DETERMINATION OF MAINTENANCE PRIORITY INDEX (MPI) FOR COMPONENTS ON RSG-GAS SAFETY SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2018.20.2.4283Keywords:
Maintenance, priority, index, safety system, RSG-GASAbstract
Reliability management is an activity to ensure no failure of all equipment when operated. Reliability management can be optimized to minimize costs or eliminate failures and causes. Critical equipment is the condition of a potentially damaging component affecting the operational reliability of the system. The criticality level of each equipment determines its impact on the operating system and the direction of maintenance improvement. The research was conducted on the main system/component of the operating system and performed at the level of reliability improvement. The purpose of this research is to prioritize the reliability of systems and equipment for safety systems using System & Equipment Reliability Prioritization (SERP). Determination of component criticality level on reliability management based on category rankings of frequency data and duration of interference with certain criteria as well as system aspects, safety, quality and cost. From the evaluation results it can be concluded that the MPI of the RSG-GAS system/ component for the top 5 if sorted are KBE01 AP-01-02, PA01-02 / CR001, KBE02 AA-01/ AA-02, JE-01 (AP01-02 ) and JNA10 / 20/30 BC001 with MPI values 143,101, 95, 90 and 60.
References
International Atomic Energy Agency Ageing Management for Research Reactors. VIENNA: 2010.
Deswandri, Subekti M., Sunaryo G.R. Reliability Analysis of RSG-GAS Primary Cooling System to Support Aging Management Program Reliability Analysis of RSG-GAS Primary Cooling System to Support Aging Management Program. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018. 962:1- 16.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012002
Andriulo S., Arleo M.A., Carlo F. De, Gnoni M.G., Tucci M., Andriulo S., et al. Effectiveness of of maintenance approaches for for High High Reliability Reliability Organizations Organizations Effectiveness of Reliability Organizations Effectiveness Reliability Organizations. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2015. 48(3):466-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.125
Saleh N., Sharawi A.A., Elwahed M.A., Petti A., Puppato D., Balestra G. Preventive Maintenance Prioritization Index of Medical Equipment Using Quality Function Deployment. 2015. 19(3):1029-35.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2337895
Heo J., Kim M., Kim D., Lyu J., Kang Y., Park J. Maintenance Priority Index of Overhead Transmission Lines for Reliability Centered Approach. 2014. 9(3)
https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2014.9.4.1248
Tang Y., Liu Q., Jing J., Yang Y., Zou Z. A framework for identi fi cation of maintenance signi fi cant items in reliability centered maintenance. 2017. 118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.011
Keizer M.C.A.O., Teunter R.H., Veldman J. Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components. 2017. 257:209-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.047
Economics I.J.P., Mabrouk A. Ben, Chelbi A., Radhoui M. Optimal imperfect maintenance strategy for leased equipment. Intern. J. Prod. Econ. 2016. 178:57-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.024
Florian M., Dalsgaard J. Planning of operation & maintenance using risk and reliability based methods.Elsevier B.V.; 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.440
Dao C.D., Zuo M.J. Selective maintenance of multi-state systems with structural dependence. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2017. 159(October 2015):184-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.013
Verbert K., Schutter B. De, Babu R. Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems. 2017. 159(August 2016):310-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.032
Hartini E. Implementation of Missing Values Handling Method for Evaluating the System/Component Maintenance Historical Data. 2017. 19(1):11-8.
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2017.19.1.3159
Hameed Z., Wang K. Clustering Analysis to Improve the Reliability and Maintainability of Wind Turbines with Self-Organizing Map Neural Network. 2013. 9(3):245-60
