EXPLORING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING FROM ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR IN THE REALITIES OF ACEHNESE COMMUNITY

Main Article Content

Safuwan Amin
Ella Suzanna

Abstract

Well-being as a psychological construct that has multiple interpretations according to the context of the social, cultural, or religious beliefs of each individual/society in this world is an interesting study in the reality of psychological studies. This study aims to explore the well being construct of altruistic behavior in the aspects of knowledge, appreciation, and realization of citizens’ behavior in the reality of Aceh by taking a sample of residents of North Aceh, Aceh Province. This study was designed qualitatively with a thematic analysis model. The participants were chosen using random sampling. The research findings provide information that in the knowledge aspect, participants perceive well-being as a goal according to their religious beliefs. Likewise, the record of the appreciation and meaning of well-being also follows their religious beliefs. Based on the aforementioned, the realization/tendency of behavior is based on the uptake of their religious doctrines, prioritizing virtue in all aspects, including cultural practices/traditions that prevail in the surrounding social reality.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amin, S., & Suzanna, E. (2023). EXPLORING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING FROM ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR IN THE REALITIES OF ACEHNESE COMMUNITY. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 24(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.55981/jmb.2022.1250
Section
Articles

References

Belzak W.C.M., Thrash T.M., Sim Y.Y., Wadsworth L.M. (2017) Beyond Hedonic

and Eudaimonic Well-Being: Inspiration and the Self-Transcendence Tradition.

In: Robinson M., Eid M. (eds) The Happy Mind: Cognitive Contributions to Well-

Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_7

Burns, R. (2016). Psychosocial Well-being. Encyclopedia of Geropsychology,18.

https://doi.org/ 10.1007/ 978-981-287-080-3_251-1

Batson, C.D. (2014). The Altruism Question; Toward a Social-Psychological

Answer, New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative

Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101.

https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Creswell, JW. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among

five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Textbook

Crisp R.J. & Turner R.N. (2014). Essential Social Psychology. London: Sage

Publications. Textbooks

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2005). Subjective Well-being: The Science

of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.),

Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 63-73). New York: Oxford

University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780195187243.013.0017

Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining

wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222-235.

https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4

Ivtzan, I., Chan, C.P.L., Gardner, H.E., et al. (2013). Linking Religion and

Spirituality with Psychological Well-being: Examining Self-actualisation, Meaning

in Life, and Personal Growth Initiative. Journal of Religion and Health. 52, 915–

929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9540-2

Green, M & Elliott, M (2010). Religion, Health, and Psychological well-being,

Journal of Religion and Health, 49(2).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9242-1

Heriyanto (2018). Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk

Penelitian Kualitatif. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234034028.pdf

Hidayati, F (2016). Konsep altruisme dalam perspektif Pendidikan Islam (Itsar),

Jurnal Psikoislamika, 13 (1), pp. 59-63.

Kim, U., et.al (Eds), (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding

people in context. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar

McGregor, I & Little, B. R. (1998). “Personal Projects, Happiness, and Meaning:

On Doing Well and Being Yourself,” Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 74(2), pp. 494-512

Ryff, C.D & Keye, C.L.M (1995). The Structure of Psychological well-being

Revisited, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), pp. 719-727.

http://www.aging.wisc.edu/midus/

Ryff, C.D (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning

of Psychological well-being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6),

pp.1069-1081. https://pdfs. semanticscholar.org/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A

Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of

Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Seligman, M.E. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology

to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press. Google

Scholar

Sonnentag, S (2015). Dynamic of Well-being, Annual Review of Organizational

Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1). pp. 261-293. https://doi.org/

10.1146/annual-orgpsych-032414-111347.

Taylor, S.E, et.al. (2012). Social Psychology. (12th Ed). Pearson Education-

Prentice Hall. Textbook

Pareek, S & Jain, M (2012). Subjective Well-being to Altruism and Forgiveness

Among School Going Adolescents, International Journal of Psychology and

Behavioral Sciences. 2(5), pp. 138-141. https://doi.org/10.5923/

j.ijpbs.20120205.02

Plaut VC, Markus HR, Treadway JR, Fu AS. (2012). The cultural construction of

self and well-being: a tale of two cities. Personality and Social Psychology

Bulletin. 38(12):1644-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212458125

Oishi, S & Schimmack, U. (2010). Culture and Well-being: A New Inquiry Into the

Psychological Wealth of Nations, Perspectives on Psychological Science. 5(4),

pp. 463—471. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1745691610375561

Oishi, S. (2012). Individual and Societal Well-Being. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.001.0001/oxfordhb-

9780195398991-e-024

Waterman, A.S. (1993) Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal

Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, Vol. 64, pp. 678-691.