BUILDING MUTUAL COOPERATION AND ACTIVATE THE ROLE OF LOCAL LEADERSHIP PENTAHELIX'S STRATEGY FOR HANDLING THE IMPACT OF COVID-19
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has plunged Indonesian society and high socio-economic vulnerability. The government through policies and programs tries to overcome the impact of the pandemic and restore people's lives. Many other parties have contributed to handling the pandemic, but they are still sectoral. In its implementation, there is still a role gap, especially the role of the government is more prominent, while the participation of various parties, especially the community is still minimal. In fact, these steps have not yielded maximum results. This can be seen from the increasing number of pandemic exposures. One of the strategies for handling a pandemic that is quite effective is the effort to accommodate social capital within the pentahelix framework. This study shows that mutual cooperation and local leadership are the dominant features of social capital practices in Indonesia. In this case, the practice of mutual cooperation, both in an organic and systematic sense, is a thread of synergy and integration among stakeholders. Therefore, packaging and strengthening social capital in policies with the pentahelix framework is the "ultimate arrow" in handling the Covid-19 pandemic.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Hardiman, F. B. (2018). Demokrasi deliberatif. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Haridison, A. (2013). Modal sosial dalam pembangunan. (Skripsi) JISPAR FISIP
Universitas Palangka Raya.
Humaedi, M. A. (2020). Mendampingi kaum muda pada program urban nexus di
musim pandemi covid-19. Jakarta: YKRI dan Yayasan Plan Indonesia.
Humaedi, M. A.. (2012). Di rumah-Mu kami berlindung: Peran masjid dalam
penanganan bencana. Jakarta: UNOCHA.
Lees, J. (2020). Double disaster: Emergency preparedness in the era of Covid-
19. Diakses dari https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/double-disaster-
emergency-preparedness-era-covid-19.
Mubyarto. (2002). Kemiskinan masyarakat pedesaan. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.
Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and sociability: Household income and
social capital in rural tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change,
47(4), 871.
Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005). Understanding adaptation: What can social
capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity?. Global Environmental Change
15(4), 308–319. Doi: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2005.02.001. Dalam Putnam, R. D.
(1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy,
6(1), 65–78.
Sirovatka, T., & Mares, P. (2008). Social exclusion and forms of social capital.
Czech Sociological Revie., 44(3), 531–555.
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability.
Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292.
Doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.
Tessa, A. (2020). Worldview masyarakat dalam menghadapi bencana gunung
merapi. (Skripsi). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Usman, S. (2018). Modal sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wijaya, et al. (2019). Pemanfaatan modal sosial dalam penguatan desa tangguh
bencana. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Membangun Negeri, 2(1).
Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and
economic outcomes. Isuma, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1). Diakses
tanggal, bulan, tahun dari https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/indonesia/.