Measuring High School Students’ Reading Literacy: A Case Study in North Kalimantan Province

Main Article Content

Bayu Permana Sukma
Reza Amarta Prayoga
Tri Amanat
Indah Okitasari
Retno Hendrastuti
Rolando P. Quinones Jr.
Tyka Rahman

Abstract

Reading is a fundamental tool for gleaning information and engaging in many fields of literacy. However, poor reading outcomes among Indonesian students on the PISA test indicate a low literacy level. The reading ability referred to in this study is the ability to understand reading texts on various topics and forms. This study used a sample of 234 students from eight schools in North Kalimantan Province. The data were obtained from reading tests carried out by students via computers. The test consists of 40 multiple-choice questions, short answers, and essays. The data was processed in several stages, including data reduction and item calibration using the Rasch Model. Apart from reading tests, data were also obtained through questionnaires to gather information about literacy activities carried out by students at school and at home. The results showed that nationally the average reading literacy ability of students in North Kalimantan Province was at a low level, namely at score 349, while the highest reading literacy ability average score in Indonesia was 489. The results also showed that there was a relationship between students' reading literacy skills and their conditions and habits at home. As a recommendation, students need to be more accustomed to reading multimodal texts through multimedia devices. It is important to make them capable of understanding texts containing not only words, but also pictures, numbers, graphs, and tables as demands for modern literacy. Moreover, parents also need to be to encourage to help improve the students’ literacy capacity. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sukma, B. P., Prayoga, R. A., Amanat, T., Okitasari, I., Hendrastuti, R., Quinones Jr., R. P., & Rahman, T. (2025). Measuring High School Students’ Reading Literacy: A Case Study in North Kalimantan Province.  Southeast Asian Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.55981/salls.2025.13083
Section
Articles

References

Adeed. (2019). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Pertahanan Negara. Siedoo.Com.

Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., & Joshi, R. M. (2020). Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9

Andini, I. M., Wiyono, B. B., & Hasanah, M. (2021). Zona Literasi Berbasis Teks Multimodal di Sekolah Dasar 'Multimodal Text-Based Literacy Zone in Primary Schools'. 1930–1935.

Asyhari, A. (2015). Profil peningkatan kemampuan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran saintifik ‘Profile of improving students' science literacy through scientific learning’. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v4i2.91

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2018). Laporan Kajian Bahan Kebijakan Teknis Literasi Nasional ‘National Literacy Technical Policy Material Review Report’. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa.

Burkins, J. M., & Yates, K. (2021). Shifting the Balance: 6 Ways to Bring the Science of Reading into The Balanced Literacy Classroom. Stenhouse Publisher.

Cook, W. L., & Douglas, E. M. (1998). The looking-glass self in family context: A social relations analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.12.3.299

Cooley, C. H. (1983). Human Nature and The Social Order. In Reprint, New York: Schocken (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789513

Emilia, E., Palupi, D., & Kusumawardani, F. (2019). A Fresh Look at Students’ Ability to Read Multimodal Texts: A Case in Indonesia. 2nd International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2019), 243–253.

Emmitt, M., Pollock, J., & Komesaroff, L. (2014). Language and learning: An introduction for teaching (Sixth). Oxford University Press.

Engel, U., Jann, B., Lynn, P., Scherpenzeel, A., & Sturgis, P. (2015). Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research. Routledge.

Fadhilah, N. A. (2020). Analisis Wacana Kritis Pemberitaan Penyandang Disabilitas Mental (PDM) di Detik.com ‘Critical Discourse Analysis of News Coverage of People with Mental Disabilities on Detik.com.’ repository.uinjkt.ac.id. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/54800%0Ahttp://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/54800/1/NADIA AYU FADHILA-FDK.pdf

Fogarty, R. J., Kerns, G. M., & Pete, B. M. (2021). Literacy Reframed: How a Focus on Decoding, Vocabulary, and Background Knowledge Improves Reading Comprehension. In Solution Tree Press.

Franks, D. D., & Gecas, V. (1992). Autonomy and Conformity in Cooley’s Self‐Theory: The Looking‐Glass Self and Beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 15(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1992.15.1.49

Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca pada Program PISA ‘Characteristics of Reading Literacy Questions in the PISA Programme’. Litera, 17(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.19048

Harsiati, T., & Priyatni, E. T. (2017). Karakteristik Tes Literasi Membaca Pada Programme for International Student Asessment (PISA) ‘Characteristics of Reading Literacy Tests in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)’. BIBLIOTIKA: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17977/um008v1i22017p001

Hasanah, U. (2019). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Literasi Membaca untuk Meningkatkan Daya Baca Siswa ‘Developing Reading Literacy Learning to Improve Students' Reading Skills. Media Pustakawan, 26(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v26i2.184

Ibrahim, G. A. (2017). PISA dan Daya Baca Bangsa ‘PISA and National Reading Literacy’. Kompas.com.

Juditha, C. (2013). Literasi media pada anak di daerah perbatasan Indonesia dan Timor Leste ‘Media literacy among children in the border regions of Indonesia and Timor Leste’. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komunikasi, 15(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.33164/iptekkom.15.1.2013.47-62

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Peta Jalan Gerakan Literasi Nasional ‘Roadmap of the National Literacy Movement’. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lamprianou, I. (2020). Applying the Rasch Model in Social Science Using R and Bluesky Statistic. Routledge.

Mubarok, H., & Sofiana, N. (2017). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Reading Motivation: Examining the Effect on Students’ Reading Ability. Lingua Cultura, 11(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v11i2.1824

OECD. (2018). Indonesia-Country Note – Results from PISA 2015. website: www.oecd.org/pisa

Parwati, S. A. P. E., Nitayadnya, I. W., & Sudiana, I. M. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Pelajar SMA/SMK di Kabupaten Klungkung ‘Literacy Skills of High School Students in Klungkung Regency’. Telaga Bahasa, 7(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.36843/tb.v7i2.75

Poloma, M. M. (2010). Sosiologi Kontemporer ‘Contemporary Sociology’, terj. Yasogama (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010).

Punter, R. A., Glas, C. A. W., & Meelissen, M. R. M. (2016). Psychometric Framework for Modeling Parental Involvement and Reading. Springer.

Rahim, F. (2008). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar ‘Teaching Reading in Primary Schools’. Sinar Grafika.

Ross, H., Stein, N., Trabasso, T., Woody, E., & Ross, M. (2005). The quality of family relationships within and across generations: A social relations analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000351

Sabatini, J. P., O’Reilly, T., Halderman, L. K., & Bruce, K. (2014). Integrating scenario-based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(36–43). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1029985

Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 ‘Scientific Learning for the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum’. Bumi Aksara.

Santi, K. L., & Reed, D. K. (2015). Improving Reading Comprehension of Middle and High School Students. Springer.

Scherer, L. (2016). Children, Literacy and Ethnicity: Reading Identities in the Primary School. Palgrave Macmillan.

Silva, C. S., & Calheiros, M. M. (2022). Youth’s Self-Construction in The Context of Residential Care: The Looking-Glass Self within The Youth-Caregiver Relationship. Children and Youth Services Review, 132, 106328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106328

Soerjono, S. (2004). Sosiologi Keluarga ‘Family Sociology’. Rineka Cipta.

Spence, L., & Mitra, A. (2023). Educational Neuroscience for Literacy Teachers. In Educational Neuroscience for Literacy Teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003256199

Tahmidaten, L., & Krismanto, W. (2020). Permasalahan Budaya Membaca di Indonesia (Studi Pustaka tentang Problematika & Solusinya) ‘The Problem of Reading Culture in Indonesia (A Literature Review of the Issues and Solutions)’. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i1.p22-33

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik ‘Building Science Literacy Among Students’. Humaniora.

Umar, M. (2015). Peranan Orang Tua dalam Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Anak ‘The role of Parents in Improving Children's Academic Achievement’. 'Jurnal Edukasi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 1(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.22373./je.v1i1.315

Zhang, Y. (2022). Assessing Literacy in a Digital World: Validating A Scenario-Based Reading-to-write Assessment. In Springer.