Criticality Safety Analysis of the Dry Cask Design with Air Gaps for RDNK Spent Pebble Fuels Storage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2021.23.3.6355Keywords:
Dry Cask, Air Gaps, Criticality, Spent FuelAbstract
Reaktor Daya Non-Komersial (RDNK) with a 10 MW thermal power has been proposed as one of the technology options for the first nuclear power plant program in Indonesia. The reactor is a High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor-type with spherical fuel elements called pebbles. To support this program, it is necessary to prepare dry cask to safely store the spent pebble fuels that will be generated by the RDNK. The dry cask design has been proposed based on the Castor THTR/AVR but modified with air gaps to facilitate decay heat removal. The objective of this study is to evaluate criticality safety through keff value of the proposed dry cask design for the RDNK spent fuel. The keff values were calculated using MCNP5 program for the dry cask with 25, 50, 75, and 100% of canister capacity. The values were calculated for dry casks with and without air gaps in normal, submerged, tumbled, and both tumbled and submerged conditions. The results of calculated keff values for the dry cask with air gaps at 100% of canister capacity from the former to the latter conditions were 0.127, 0.539, 0.123, and 0.539, respectively. These keff values were smaller than the criticality threshold value of 0.95. Therefore, it can be concluded that the dry cask with air gaps design comply the criticality safety criteria in the aforementioned conditions.
References
Liem P.H., Sembiring T.M., Tran H.N. Evaluation on Fuel Cycle and Loading Scheme of The Indonesian Experimental Power Reactor (RDE) Design. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2018. 340:245-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.10.004
Sato H., Aoki T., Ohashi H., Yan X.L. Research and Development for Safety and Licensing of HTGR Cogeneration System. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2020. 360:110493.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110493
Fang C., Morris R., Li F. Safety Features of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2017. 2017:3-6.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9160971
Dungan K., Gregg R.W.H., Morris K., Livens F.R., Butler G. Assessment of the Disposability of Radioactive Waste Inventories for a Range of Nuclear Fuel Cycles: Inventory and Evolution Over Time. Energy. 2021. 221:119826.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119826
International Atomic Energy Agency Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management. Vienna:IAEA; 2018.
Ewing R.C., Whittleston R.A., Yardley B.W.D. Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste: A Primer Elements. 2016. 12(4):233-237.
https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.12.4.233
Ewing R.C. Long-term Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Nat. Mater. 2015. 14(3):252-257.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4226
Ratiko R., Wisnubroto D.S., Nasruddin N., Mahlia T.M.I. Current and Future Strategies for Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Indonesia. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2020. 32:100575.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100575
Aisyah, Mirawaty, Saputra D.L.I., Setiawan R. Characteristization of Radionuclides in Spent Fuel from Experimental Pebble Bed Reactor. Urania. 2019. 25(1):45-58.
https://doi.org/10.17146/urania.2019.25.1.5024
Ratiko R., Samudera S.A., Hindami R., Siahaan A.T., Naldi L., Safitri D.H., et al. Optimization of Dry Storage for Spent Fuel from G.A. Siwabessy Nuclear Research Reactor. Int. J. Technol. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i1.775
Wiss T., Hiernaut J.P., Roudil D., Colle J.Y., Maugeri E., Talip Z., et al. Evolution of Spent Nuclear fuel in Dry Storage Conditions for Millennia and Beyond. J. Nucl. Mater. 2014. 451(1-3):198-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.055
Penalva J., Feria F., Herranz L.E. Thermal Performance of a Concrete Cask: Methodology to Model Helium Leakage from the Steel Canister. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2017. 108:229-238.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.049
U.S.NRC NUREG-225: Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Final Report. 2020.
IAEA IAEA Safety Standards: Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-15 (Rev.1). 2020.
Costa D.A., Cournoyer M.E., Merhege J.F., Garcia V.E., Sandoval A.N. A Primer on Criticality Safety. J. Chem. Heal. Saf. 2017. 24(3):7-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2016.12.001
Yang Y., Chen M., Lu C. Introducing Time in Derivation of the Scaling Factor for MCNP Criticality Calculations. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2016. 87:385-387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.09.020
Abrefah R.G., Birikorang S.A., Nyarko B.J.B., Fletcher J.J., Akaho E.H.K. Design of Serpentine Cask for Ghana Research Reactor-1 Spent Nuclear Fuel. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2014. 77:84-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.06.011
Mohammadi A., Hassanzadeh M., Gharib M. Shielding Calculation and Criticality Safety Analysis of Spent Fuel Transportation Cask in Research Reactors. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016. 108:129-132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.12.045
Velasquez C.E., Sousa R. V., Fortini A., Pereira C., Costa A.L., Da Silva C.A.M., et al. Spent Fuel Criticality and Compositions Evaluation for Long-term Disposal in a Generic Cask. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2014. 275:168-178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.021
Verfondern K. AVR Decommissioning. IAEA Mission to PTLR-BATAN on HTGR Decommissioning and Waste, Jakarta, Indonesia, May 15-19, 2017.
