PERKEMBANGAN KEBUDAYAAN AUSTRONESIA DI KAWASAN ASIA TENGGARA DAN SEKITARNYA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kebudayaan Austronesia menyebar di wilayah Asia Tenggara dan sekitarnya hingga ke kepulauan Pasifik dan Madagaskar. Kebudayaan ini berasal dari Taiwan atau Formosa. Persebaran budaya penutur bahasa Austronesia di Asia Tenggara berpengaruh besar dalam mengembangkan budaya yang masih bertahan sampai masa sekarang. Pengaruh tersebut dapat dilihat pada budaya maritim, budaya pertanian, dan juga dalam aspek-aspek sosial seperti pemujaan terhadap leluhur atau dewa/dewi. Hal ini menjadi penting dalam upaya memperkuat identitas penutur bahasa Austronesia sebagai satu-satunya komunitas yang punya peranan begitu besar di Asia Tenggara. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah bagaimana proses persebaran penutur bahasa Austronesia dan pengaruhnya dalam kebudayaan di Asia Tenggara. Aspek yang diteliti adalah perkembangan kebudayaan dan masyarakat yang bertutur bahasa Austronesia pada periode 4500-1500 tahun lalu dan penjelajahan Austronesia menyeberangi Samudera Hindia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi pustaka dan pengamatan dengan pendekatan metode kualitatif. Penelitian ini membuktikan peranan besar penutur bahasa Austronesia dalam perkembangan kebudayaan di Asia Tenggara. Hasil dari penelitiaan bahwa adanya peranan besar penutur bahasa Austonesia dalam berbagai hal seperti kebudayaan maritim, budaya agraris, ritual penguburan dan juga kepercayaan pada leluhur.
Austronesian culture spread out in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas until Pacific Archipelago and Madagascar. This culture came from Taiwan or Formosa. The development of Austronesian speakers has a big influence on develop culture who still survive until now. That influence can be seen in maritime culture, agricultural culture, and social aspects as worship the ancestor or God/Goddess. This thing is important for makes Austronesian speakers stronger as the one and only community who has big part for Southeast Asia culture. The problem is how the process of the spread of speakers of Austronesian languages and their influence in culture in Southeast Asia. The aspect that studied is the development from Taiwan to all regions of Southeast Asia Islands within a period of time 4500-1500 years ago and the exploration of Austronesian crossing the Indian ocean. This research method was conducted using a qualitative descriptive that explain the problem on the object. Data collection techniques with literature review. The data that collected in this research is qualitative. An analysis technique used in this research is a systematic qualitative analysis of Austronesian culture development. The results of the research that their major role Austronesian languages in various things such as technology of boat building, maritime culture, agrarian culture, burial rituals, and belief in ancestors.
Article Details
References
Ballard, Chris, et al. 2003. “The Ship as Symbol in the Prehistory of Scandinavia and Southeast Asia”. World Archaeology, Vol. 35, No. 3, Seascapes, pp. 385-403.
Bellwood, Peter. 1975. Man’s Conquest of The Pasific. Auckland: Collins.
Bellwood, Peter. 1995.“Austronesian Prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland, Expansion and Transformation”. Hlm 96-111 dalam Peter Bellwod,
James J. Fox, Darrell Tryon (eds). The Austronesian: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Canberra: Australian National University.
Bellwood, Peter. 2000. Prasejarah Kepulauan Indo-Malaysia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Bellwood, Peter. 2007. Prehistory of The Indo-Malaysian Archipelago (3rd Edition). ANU E Press. Canberra.
Bellwood, Peter. 2017. First Islander: Prehistory and Human Migration in Island Southeast Asia. USA: Wiley Blackwell.
Blust, Robert. 1984. “Austronesian Culture History: Some Linguistic Interference and their Relation to Archaeological Record” Hlm 218-241 dalam Peter Van de Velde, eds., Prehistoric Indonesia. USA: Foris Publication.
Blust, Robert. 1984/1985. “The Austronesia Homeland: A Linguistic Perspective”.Asian Perspectives 26 (1): 45-68. Hawai’I University Press.
Blust, Robert. 2017. “Historical Linguistics and Anrchaeology: An Uneasy Alliance”. Hlm. 276-291 dalam: Philip J. Piper at al. New Perspectives in Southeast Asian and Pacific Prehistory. Canbera: ANU press.
Chazine, Jean-Michel. 2005. “Rock Art, Burial and Habitation: caves in east Kalimantan”. Asian Perspective 44 (1): 219-230. Hawai’I University Press.
Golson, Jack. 1990. “No room ast The Top: Agliculture Intensification in New Guinea Highland”. Hlm 601-638 dalam J. Allen, J. Golson, dan R. Jones ed., Sunda and Sahul: Prehistoric Studies in South-East Asia, Melanesia and Australia, London: Academic press.
Horridge, A. 2006. “The Austronesian Conquest of The Sea”. Hlm 143-146 dalam: P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox dan D. Tryon, eds. The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Canberra: ANU E Press.
Manguin, P.Y. 1986. “Shipshape Societies: Boat Symbolism and Political Systems in Insular Southeast Asia”. Hlm 187-213 dalam D.G. Marr and A.C. Milner (eds), Southeast Asia in 9th to 14th Centuries. Canberra: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies and Research School of Pasific Studies, Australian National University.
Parthadiningrat, KRT. 1988. Bersih Dhusun, Merti Dhusun, Merdi Dhusun Utawi Rasulan Sakeplasan. Yogyakarta: Jarahnitra.
Prasetyo, Bagyo. 2006.“Austronesian Prehistory from the Perspective of Comparative Megalithic”. Hlm 163-173 dalam Truman Simanjuntak, Inggrid H.E. Pojoh, Mohammad Hisyam. Eds, Austronesian Diaspora and the Ethnogeneses of People in Indonesian Archipelago. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Sairin, Sjafri. 2002. Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Indonesia, Perspektif Antropologi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sillitoe, Paul. 2007. Hlm. 330-336 dalam Umbrello Albarela, Keith Doubney, Anton Ervynck dan Peter Rowley-Conwy (eds), Pigs and Human 10.000 Years of Interaction, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Spriggs, M. 2003. Chronology of the Neolithic transition in Island Southeast Asia an the Western Pacitifc: a view from 2003. Review of Archaeology 24 (2): 57-80.
Tan, Melly G. 1981. Masalah Perencanaan Penelitian dalam Metode-Metode Penelitian Arkeologi. Jakarta: Gramedia
Tanudirjo, Daud Aris. 2002. Arkeologi Indonesia Dalam Konteks Proses Global. Makalah disampaikan dalam PIA IX dan Kongres IAAI, Kediri.
Utomo, Bambang Budi (Editor). 2007. Pandanglah Laut Sebagai Pemersatu Bangsa. Departemen Kebudayaan Dan Pariwisata.
Wasita. 1999. “Faktor Pendukung Budidaya Padi Pada Masa Prasejarah”. Naditira Widya 3 (1): 61-69.