PRELIMINARY STUDY ON RELAP5 SIMULATION OF DVI LINE BREAK ACCIDENT IN THE ATLAS FACILITY USING BEST ESTIMATE PLUS UNCERTAINTY METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2017.19.1.3200Keywords:
best estimate plus uncertainty, DVI line break, ATLAS facility, RELAP5, simulationAbstract
The Best Estimate plus Uncertainty (BEPU) is a methodology, which was introduced in the deterministic safety analysis to evaluate limitations of codes in simulating realistic plant behavior by providing quantified uncertainty bands of calculation results. It has been already widely accepted in licensing nuclear power plant by regulatory bodies of United States (USNRC), Argentina, and Canada. The uncertainty evaluation in the BEPU method is performed by different approaches such as GRS, IRSN, ENUSA, AEAT, and UNIPI. Due to the complexity of other approaches, the purpose of this study is to present some key aspects of the BEPU process using the GRS methodology by selecting the ATLAS test facility to simulate 50% break of DVI line since any safety analysis performed so far was using deterministic best estimate approach only. As comparison of the best estimate simulation performed by RELAP5/SCDAP/Mod3.4, experimental data related to the event was used. After 100 simulations, the uncertainty bands of peak heater of clad temperature and primary pressure transient obtained were only in a close agreement with the experimental data in the earlier period and less than 250 seconds during the transient condition. Therefore the overall accuracy of the best estimate simulation plays a key role on the final results of the uncertainty analysis because the propagation of any discrepancy in the best estimate with the experimental data will occur throughout the simulation. After that, selecting the important parameters to be randomly generated needs to be performed carefully by studying the important phenomena related to the event analyzed and associated plant model.
References
IAEA Best Estimate Safety Analysis For Nuclear Power Plants: Uncertainty Evaluation. Safety Reports Series No. 52. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008.
IAEA Safety Margins of Operating Reactors: Analysis of uncertainties and implications for Decision Making. IAEA-TECDOC-1332. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2003.
Reocreux M. Safety analysis and best estimate codes. in: the 4th Regional Meeting of Nuclear Energy in Central Europe, Bled, Slovenia. 1997.
Wilson GE. Historical insights in the development of best estimate plus uncertainty safety analysis. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2013; 52: 2 - 9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.03.002
D'Auria F., Mazzantini O. The best estimate plus uncertainty challenge in the current licensing process of present reactors. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins. 2011; ID 958218. doi: 10.1155/2011/958218.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/958218
D'Auria F., Camargo C., Mazzantini O. The best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) approach in licensing of current nuclear reactors. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2012; 248: 317 - 328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.04.002
Blake L., Gavrus G., Vecchiarelli J. Best estimate plus uncertainty analysis of LBLOCA for a pickering B CANDU reactor. in: ASME 2010 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, Quebec, Canada. 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM-ICNMM2010-31018
Reventos F. Major results of the OECD BEMUSE (best estimate methods, uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation) programme. in: The Seminar on The Transfer of Competence, Knowledge and Experience Gained Through CSNI Activities in The Field of Thermal Hydraulics (THICKET), Pisa, Italy. 2008.
De Crecy A., Bazin P., Glaeser H., Skorek T., Joucla J., Probst P et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the LOFT L2-5 test: results of the BEMUSE programme. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2008; 238: 3561 - 3578.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.06.004
Perez M., Reventos F., Batet L., Guba A., Toth I., Mieusset T et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a LBLOCA in a PWR nuclear power plant: results of the phase V of the BEMUSE programme. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2011; 241: 4206 - 4222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.019
Munoz-Cobo JL., Escriva A., Mendizabal R., Pelayo F., Melara J. CSAU methodology and results for an ATWS event in a BWR using Information Theory Methods. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2014; 278: 445 - 464.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.036
Glaeser H. GRS method for uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation of code results and applications. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins. 2008; ID 798901. doi:10.1155/2008/798901.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/798901
D'Auria F., Giannotti W. Development of code with capability of internal assessment of uncertainty. Journal Nucl. Tech. 2000; 131 (1): 159 - 196.
https://doi.org/10.13182/NT00-5
Glaeser H. Results from the application of uncertainty methods in the CSNI uncertainty methods study (UMS). in: The Seminar on The Transfer of Competence, Knowledge and Experience Gained Through CSNI Activities in The Field of Thermal-Hydraulics (THICKET), Pisa, Italy. 2008.
Freixa J., Kim TW., Manera A. Thermal-hydraulic analysis of an intermediate LOCA test at the ROSA facility including uncertainty evaluation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2012; 249: 97 - 103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.061
Ekariansyah AS., Widodo S. Performance analysis of AP1000 passive systems during Direct Vessel Injection (DVI) line break. Atom Indonesia. 2016; 42: 79 - 88.
https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2016.511
Widodo S., Ekariansyah AS. AP1000 partial and complete loss of flow accident analysis using RELAP5. in: Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi Nuklir. Batam. 2016 (in Indonesian).
NEA International Standard Problem No. 50, ATLAS Test, SB-DVI-09:50% (6-inch) Break of DVI line of the APR1400 - Final Integration Report, NEA/CSNI/R(2012)6, Korea: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2012.
Kim YS., Choi KY., Park HS., Cho S., Kim BD., Choi NH., Baek WP. Commissioning of the ATLAS thermal-hydraulic integral test facility. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2008; 35: 1791 - 1799.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2008.05.010
Perez M., Reventos F. Integrated uncertainty analysis using RELAP/SCDAPSIM/Mod4.0. in: the 7th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Operation, and Safety (NUTHOS-7), Seoul. 2008.
Aksan N. International standard problems and small break loss of coolant accident (SBLOCA). Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins. 2008; ID 814572. doi: 10.1155/2008/814572.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/814572
Lee SW., Chung BD., Bang YS., Bae SW.. Analysis of uncertainty quantification method by comparing Monte-Carlo method and Wilk's formula. Nucl. Eng. Tech. 2014; 46. doi: 10.5516/NET.02.2013.047.
https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.02.2013.047
Ekariansyah AS., Widodo S., Tjahjono H. Modelling on the ATLAS test facility for best-estimate simulation of loss of coolant accident. in: Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi Nuklir, Batam. 2016 (in Indonesian).
Veronese F., Kozlowsk T. TRACE V5 code applicatio DVI line break LOCA using ATLAS facility. Nucl. Eng. Tech. 2012; 44: 719 - 726.
https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.02.2012.713
Griffith MJ., Schlegel JP., Hibiki T., Ishii M., Kinoshita I., Yoshida Y. Phenomena identification and ranking table for thermal-hydraulic phenomena during small-break LOCA with loss of high pressure injection. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 2014; 73: 51 - 63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.008
Freixa J., Kim TW., Manera A. Post-test thermal-hydraulic analysis of two intermediate LOCA tests at the ROSA facility including uncertainty evaluation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2013; 264: 153 - 160