Modeling of Operator’s Actions on a Nuclear Emergency Condition Using Multilevel Flow Modeling

Authors

  • Tulis Jojok Suryono Center for Nuclear Reactor Safety and Technology PTKRN-BATAN
  • Sigit Santoso Center for Nuclear Reactor Safety and Technology PTKRN-BATAN
  • Restu Maerani Center for Nuclear Reactor Safety and Technology PTKRN-BATAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2019.21.1.5303

Keywords:

Operator actions, Emergency operating procedures, Multilevel flow modeling, Control function, Nuclear Safety, Human error

Abstract

In nulear emergency condition, after determining the initiating event and the type of the anomaly, operators should take counteractions to control the reactor to mitigate the accident and to bring back the plant to the safe condition. The actions should based on emergency operating procedures. In order to minimize the human error related to the actions, some necessary information is needed. Such kind of information is the consequence of the actions, which can be derived by modeling the counteractions. Multilevel flow modeling (MFM), a functional modeling, is chosen to model the counteraction with the consideration that it is based on cause-effect relations and consequence reasoning, it provides realization relationship which corresponds physical components with their functions, and it provides comprehensive diagnosis based on human perspective of the system objectives. The counteractions are represented by the control functions in the MFM. This paper discusses how to model the counteractions and the consequences of the actions to the system components, which are necessary to enhance situation awareness and to reduce human errors.

References

Santoso S. Factors Influencing Human Reliability of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Operation. Nucl. React. Technol. Tri Dasa Mega. 2016. 18(3):135-44.

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2016.18.3.3017

Santoso S., Sudarno, Situmorang J. Development of the Human-Machine Interface Design for Control Room of Experimental Power Reactor (RDE). in: ICES International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Accepted for publishing in Journal IOP of conference series. Bandung. 2018.

Endsley M.R. Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 2015. 9(1):4-32.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343415572631

Lind M. A Goal-Function approach to analysis of control situations. in: IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFACPapersOnline). 2010. pp. 233-8.

https://doi.org/10.3182/20100831-4-FR-2021.00042

Lind M. An introduction to multilevel flow modeling. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2011. 2(1):22- 32.

Gofuku A., Inoue T., Sugihara T. A technique to generate plausible counteroperation procedures for an emergency situation based on a model expressing functions of components. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2017. 54(5):578-88.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1292966

Gofuku A., Sato T. Dynamic operation permission system for oil refinery plants. Proc. 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. Networking, Sens. Control. ICNSC 2009. 2009. 14(2):746-51.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2009.4919371

Lind M. An Overview of Multievel Flow Modeling. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2013. 4(3):186-91.

Lind M., Zhang X. Functional Modelling for Fault Diagnosis and its Applications for NPP. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2014. 46(6):753- 72.

https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.04.2014.721

Lind M. Control functions in MFM : basic principles. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2011. 2(2):132-129.

Lind M., Yoshikawa H., Jørgensen S.B., Ming Y., Tamayama K., Okusa K. Multilevel flow modeling of monju nuclear power plant. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2011. 2(3):274-84.

Heussen K., Saleem A., Lind M. Control architecture of power systems: Modeling of purpose and function. 2009 IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet. PES '09. 2009.:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2009.5275963

Suryono T.J., Gofuku A. Techniques to derive additional information of operation actions for computer-based operating procedure. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2018. 55(6):672-83.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2018.1428122

Takahisa I., Akio G. A technique to prioritize plausible counter operation procedures in an accidental situation of plants. in: Poceedings of 8th International Symposium on Symbiotic Nuclear Power 32 Tulis Jojok Suryono et al. / Tri Dasa Mega Vol. 21 No.1 (2019) 23-32 Systems for 21st Century (ISSNP 2016). Chengdu, China. 2016.

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2019.21.1.5303

Zhang X., Ravn O., Lind M. Assessing Operational Situations.Technical University of Denmark; 2015.

Gofuku A. Applications of MFM to intelligent systems for supporting plant operators and designers : function-based inference techniques. Nucl. Saf. Simul. 2011. 2(3):235-45.

Suryono T.J., Gofuku A. The Desirable Features of Computer Based Emergency Operating Procedure for Nuclear Power Operation. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016. 49(19):403-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.599

Downloads

Published

2019-02-22

How to Cite

Suryono, T. J., Santoso, S., & Maerani, R. (2019). Modeling of Operator’s Actions on a Nuclear Emergency Condition Using Multilevel Flow Modeling. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 21(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2019.21.1.5303