DISCOURSE OF FAMILY WELL-BEING AND THE VALUE OF WORK AT RPTRA’S TESTIMONIAL VIDEOS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v21i3.808
Keywords:
family well being, job meaningfulness, child development

Main Article Content

Sunar Wibowo
Faculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Rustono Farady Marta
Master's Degree of Communication Science, Bunda Mulia University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Hana Panggabean
Faculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Well being is one of the global SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) movement in which Indonesian Government formally join. Integrated child friendly public spaces (Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak or abbreviated as RPTRA – in Indonesian), are built for improving cities to become Child Friendly Cities, which actually serve as a component for achieving this well-being SDG. This study aims  to show how RPTRA staff creatively communicate to public by uploading testimonial videos on YouTube,  which is intended to show how RPTRA’s existence is perceived by its surrounding community. Analyzing a sample of such videos using the Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis, it was found that RPTRAs provide real benefits  not only to children, but also to all family members, contributing to family well being. To put it in the context of RPTRA employment fenomena, the testimonial video also reveals the job meaningfulness as perceived by the RPTRA staff.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibowo, S., Marta, R. F., & Panggabean, H. (2025). DISCOURSE OF FAMILY WELL-BEING AND THE VALUE OF WORK AT RPTRA’S TESTIMONIAL VIDEOS. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v21i3.808
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 3 (2019): Vol. 21 No. 3 (2019)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Benson, P. (2015). YouTube as Text. In R. H. Jones (eds), A. Chik, & C. A. Hafner, DIscourse Analysis and DIgital Practices (pp. 81-96). London & New York: Routledge.

Courtois, C., Mechant, P., Ostyn, V., & Marez, L. D. (2013). Uploaders' Definition of the Networked Public on YouTube and Their Feedback Preferences: a Multi-Method Approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(6), 612-624. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.586727

Dijk, van, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283. doi:DOI: 10.1177/0957926593004002006

Dijk, van, T. A. (2004, August). From Text Grammar to Critical Discourse Analysis.

Dijk, van, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of DIscourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: the Universities. Discourse & SOciety, 4(2), 133-168. doi:DOI: 10.1177/0957926593004002002

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.

Gee, P. J. (2011). How to do Discourse Analysis: a Toolkit. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Herlina, N., & Nadiroh. (2018, April). Peran Strategis Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak Anak terhadap Lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 12(1), 104-116. doi:https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.121

Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (2006). Perspectives on Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Routledge & Kegan.

Jones, R. H. (2012). Discourse Analysis a resource book for students. Oxon: Routledge.

Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (2015). Introduction. In R. H. Jones (eds), A. Chik, & C. A. Hafner, Discourse and DIgital Practices (pp. 1-17). London and New York: Routledge.

Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating Between Meaningful Work and the Management of Meaning. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 491-511.

Oh, S., & Syn, S. Y. (2015). Motivations for Sharing Information and Social Support in Social Media: a Comparative Analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2045-2060.

Prakoso, S., & Dewi, J. (2017, Januari). Rasa Kelekatan Anak pada Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA). NALARs Jurnal Arsitektur, 17(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.17.1.1-10

Reimers, A. K., Schoeppe, S., Demetriou, Y., & Knapp, G. (2018). Physical Activity and Outdoor Play of Children in Public Playgrounds - Do Gender and Social Environment Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1356-1368. doi:10.3390/ijerph15071356

Rymes, B. (2012). Recontextualizing YouTube: from Macro-Micro to Mass-Mediated Communicative Repertoires. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43(2), 214-227. doi:DOI:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2012.01170.x.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Turhan, B., & Okan, Z. (2017, December). Critical DIscourse Analysis of Advertising: Implications for Language Teacher Education. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(4), 213-226. doi:10.18298/ijlet.2301

Warf, B., & Grimes, J. (1997, April). Counterhegemonic Discourses and the Internent. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259-273.

Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. London: Cambridge University Press