VERIFICATION TO THE RSG-GAS FUEL DISCHARGE BURN-UP USING SRAC2006 MODULE OF COREBN/HIST

Authors

  • J. Susilo Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety, BATAN
  • T.M. Sembiring Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety, BATAN
  • M. Imron Center for Multipurpose Reactor G.A. Siwabessy, BATAN
  • G.R. Sunaryo Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety, BATAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2018.20.1.4041

Keywords:

Discharge Burn-Up, RSG-GAS, COREBN/HIST, BATAN-FUEL

Abstract

For 30 years operation, some of the modifications to the RSG GAS core has been done, that are changes included the type of fuel from U3O8-Al to U3Si2-Al with the same density 2.96 gU/cc, the loading pattern of standard fuel elements/fuel control elements from 6/1 & 6/2 to 5/1 pattern, and in core fuel management calculation tool has been change from IAFUEL to BATANFUEL. To obtain an extension of the operating license for the next 10 years, the RSG-GAS Periodic Safety Assessment Document is need to prepared. According to the Regulatory Body Chairman Regulation No. 2 2015, RSG-GAS safety assessment should be done independently. As part of this assessment the fuel discharge burn-up must be estimated. In this research, to ensure that the misposition of fuel element in the core has not occurred, the investigation to the document operating report related the fuel placement has been done. Therefore, by using 78th to 93rd operation data, verify of the fuel discharge burn-up of the RSG-GAS has been performed by using SRAC2006 module of COREBN/HIST. In addition, the results of these calculations are also made comparative with the operating report data that is calculated by using BATAN-FUEL. Maximum fuel discharge burn-up (57.73% of U-235) was verified still under permissible value determined by the regulatory body (<60% of U-235). Maximum differences value between two computer codes was about 2.12 % of U-235 (3.80%) that is fuel at the B-7 position. Fuel discharge burn-up of RSG-GAS showed almost the same value for each the operation cycle, range of
1.52% of U-235. So it can be concluded that the RSG-GAS core operation over the last ten years was in good fuel management performance, in accordance with the design. BATAN-FUEL has been comformed well enough with COREBN/HIST.

References

Surbakti T., Purwadi. Reactivity characteristic of RSG-GAS working core for 30 years operation. J. Penelit. Fis. dan Apl. 2017. 7(1):13-26.

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v7n1.p13-26

Díez C.J., Buss O., Hoefer A., Porsch D., Cabellos O. Comparison of nuclear data uncertainty propagation methodologies for PWR burn-up simulations. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2015. 77:101-14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.10.022

Susilo J., Pane J.S. Fuel burn-up distribution and transuranic nuclide contents produced at the first cycle operation of AP1000. Tri Dasa Mega. 2015. 18(2):101-11.

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2016.18.2.2665

Wan C., Cao L., Wu H., Shen W. Nuclear-data uncertainty propagations in burnup calculation for the PWR assembly. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2017. 100:20-31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.037

Cabellos O., Castro E., Ahnert C., Holgado C. Propagation of nuclear data uncertainties for PWR core analysis. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2014. 46(3):299-312.

https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.01.2014.709

Margulis M., Gilad E. Monte Carlo and nodal neutron physics calculations of the IAEA MTR benchmark using Serpent/DYN3D code system. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2016. 88:118-33.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.12.008

Sembiring T.M., Liem P.H. Development and verification of fuel burn-up calculation model in a reduced reactor geometry. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2008. 35(2):167-74.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.07.001

Ginting A.B., Liem P.H. Absolute burnup measurement of LEU silicide fuel plate irradiated in the RSG GAS multipurpose reactor by destructive radiochemical technique. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2015. 85:613-20.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.016

Nampira Y., Ismarwanti S., Sufmawan A., Mustofa K. Utilization of gamma spectrometry for observation of distribution of cleavage in nuclear fuel elements post irradiation. Urania. 2014. 20(2):84-91.

Boybul, Yanlinastuti, Ginting A.B. Analysis of cesium and uranium content inirradiated U3Si2-Al fuel. Urania. 2017. 23(2):107-16.

https://doi.org/10.17146/urania.2017.23.2.3568

Pinem S., Liem P.H., Sembiring T.M., Surbakti T. Fuel element burn-up measurements for the equilibrium LEU silicide RSG GAS (MPR-30) core under a new fuel management strategy. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2016. 98:211-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.08.010

Laporan Operasi Reaktor RSG-GAS Teras 78 - 94, No.Ident:RSG.OR.XX.04.44.12-17. Tangerang Selatan Indonesia : Center for Multipurpose Research Reactor, National Atomic Energy Agency; 2012-2017.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-16

How to Cite

Susilo, J., Sembiring, T. M., Imron, M., & Sunaryo, G. (2018). VERIFICATION TO THE RSG-GAS FUEL DISCHARGE BURN-UP USING SRAC2006 MODULE OF COREBN/HIST. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 20(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2018.20.1.4041