Dose Distribution Analysis of Proton Therapy for Medulloblastoma Cancer with PHITS 3.24
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2022.24.1.6581Keywords:
Proton therapy, Passive scattering, Pencil beam scanning, Posterior fossa boost, MedulloblastomaAbstract
One of the developments in particle therapy is proton radiation therapy. Research related to proton therapy is difficult due to a limited number of available proton therapy facilities. Therefore, there is a need for alternative proton therapy simulations using programs other than those in proton therapy facilities. This research was aimed to simulate medulloblastoma brain cancer which is most common in children. The program used in this research was PHITS version 3.24. The human body was modeled with the revised ORNL-MIRD phantom for a 10-year-old child. The therapy scheme was a whole posterior fossa boost of 19.8 Gy RBE. The proton passive scattering was simulated by passing a uniform proton beam through the aperture and compensator with various energy levels. The proton pencil beam scanning was simulated with small cylindrical beams with a radius of 0.5 cm, which were adjusted to the planning target volume with layers variations. The total duration of the prescription dose given was 550 seconds with passive scattering and 605 seconds with pencil beam scanning. In passive scattering, the OAR(s) with the most significant percentage of absorbed dose were the skin, cranium, and muscle, i.e., 8.22 ± 0.15%, 5.51 ± 0.05%, and 1.39 ± 0.04% respectively to their maximum tolerated dose. For the pencil beam scanning, the OAR(s) with the most significant percentage of absorbed dose were the skin, cranium, and muscle, i.e., 5.42 ± 0.08%, 4.43 ± 0.05 %, and 0.51 ± 0.05% respectively to their maximum tolerated dose. In terms of dose homogeneity, dose distribution in passive scattering was relatively better than in pencil beam scanning using dose sampling analysis at some points within the planning target volume.
References
Paganetti H., Proton Therapy Physics(Series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering). 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?id=RK2W6SA2XKKOWQ.
https://doi.org/10.1201/b11448
Yeon Soo Yeom et al., Computation Speeds and Memory Requirements of Mesh-Type ICRP Reference Computational Phantoms in Geant4, MCNP6, and PHITS., Health Phys. 2019. 116(5):664-676.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000999
Aksungur B., "Medulloblastoma : Diagnosis , Treatment And Prognosis," Master's Thesis. 2016.
Aman R. A., et al., "Panduan Penatalaksanaan Tumor Otak," 2016. Available:http://kanker.kemkes.go.id/guidelines.php?id=5
BPJS Kesehatan, "Laporan Pengelolaan Program Tahun 2019 & Laporan Keuangan Tahun 2019 (Auditan)." Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan, Jakarta Pusat.
Yeom Y. S., Han M. C., Kim C. H., Jeong J. H., Conversion of ICRP Male Reference Phantom to Polygon-surface Phantom. Phys Med Biol. 2013. 58(19):6985-7007.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/19/6985
Sanchez-Parcerisa D., and Udías J., "Teaching Treatment Planning for Protons with Educational Open-source Software: Experience with FoCa and MatRad," J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2018. 19 (4): 302-306.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12326
Sato T. et al., "Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02," J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2018. 55 (6):684-690.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
Carter L. M., Ocampo Ramos J. C., Kesner A. L., Personalized Dosimetry of 177 Lu-DOTATATE: a Comparison of Organ- and Voxel-level Approaches using Open-access ImagesBiomed Phys Eng Express. 2021. 7(5): 34271565.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac1550
Ute Linz and Jose Alonso., Laser-driven Ion Accelerators for Tumor Therapy Revisited Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams., 2016. 19: 124802.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.124802
Yong Ho Chin, Alexander Wu Chao, and Michael M. Blaskiewicz, Two Particle Model for Studying the Effects of Space-Charge Force on Strong Head-tail Instabilities., Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams. 2016. 19: 014201.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.014201
Ostrom Q., T., et al., "CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011," Neuro. Oncol., 2014. 16(4): iv1-iv63.
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou223
Ramaswamy V., et al., Medulloblastoma Subgroup-specific Outcomes in Irradiated Children: Who are the True High-risk Patients?," Neuro. Oncol., 2016. 18(2) 291-297.
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou357
Lukas M. C., et al., PARaDIM: A PHITS-Based Monte Carlo Tool for Internal Dosimetry with Tetrahedral Mesh Computational Phantoms., J Nucl Med. 2019. 60(12): 1802-1811.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229013
Cubillos-Mesías M., et al., "Impact of Robust Treatment Planning on Single- and Multi-Field Optimized Plans for Proton Beam Therapy of UnilateralHhead and Neck Target Volumes," Radiat. Oncol. 2017. 12(1)190-199.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0931-8
Dörr W., Herrmann T., and Trott K., Normal Tissue Tolerance. 2017. 6 (5) 840-851.
https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2017.06.45
Dionisi F., et al., "Organs at Risk's Tolerance and Dose Limits for Head and Neck Cancer Re-irradiation: A literature Review," Oral Oncol. 2019. 98 (4)35-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.017
Brodin P., and Wolfgang T. A., "Revisiting the Dose Constraints for Head and Neck OARs in the Current Era of IMRT," Oral Oncol. 2018. 18:8-18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.018
Tatsuhiko Sato et al.,Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2018. 55(6): 684-690.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
Yock T. I., et al., "Long-term Toxic Effects of Proton Radiotherapy for Paediatric Medulloblastoma: A phase 2 Single-arm Study," Lancet Oncol. 2016. 17 (3):287-298.