Environmental Consequences of Routine Releases from Small Medium Reactor at Babel Site
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2021.23.2.6239Keywords:
SMR, Consequences, Routine release, Environmental, ORIGEN2, PC-CREAMAbstract
Radiation protection and safety documents for routine conditions are required to support the licensing requirements for nuclear power plant site. This research is focused in the assessment and analysis of the results of PWR safety study related to the routine release of radioactivity from the SMR subsystems and components of the 100 MWe-type PWR along with its consequences in the site. The core inventory calculation was done using ORIGEN2 software, applying release parameters from the existing analysis and calculation results. The radiological consequences were calculated by the PC-CREAM program package. Environmental and meteorological data were obtained using Arc-GIS and spatial analysis. The Bangka Belitung (Babel) site was used as the specific footprint. Analyzing PC-CREAM output data the radiological consequences of routine operation of 3 100 MWe PWR modules on Sebagin site (South Bangka) and Muntok site (West Bangka) in 16 sectors and within a radius of 20 km were concluded. The calculation results for the Sebagin site is that the maximum dose within a radius of 500 m (exclusion zone) is 1.15E+02 μSv/year. For a radius beyond 500 m, the maximum dose is 4.71E+01 μSv/year. Whereas for Muntok site (West Bangka), the maximum dose in the exclusion area (<500m) is 9.47E+00 μSv/year, and outside exclusion area (>500m) is 3.10E+00 μSv/year. The individual dose for the Babel site in the exclusion area is below the dose constraint for non-radiation service workers as the general public of 0.3 mSv/year or 300 μSv/year, while the maximum dose for outside exclusion is also below the constraint as stipulated in BAPETEN Regulation No 4 Year 2013 on Radiation Protection and Safety.
References
Udiyani P.M., Kuntjoro S., Sunaryo G.R, Susiati H. Atmospheric Dispersion Analysis for Expected Radiation Dose due to Normal Operation of RSG-GAS and RDE Reactors. AJI. 2018. 44 (3):115-121.
https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2018.878
Udiyani P.M., Husnayani I., Deswandri, Sunaryo GR. Analysis of Radiation Safety for Small Modullar Reactor (SMR) on PWR 100 MWe type in: International Symposium of Emerging Nuclear Technology and Engineering Novelty. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 962 (2018) 012035.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012035
Udiyani P.M., and Husnayani I. Analysis of Radiation Safety in the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Site in Normal Operation Condition, Sebagin Site Study. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Nuklir Indonesia. 2017. 18 (2): 73-84.
https://doi.org/10.17146/jstni.2017.18.2.3575
Zhao Y., Zhang L.,Tong J. Development of Rapid Atmospheric Source term Estimation System for AP 1000 Nuclear Power Plant. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2015. 81: 264-275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.02.008
Udiyani PM. and Setiawan M.B. Source Term Assessment for 100 MWe Pressurerized Water Reactor. Journal of Nuclear Reactor Technology Tri Dasa Mega. 2020. 22 (2): 61-67.
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2020.22.2.5844
Winiarek A., et al. Estimation of Cesisium 137 Source term from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Using a Joint Consistent Assimilation of Air Concentration and Deposition Observations. Atmospheric Environment. 2014. 82: 268-279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.017
Sadiq A.A., Ramli A.T., Saleh M.A. Assessment of Potential Human Health and Environmental Impacts of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Based on Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling. Atmósfera, 2015. 28 (1): 13-26.
https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2015.28.01.02
Lujanien G., et al. Plutonium Isotopes and 241Am in the Atmosphere of Lithuania: A Comparison of Different Source terms. Atmospheric Environment. 2012. 61: 419-427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.046
Pirouzmand A., Dehghani P., Hadad K., Nematollahi, M. Dose Assessment of Radionuclides Dispersion from Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant Stack under Normal Operation and Accident Conditions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015. 40: 15198-15205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.043
Sohrabi M., Parsouzi Z., Amrollahi R., Khamooshy C., Ghasemi M. Public Exposure from Environmental Release of Radioactive Material under Normal Operation of Unit-1 Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2013. 55: 351-358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.12.002
Ragaišis V., Poškas P., Šimonis V., Šmaižys A., Kilda R., Grigaliūnienė D. The Environmental Impact Assessment Process for Nuclear Facilities: A review of the Lithuanian Practice and Experience, Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2014. 73: 129-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.014
Yang YH., Lee GB., Shon SH., Kim JY. Assessment of Long-term Trend for Environmental radioactivity around Wolsong nuclear power plant in Korea. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2015. 77: 231-237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.09.061
Hirose K. Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant accident: Atmospheric and Oceanic Impacts Over the Fve Years. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2016. 157: 113-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.01.011
Lee J.K., Kim J.C.,Lee K.J, Belorid M., Beeley P.A., Yun J.I., Assessment of Wind Characteristics and Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling of 137Cs on The Barakah NPP Area in The UAE, Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2014. 46: 557-568.