The Potential of Social Vulnerability in the Implementation of the 2024 Elections in Yogyakarta City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v21i1.1494Keywords:
Social vulnerability, 2024 Elections, YogyakartaAbstract
This article analyses the potential for social vulnerability caused by deep-rooted political conflicts involving two political parties with large mass bases in Yogyakarta. This research aims to describe the potential for social vulnerability conflicts during elections and conflict prevention strategies ahead of the 2024 elections in Yogyakarta based on a historical review of several previous elections. Mixed research methods were used through surveys and in-depth interviews. The results show that social vulnerability in implementing elections in Yogyakarta City comes from ideological differences and friction of economic interests. The election vulnerability mapping by researchers shows that the Notoprajan and Warungboto sub-districts have the highest level of vulnerability. Meanwhile, 43 other sub-districts are shown to have moderate social vulnerability. In addressing social vulnerability in the 2024 General Election, it is crucial to take a holistic and collaborative approach involving the government, election organisers, election participants, sympathizers, security apparatus and the community.
References
Legislation
Law No. 4 of 2011 on Geospatial Information.
Government Regulation No. 9/2019 on the Implementation of Law No. 4/2011 on Geospatial Information
Government Regulation No 45 of 2021 on the Implementation of Geospatial Information
Books and Article
Abhan dkk. 2020. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu (IKP) Pilkada Serentak 2020., diakses melalui https://sipekapilu.bawaslu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.-BUKU-LAPORAN-IKP PILKADA-2020-UPDATE-NOVEMBER.pdf
Bafdal, Nurpilihan dkk. 2011. Buku Ajar Sistem Informasi Geografis Edisi 1. Bandung : Jurusan Teknik Manajemen Industri Pertanian FTIP Universitas Padjadjaran.
Bawaslu. 2023. Visualisasi Data IKP Terupdate: IKP Pemilu dan Pemilihan Serentak 2024., diakses melalui https://sipekapilu.bawaslu.go.id/
Hadi, Usman. 2019. Polresta Yogya Petakan Daerah Rawan Konflik Pemilu, Ini Hasilnya. DetikNews, diakses melalui https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d 4454263/polresta-yogya-petakan-daerah-rawan-konflik-pemilu-ini-hasilnya
Cairney, P. C. (2019). Understanding public policy: theories and issues. Bloomsbury Publishing
Creswell, John W. 2013. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches Third Edition, Terjemah, Achmad Fawaid, Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Dye, T. R. (1978). Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc Hadi, Usman. 2019. Yogya Rawan Konflik Politik Identitas, Pemkot Harap Tak Ada Provokasi., diakses melalui https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4454173/yogya-rawan konflik-politik-identitas-pemkot-harap-tak-ada-provokasi
Holland, Ivar S., et al. 2011. Social vulnerability assessment for Norway: A quantitative approach. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp: 1-17, doi: 10.1080/00291951.2010.550167
Ibrahim, J. (2024). KRIMINALITAS, HEGEMONI, DAN POLITIK: PREMANISME DI YOGYAKARTA PADA MASA ORDE BARU. Jurnal Kawistara, 14(1), 18-37.
Kamil, Ihsan Kamil. 2017. Peran Panitia Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Upaya Meminimalisasi Konflik Horizontal Antar Sesama Pemilihan Kepala Daerah/Wakil Kepala Daerah Di Kabupaten Aceh Singkil (Pendekatan Siyasah Syar'iyah). Skripsi Fakultas Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum. Medan: Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Karim, Abdul Gaffar et al. 2019. Peta Kerawanan Pemilu di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta: Pengalaman Pemilu Serentak 2019. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada
Kay, A. (2006). The dynamic of public policy: Theory and evidence. Edward Elgar Publishing
Kertati, Indra. 2020. Kerawanan Sosial dalam Perspektif Inklusi. Majalah Ilmiah FISIP UNTAG Semarang, Vol. 1, No. 21
Rohmawati, Yuli. 2016. Perubahan Elektabilitas Partai Peserta Pemilu Di Yogyakarta Tahun 1971 1999. Avatara E-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, Vol. 4, No. 2 data
Rusqiyati, Eka Arifa Rusqiyati dan Heppy Ratna Sari (ed.). 2018. Panwaslu Yogyakarta temukan 1.251 bermasalah di DPS Pemilu 2019., diakses melalui https://www.antaranews.com/berita/724721/panwaslu-yogyakarta-temukan-1251 data-bermasalah-di-dps-pemilu-2019
Salim, M Nazir. 2018. Pemilihan Umum 1951 di Yogyakarta: Dari Yogyakarta Membangun Demokrasi - Jogja Memilih. Dinas Kebudayaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Santoso, Topo. 2016. Kajian Kebijakan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Pemilu.
Setyawan, Dedi et all. 2018. Analisis Potensi Desa Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis. Jurnal Geodesi Universitas Diponegoro, Vol. 7, No. 4
Silalahi, Ulber. 2009. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011 Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Surbakti, Ramlan Surbakti dan Kris Nugroho. 2015. Studi Tentang Desain Kelembagaan Pemilu yang Efektif. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan
Tangkilisan, Hessel Nogi S. 2003. Kebijakan Publik yang Membumi: Konsep, Strategi, dan Kasus. Yogyakarta: Lukman Offset dan YPASI
Tika, M. Pabundu. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Geografi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
_______. 2019. Mahfud MD Sebut Politik Identitas Ancam Keutuhan Bangsa., diakses melalui https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190209014050-32-367654/mahfud-md sebut-politik-identitas-ancam-keutuhan-bangsa
_______. 2023. Dinamika Sistem Pemerintahan di Kota Yogyakarta (Seri 2 Selesai)., diakses melalui https://warta.jogjakota.go.id/detail/index/27568 _
______. Penanganan Konflik Sosial., diakses melalui https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/267
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
