: An introduction]. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sujatmoko, A. (2016). Hukum HAM dan hukum humaniter [Human rights law and humanitarian law]. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30