Development of Experimental Power Reactor (EPR) Model For Safety Analysis Using RELAP5

Authors

  • A.S. Ekariansyah Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety - BATAN
  • Muhammad Subekti Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety - BATAN
  • S. Widodo Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety - BATAN
  • H. Tjahjono Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety - BATAN
  • Susyadi Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety - BATAN
  • P.I. Wahyono Center for Science and Accelerator Technology – BATAN
  • A. Budianto Polytechnic Institute of Nuclear Technology – BATAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2019.21.2.5449

Keywords:

experimental power reactor, development, RELAP5, Steady-state

Abstract

Pebble bed reactor design, classified as the high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR), is currently being part of BATAN main program to promote nuclear energy by starting the Experimental Power Reactor (EPR) program since 2015. Starting from 2018, the detail design document has to be submitted into nuclear regulatory body for further assessment. Therefore results of design analysis have to be supplemented by performing a design evaluation, which can be achieved by developing the model of the EPR. The development is performed using RELAP5/SCDAP/Mod.3.4 as the thermal-hydraulic analysis code validated for the light-water reactor having module for the pebble fuel element and non-condensable helium gas. Methodology of model development consists of defining the helium flow path inside the reactor pressure vessel, modelling of pebble bed core including its power distribution, and modelling of reflector components to be simulated under 100 % core power. The developed EPR model results in design parameters, which confirm the main thermal data of the EPR, including the pebble and reflector temperatures. The peak pebble temperature is calculated to be 1,375 °C, which requires further investigations in the model accuracy, since the reference values are around 1,015 °C, even it is below the pebble temperature limit. For safety analysis, the EPR model can be used under nominal core flow condition, which produces more conservative results by paying attention on the RELAP5 specific modules for the pebble bed-gas cooled system.

References

Kadak A.C. The status of the US high-temperature gas reactors. Eng. 2016. 2: 119 - 123.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.026

Zhou X.W., Tang Y. P., Lu Z. M., Zhang J., and Liu B. Nuclear graphite for high temperature gas-cooled reactors. Carbon. 2017. 124: 725 - 727.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.059

Kadak A.C. A future for nuclear energy: pebble bed reactors. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 2005. 1

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2005.006679

Setiadipura T., Bakhri S., Sunaryo G. R., and Wisnubroto D. S. Cooling passive safety features of reaktor daya Eksperimental. In: International Conference on Thermal Science and Technology (ICTST) 2017, AIP Conf. Proc. 1984, 020034-1-020034-9; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046618, Published by AIP Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046618

Zhang Z., Dong Y., Li F., Zhang Z., Wang H., Huang X., Li H., Liu B., Wu X., Wang H., Diao X., Zhang H., and Wang J. The Shandong Shidao Bay 200 MWe high-temperature gas-cooled reactor pebble-bed module (HTR-PM) demonstration power plant: an engineering and technological innovation. Eng. 2016. 2: 112 - 118.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.020

Scari M. E., Costa A. L, Pereira C., Velasquez C. E., and Veloso M. A. F. HTR steady state and transient thermal analyses. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. 41: 7192 - 7196.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.157

Lee W. J., Jeong J. J., Lee S. W., and Chang J. Development of MARS-GCR/V1 for thermal-hydraulic safety analysis of gas cooled reactor systems. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2005. 37: 587 - 594

International Atomic Energy Agency. Evaluation of high temperature gas cooled reactor performance: benchmark analysis related to the PBMR-400, PBMM, GT-MHR, HTR-10 and the ASTRA critical facility. IAEA-TECDOC-1694. Vienna. 2013

Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional. Preparation of preliminary engineering design document for Experimental Power Reactor (RDE) - Optional Report Conceptual Design Reactor Core, Document No. RDE/DS-WBS02-201-004, 12 December 2015.

Allison C.M. and Hohorst J. K. Project report: role of RELAP/SCDAPSIM in nuclear safety. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins. 2010. Article ID 425658. doi:10.1155/2010/425658.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/425658

Ekariansyah A.S. and Widodo S. Benchmarking of experimental setup for pressure drop calculation in a packed pebble bed using RELAP5. In: Symposium of Emerging Nuclear Technology and Engineering Novelty (SENTEN 2018), Palembang. 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1198/2/022033

Abdulmohsin R. S. and Al Dahhan M. H. Pressure drop and fluid flow characteristics in a packed pebble bed reactor. Nucl. Technol. 2017. 00: 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1292818

Seeger O., Laurie M., El Abjani A., Ejton J., Boudaud D., Freis D., Carbol P., Rondinella V.V., Futterer M., and Allelein H. J. KuFA safety testing of HTR fuel pebbles irradiated in the high flux reactor in Petten, Nucl. Eng. Des. 2015. 306: 59-68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.11.033

Akaho E. H. K. and Asamoah M. Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer model for the pebble bed high temperature gas cooled reactor. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Tech. 2012. 4: 1659 - 1666.

Ekariansyah A.S., Widodo S., Tjahjono H., Susyadi, Wahyono P.I., Budianto A. Preliminary analysis of core temperature distribution of experimental power reactor using RELAP5. Tri Dasa Mega. 2018. 20: 159 - 165.

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2018.20.3.4665

Zhou Y., Wu M., Zhu S., Ma Y., Li F., Shi L., Dong Y. Thermal-hydraulic simulation of the primary loop of the HTR. Nucl. Safety Sim. 2010. 1: 366 - 373.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-02

How to Cite

Ekariansyah, A., Subekti, M., Widodo, S., Tjahjono, H., Susyadi, Wahyono, P., & Budianto, A. (2019). Development of Experimental Power Reactor (EPR) Model For Safety Analysis Using RELAP5. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 21(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2019.21.2.5449