Violation of the Cooperative Principle in the Mata Najwa Talk Show, Episode “3 Bacapres Bicara Gagasan”

Main Article Content

Prima Hariyanto
Muhammad Wildan Suyuti
Nuri Hermawan

Abstract

The Presidential Election in Indonesia has always been a major event that gives rise to various aspects of communication. The Mata Najwa talk show edition “3 Presidential Candidates Discuss Ideas” received significant attention from the public and observers. This study aims to explain the forms of violations, the pragmatic functions of the violations, and the factors influencing the occurrence of violations of the cooperative principle in the Mata Najwa on Stage Yogyakarta edition “3 Presidential Candidates Discuss Ideas.” This research is a descriptive qualitative study. Data analysis employed a pragmatic equivalent approach. Based on the percentage, Anies Baswedan most frequently adhered to the cooperative principle, namely 29 times (72.50%), whereas Prabowo Subianto most frequently violated the cooperative principle, namely 15 times (38.46%). The pragmatic functions identified were assertive, directive, and expressive. The violations of the cooperative principle were in the form of violations of the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner. The factors influencing the occurrence of violations of the cooperative principle were sustaining communication, modesty, providing additional information, concealing messages/contradictions/predictions, covering up intentions, and preserving reputation. These findings contribute to the advancement of political discourse research by revealing how presidential candidates strategically employ conversational violations to achieve specific communicative goals, offering practical insights for understanding political communication strategies and their effects on public perception during electoral processes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hariyanto, P., Suyuti, M. W., & Hermawan, N. (2025). Violation of the Cooperative Principle in the Mata Najwa Talk Show, Episode “3 Bacapres Bicara Gagasan”.  Southeast Asian Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55981/salls.2025.13328
Section
Articles

References

Ahlsen, E. (1993). Conversational principles and aphasic communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 19. 57—70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90070-6

Arvianto, F. (2019). An Analysis of the Cooperative Principle in the Comedy Show Extravaganza. Jubindo: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 4(1), 54–60.

https://doi.org/10.32938/jbi.v4i1.151

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University. Press.

Citra, Y., & Fatmawati. (2021). Reasons for Violations of Grice’s Cooperative Principle in the Mata Najwa Program on Trans 7. Onoma Journal: Education, Language, and Literature, 7(2), 437–448.

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i2.1278

Dalman, R.C. (2022). Conveying meaning in legal language e - Why the language of legislation needs to be more explicit than ordinary language. Journal of Pragmatics. 198. 43—54.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.009

Dewi, A.N.C. & Rahman, Y. (2021). Pelanggaran Maksim Percakapan pada Prinsip Kerjasama Grice dalam Film Ballon Tahun 2018 Karya Michael Herbig. E-Journal Identitaet, 10(02), 1—11.

https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/identitaet/article/view/41029

Efendi, A. L., Fadilla, A., Khoirunnisa, A. C., Bakry, G. N., & Aristi, N. (2023). Analisis jaringan komunikasi #Pilpres2024 pada platform Twitter. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 22(2), 219–232.

https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v22i2.2976

Fatmawati, R. N. (2022). Reasons for Violations of the Maxim of Manner/Implementation in Grice’s Cooperative Principle in the Culture of Riau Society. Sintaks: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature, 2(2), 130–136.

https://doi.org/10.57251/sin.v2i2.486

Grice, H. P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation”. Speech Acts [Syntax and Semantics 3], Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.

Hasanah, H. (2021). Maxim Violations in Creating Humor: A Comparative Study between Madurese Humor and

Javanese Humor. Sawerigading, 27(2), 205–218.

https://sawerigading.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/sawerigading/article/view/927/430

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Etnhographic Approach. Philadelpia: The University of Pensylvinia.

KPK. (2023). User Manual Sistem Informasi LHKPN (E-LHKPN).

https://elhkpn.kpk.go.id//download/User%20Manual%20e-lhkpn%20eksternal%20-%20v1.4.pdf

Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York: Longman.

Lemhanas. (2022). 2024 Election: Time for Democracy of Ideas, Not Democracy of Cult Worship.

https://www.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/publikasi/press-release/1670-pemilu-2024-waktunya-demokrasigagasan-bukan-demokrasi-pengkultusan, accessed December 11, 2023.

Compliance and Violation of the Cooperative Principle in Premen Pensiun The Movie. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 16–22.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jsi/article/view/39957

LHKPN. (2023). Announcement of State Officials’ Wealth Report: Anies Rasyid Baswedan. Jakarta: Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia. https://elhkpn.kpk.go.id/portal/user/PreviewAnnoun/104251470

Malayu, S.M., Muliadi, Y.A., Mayasari, L. (2013). Aimai in Japanese Implicature: A Pragmatic Study. Migration Letters, 20(5), 713—727. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i5.4060

Moghaddam, M.M. (2019). Towards a Cognitively-Mediated Conceptualisation of the Cooperative Principle: An Introduction to the Maxim of Diplomacy. In Alessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications. Springer Verlag. 469-490.

https://philpapers.org/rec/MORTAC-19

Nadar, F. (2013). Pragmatics and Pragmatic Research. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Osman, Z. & Yusoff, N. (2010). Rhetoric in Scientific Writing: Evaluation Based on Grice’s Cooperative Principle.

International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics (IJLEAL), 9(1), 69–83.

https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v9.1196

Prasasti, P.A., Rahmat, A.A., Arginingrum, P.S., Arwansyah, Y.B., & Utomo, A.P.Y. (2022). Analysis of the Cooperative Principle in Stand-Up Comedy Season 2. Khatulistiwa: Journal of Education and Social Humanities, 2(2), 129–140.

https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v2i2.491

Rani, S. (2020). Dinamika Komunikasi Politik Pada Pemilihan Presiden Di Indonesia. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 18(2), 72-85.

https://doi.org/10.18592/ALHADHARAH.V18I2.3379

Rukmorini, R. (2023). Bertahan hingga Malam demi Mendengar Gagasan Tiga Bakal Capres,

https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2023/09/20/malam-menunggu-paparan-gagasan-para-bacapres, diakses 11 Desember 2023.

Saleh, F., Yusuf, R., Wahyuni, I., Hermansyah, S., & Risdayanti, R. (2023). The Cooperative Principle in the Bugis Short Comedy Film “Ambo Nai Anak Jalanan”: A Pragmatic Study. Idiomatik: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 6(1), 107–115.

https://doi.org/10.46918/idiomatik.v6i1.1868

Searle. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in The Theory of Speech Act. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on Criminal Law Regulations, amended by (1) Law No. 73 of 1958 on the Enactment of Law No. 1 of 1946 of the Republic of Indonesia Regarding Criminal Law Regulations for the Entire Territory of the Republic of Indonesia and Amending the Criminal Code; (2) Law No. 4 of 1976 on Amendments and Additions to Several Articles in the Criminal Code Related to the Expansion of the Application of Criminal Legislation, Aviation Crimes, and Crimes Against Aviation Facilities/Infrastructure; and (3) Law No. 27 of 1999 on Amendments to the Codes of Law Relating to Crimes Against State Security.

Wijana, I.D.P. (1996). Fundamentals of Pragmatics. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatics. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.