THE PRACTICE OF THE RIGHT OF WORKERS TO ORGANIZE IN POST-REFORMATION ERA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Serikat Pekerja di Indonesia seolah menemukan kembali “semangatâ€nya setelah masa reformasi. Aktifitas Serikat Pekerja yang di rejim sebelumnya sangat terbatas mulai bangkit dan kembali menyuarakan hak-hak pekerja. Namun demikian, kebangkitan Serikat Pekerja ini tidak berarti tanpa kendala, terutama apabila pelaksanaannya disandingkan dengan pedoman yang diberikan dalam hokum internasional khususnya dalam Konvensi-konvensi ILO. Dalam artikel ini dibahas berbagai bentuk kendala yang dihadapi Serikat Pekerja di Indonesia seperti kriminalisasi aktivis Serikat Pekerja dan pengerahan massa dalam menghadapi aksi-aksi Serikat Pekerja. Serikat Pekerja sebagai ujung tombak pemenuhan hak-hak dasar pekerja di Indonesia menjadi penting di tengah menurunnya kondisi ekonomi yang seringkali dijadikan alasan banyak pengusaha untuk tidak memenuhi hak pekerja. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dan analisa media. Dari studi ini ditemukan beberapa ‘tren’ sikap diskriminasi anti-serikat pekerja, meski beberapa diantaranya bukan merupakan bentuk yang baru seperti kriminalisasi aktivis serikat pekerja, pembentukan serikat pekerja “bayanganâ€, penyerangan terhadap aktivis serikat pekerja, intimidasi pada pekerja, mekanisme registrasi yang masih berbelit, dan respon pasif atas laporan-laporan tindakan diskriminatif yang diterima aktivis dan anggota serikat pekerja. Keyword: Worker Union, the Right to Organise, Indonesian Labour.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Borkent, Hans, et.al. (1981), Indonesian workers and their right to organise, Indonesian Documentation and Information Center INDOC, Leiden.
Boulton, Alan. J. (2000), The future structure of industrial relations in Indonesia, Working Paper INS/00/M51/USA, ILO/USA Declaration Project, Jakarta.
Dunning, Harold (1998), The origins of Convention No. 87 on freedom of association and the right to organise, 137 (2) International Labour Review, pp. 149-167.
Fenwick, Colin (et.al.) (2002), Labour disputes settlement reform in Indonesia: A guide to the policy and legal issues raised by the Industrial Dispute Settlement Bill, International Labour Office, Jakarta.
Galenson, Walter (1994), Trade unions growth and decline: An international study, Praeger, Westport.
Gernigon, Bernard (et.al.) (2000), Collective bargaining: ILO standards and the principles of the supervisory bodies, International Labour Office, Geneva.
________________ (et.al.) (2002), Prinsip-prinsip ILO tentang hak mogok translated from ILO principles concerning the right to strike, International Labour Office, Jakarta.
Hadiz, Vedi R. (1997), Workers and the State in New Order Indonesia, Routledge, London.
ILO Jakarta Office (1998), Kebebasan berserikat dan perlindungan terhadap hak berorganisasi dan hak untuk berunding – Freedom of association and protection of the right to organise and the right to bargain, ILO, Jakarta.
______________ (1999), Demistifying the Core Conventions of the ILO through Social Dialogue: The Indonesian Experience, the International Labour Organisation, Jakarta.
ILO/UNDP/ASEAN Programme of Industrial Relations for Development (1988), A survey of the current situation on ASEAN: The problem of union recognition, ILO Asia-Pacific.
International Labour Office (1995), ILO law on freedom of association: Standards and procedures, the International Labour Organisation, Geneva.
___________________ (2002), The International Labour Organisation’s Fundamental Conventions, ILO-InFocus Programme on Promoting the Declaration.
Indonesian Documentation and Information Center – INDOC (1982), Indonesian workers and their right to organise: February 1982 Update, INDOC, Leiden.
Legal Aid Institute Jakarta (LBH Jakarta) (2002), Catatan Akhir Tahun (CATAHU) LBH Jakarta 2002: Hukum dalam cengkraman kaum merkantil—LBH Jakarta’s End Year Report The Law under the mercantilists, LBH Jakarta, Jakarta.
_________________________ (2003), Kaleidoskop LBH Jakarta Desember 2001-November 2002 – LBH Jakarta’s Kaleidoscope December 2001-November 2003, LBH Jakarta, Jakarta.
Perrins, Bryn (1985), Trade unions law, Butterworths, London.
Poole, Michael (1981), Theories of trade unionism: A sociology of industrial relations, Routledge, London.
Simanjuntak, Payaman. J. (1995), Trade unionism in Indonesia, Himpunan Pembina Sumberdaya Manusia Indonesia-Indonesia’s Human Resources Development Association, Jakarta.
____________________ (2002), The new law on Trade Unions, ILO/USA Declaration Project, Jakarta.
____________________ (2003), The new law on Manpower, ILO/USA Declaration Project, Jakarta.
Sudono, Agus (1977), The Indonesian trade unions movement and its policies: A collection of speeches, Asian-American Free Labor Institute, Jakarta.
SMERU (2002), Industrial relations in Jabotabek, Bandung, and Surabaya during the freedom to organise era, Research Report, SMERU, Jakarta.
Taylor, Veronica (ed.) (1997), Asian laws through Australian eyes, LBC Information Services, North Ride New South Wales.
Internet sources:
Eramoslem (2002), LBH prihatin atas tindakan PHK dan intimidasi RS Pondok Indah terhadap karyawannya – The concern of the LBH for the dismissal and intimidation of the Pondok Indah Hospital to its workers, 6 November 2002, retrieved from http://www.eramoslem.com/berita/nasional/211/06125621,4218,1,v.html at 4 September 2003.
Feulner, Frank (2001), Consolidating democracy in Indonesia: Contributions of civil society and state Part One: Civil society, United Nations Support Facility for Indonesian Recovery (UNSFIR) Working Paper 01/04, retrieved from <http://www.unsfir.or.id/publications/working paper/wp01-04.pdf> at 20 August 2003.
International Labour Organisation (ILO),
Islam, Inayatul (2000), Employment, labour markets, and economic recovery in Indonesia: Issues and options, United Nations Support Facility for Indonesian Recovery (UNSFIR) Working Paper 00/04, retrieved from http://www.unsfir.or.id/publications/workingpaper/Labour%20mkt%2000-04.pdf at 20 August 2003.
KOMPAS (2000), Politik perburuhan yang amburadul – The falling apart labour politics, 6 March 2000, retrieved from http://www.kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0003/06/nasional/poli07.htm at 4 September 2003.
_________ (2001), Tak lama, usia kepentingan politik dalam gerakan buruh – A short age of political interest in labour movement, 24 June 2001, retrieved from http://www.kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0106/24/nasional/takl25.htm at 4 September 2003.
KOMPAS Cyber Media (2000), Orde Baru runtuh, serikat buruh tumbuh – The fall of the New Order, the rise of trade unions, 12 September 2000, retrieved from http://www.kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0009/12/nasional/orde07.htm at 25 August 2003.
__________________ (2003), Jumlah kasus PHK meningkat 34 persen – Dismissal cases increase to 34 percent, 4 February 2003, retrieved from http://www.kompas.com/utama/news/0302/05/042113.htm at 25 August 2003.
Koran Tempo Online (2000), Koordinator SBSI Kaltim divonis 7 bulan penjara – The coordinator of SBSI branch office East Kalimantan verdict for 7 months imprisonment, 14 May 2000, retrieved from http://www.korantempo.com/korantempo/news/nusantara/2001/5/14/1617.html at 4 September 2003.
________________ (2001), Hakim menolak permohonan penangguhan penahanan Ngadinah – The Court refuses the postponement of Ngadinah’s imprisonment, 17 May 2001, retrieved from http://www.korantempo.com/korantempo/news/metro/2001/5/17/1821.html at 4 September 2003.
TEMPO Interaktif (2003), Kuasa hukum SPSI-Farkes: Kasus RS Pondok Indah hanya rekayasa – Legal Counsellor of SPSI Farkes: The case of Pondok Indah Hospital is a made-up case, 26 March 2003, retrieved from http://www.tempo.co.id/news/2003/3/26/1,1,46,id.html at 4 September 2003.