Dose Estimation of the BNCT Water Phantom Based on MCNPX Computer Code Simulation

Authors

  • Amanda Dhyan Purna Ramadhani Department of Physics, Mathematics and Natural Science Faculty, State University of Semarang
  • Susilo Department of Physics, Mathematics and Natural Science Faculty, State University of Semarang
  • Irfan Nurfatthan Department of Nuclear Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Yohannes Sardjono Centre of Accelerator Science and Technology,National Nuclear Energy Agency
  • Widarto Centre of Accelerator Science and Technology,National Nuclear Energy Agency
  • Gede Sutresna Wijaya Centre of Accelerator Science and Technology,National Nuclear Energy Agency
  • Isman Mulyadi Triatmoko Centre of Accelerator Science and Technology,National Nuclear Energy Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2020.22.1.5780

Keywords:

BNCT, Dose, Cancer, Water Phantom, MCNPX

Abstract

Cancer is a malignant tumor that destroys healthy cells. Cancer treatment can be done by several methods, one of which is BNCT. BNCT uses 10B target which is injected into the human body, then it is irradiated with thermal or epithermal neutrons. Nuclear reaction will occur between boron and neutrons, producing alpha particle and lithium-7. The dose is estimated by how much boron and neutron should be given to the patient as a sum of number of boron, number of neutrons, number of protons, and number of gamma in the reaction of the boron and neutron. To calculate the dose, the authors simulated the reaction with Monte Carlo N Particle-X computer code. A water phantom was used to represent the human torso, as 75% of human body consists of water. Geometry designed in MCNPX is in cubic form containing water and a cancer cell with a radius of 2 cm. Neutron irradiation is simulated as originated from Kartini research reactor, modeled in cylindrical form to represent its aperture. The resulting total dose rate needed to destroy the cancer cell in GTV is 2.0814×1014 Gy.s (76,38%) with an irradiation time of 1,4414×10-13 s. In PTV the dose is 5.2295×1013 Gy.s (19,19%) with irradiation time of 5.7367×10-13 s. In CTV, required dose is 1.1866×1013 Gy.s (4,35%) with an irradiation time of 2.5283×10-12 s. In the water it is 1.9128×1011 Gy.s (0,07%) with an irradiation time of 1,5684×10-10 s. The irradiation time is extremely short since the modeling is based on water phantom instead of human body.

References

National Cancer Institute. What is cancer? Understanding Cancer. Accesed form: https://www.cancer.gov/aboutcancer/understanding/what-is-cancer, 2 September 2019

Shahban, M., Hussain, B., Mehmood, K., & Rehman, S. U.Estimation of peripheral dose from Co60 beam in water phantom measured in Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, Pakistan. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 22(3), 212-216. 2017

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2016.12.002

Rosidah, S., Sardjono, Y., & Sumardi, Y.. Dose Analysis of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) At Skin Cancer Melanoma Using MCNPX With Neutron Source from Thermal Column of Kartini. Indonesian Journal of Physics and Nuclear Applications, 2(3), 111-123. 2017

https://doi.org/10.24246/ijpna.v2i3.111-123

Satoh, D., Kajimoto, T., Shigyo, N., Itashiki, Y.,

Imabayashi, Y., Koba, Y., Uozumi, Y. (2016). Distributions of neutron yields anddoses around a water phantom bombardedwith 290-MeV/nucleon and 430-MeV/nucleon carbon ions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 387,10-19.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.09.011

Pozzi, E. C. C., Cardoso, J. E., Colombo, L. L., Thorp, S., Hughes, A. M., Molinari, A. J., Schwint, A. E.Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for liver metastasis: Therapeutic efficacy in an experimental model. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 51(3). 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-012-0419-8

Tesalonika, A. Dosimetry of in vitro and in vivo Trials in Thermal Column Kartini Reactor for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) facility by using MCNPX Simulator Code. Indonesian Journal of Physics and Nuclear Applications, 1(10), 63-72. 2016.

https://doi.org/10.24246/ijpna.v1i2.63-72

Sakurai, Y., Tanaka, H., Takata, T., Fujimoto, N., Suzuki, M., Masunaga, S., Maruhashi, A. Advances in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) at Kyoto University - From reactor-based BNCT to accelerator-based BNCT. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 67(1),76-81. 2015.

https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.76

IAEA Current status of neutron capture therapy. Vienna, Austria:International Atomic Energy Agency: 2001.

Hassanein, A. M., Hassan, M. H., Mohamed, N. M. A., & Abou Mandour, M. A. (2018). An optimized epithermal BNCT beam design for research reactors. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 106 (May 2017), 455-464.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.03.018

Nuclear Data Center JAEA.accesed form: https://wwwndc.jaea.go.jp/Labo/ncap.html.2019

Ramadhan Valiant Gill S Balle.In Vivo Total Dose Analysis in Mice for BNCT Trial TRIGA Kartini Research Reactor Based Using PHITS. Indonesian Journal of Physics and Nuclear Application. 2019

Wicaksono, A. S., Widiharto, A., & Sardjono, Y. (2016). Internal Dose Analysis for Radiation Worker in Cancer Therapy Based on Boron Neutron Capture Therapy with Neutron Source Cyclotron 30 MeV Using Monte Carlo N Particle Extended Simulator. Indonesian Journal of Physics and Nuclear Applications, 2(2), 91-100.

https://doi.org/10.24246/ijpna.v2i2.91-100

Paul Sherer Institut .Neutron Matter Interaction. Accesedform:https://www.psi.ch/en/niag/neutron-interaction-with-matter.2019

Aghara, S. K., Sriprisan, S. I., Singleterry, R. C., & Sato, T. (2015). Shielding evaluation for solar particle events using MCNPX, PHITS and OLTARIS codes. Life Sciences in Space Research, 4, 79-91.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2014.12.003

Downloads

Published

2020-02-24

How to Cite

Ramadhani, A. D. P., Susilo, Nurfatthan, I., Sardjono, Y., Widarto, Wijaya, G. S., & Triatmoko, I. M. (2020). Dose Estimation of the BNCT Water Phantom Based on MCNPX Computer Code Simulation. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 22(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2020.22.1.5780