FRACTURE MECHANICS UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN THE RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL: (2D) SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2016.18.2.2466Keywords:
Uncertainty analysis, fracture mechanics, LHS, FEM, reactor pressure vesselsAbstract
The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is a pressure boundary in the PWR type reactor which serves to confine radioactive material during chain reaction process. The integrity of the RPV must be guaranteed either in a normal operation or accident conditions. In analyzing the integrity of RPV, especially related to the crack behavior which can introduce break to the reactor pressure vessel, a fracture mechanic approach should be taken for this assessment. The uncertainty of input used in the assessment, such as mechanical properties and physical environment, becomes a reason that the assessment is not sufficient if it is perfomed only by deterministic approach. Therefore, the uncertainty approach should be applied. The aim of this study is to analize the uncertainty of fracture mechanics calculations in evaluating the reliability of PWR`s reactor pressure vessel. Random character of input quantity was generated using probabilistic principles and theories. Fracture mechanics analysis is solved by Finite Element Method (FEM) with MSC MARC software, while uncertainty input analysis is done based on probability density function with Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) using python script. The output of MSC MARC is a J-integral value, which is converted into stress intensity factor for evaluating the reliability of RPV’s 2D. From the result of the calculation, it can be concluded that the SIF from probabilistic method, reached the limit value of fracture toughness earlier than SIF from deterministic method. The SIF generated by the probabilistic method is 105.240 MPa m0.5. Meanwhile, the SIF generated by deterministic method is 100.876 MPa m0.5.
References
Bo-Yi Chen, Chin-Cheng Huang, Hsoung-Wei Chou, Hsien-Chou Lin, Ru-Feng Liu, Tung-Li Weng, Han-Jou Chang, Reactor pressure vessel integrity assessment by probabilistic fracture mechanics a plant specific analysis, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2014; 117:64-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.10.011
Jose Martinez Trinidad , Didier Samayoa Ochoa, Erika Hermandez Garcia, Jose de Jesus Silva Lomeli, Orlando Susarrey, Huerta and alexander Balankin, Probabilistic fracture mechanics: Aplication in Reactor Pressure Vessel and Oil Pipelines, instituto politecnico Nacional, Revista Mexicana De Fisica 51 2005; p.19-29.
Shuxiao Li, Hailong Zhang, Shilei Li, Yanli Wang, Fei Xue, Xitao Wang, Probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis of thermally aged nuclear piping in a pressurized water reactor, Nuclear Engineering and Design 2013; 265:611- 618.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.06.034
Hans-Werner Viehrig , Eberhard Altstadt, Mario Houska , Matti Valo , Fracture mechanics characterisation of the beltline welding seam of the decommissioned WWER 440 reactor pressure vessel of nuclear power plant Greifswald Unit 4, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2012; 89:126-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.10.016
Kunio Onizawa, Hiroyuki Nishikawa, Hiroto Itoh, Development of probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis codes for reactor pressure vessels and piping considering welding residual stress, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2010; 87:2-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.11.011
Shankar Sankararaman, You Ling, Sankaran Mahadevan, Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, United States, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2011; 78:1487-1504.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017
T.L.Anderson , "Fracture Mechanics Fundamental in Aplication", Taylor and Francis Boca Raton, New York, 2005.
F. González-Albuixech, G. Qian, M. Niffenegger, "Integrity analysis of reactor pressure vessels subjected to pressurizedthermal shocks by XFEMV", Nuclear Engineering and Design 2014; 275:336-343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.038
Shankar Sankararaman, You Ling, Sankaran Mahadevan Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2011; 78:1487-1504.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017
Shankar Sankararaman, You Ling, Sankaran Mahadevan, Dusko Kancev, Gasper Zerovnik, Marko Cepin, Uncertainty analysis in the nuclear industry: Analytical unavailability modelling incorporating ageing of safety components, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012; 25:643-649.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.01.009
Miroslav Vorechovsky, "Hierarchical Refinement of Latin Hypercube Samples", Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2014; 29:1-18.
MSC Software "User's Guide Marc 2012", USA, 2012.
A.Gopichand, Y.Srinivas, A.V.N.L. Sharma, Computation Of Stress Intensity Factor Of Brass Plate With Edge Crack Using J- Integral Technique, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 2012; 01:261-266.
https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2012.0103011
Entin Hartini, Roziq Himawan, Uncertainty Analysis Software Development On The Structure Calculation of Materials (in Indonesia), Proceedings of the National Seminar of MIPA 2014, p.356-360.
S. Marie, Y. Menager and S. Chapuliot, Stress intensity factors for underclad and through clad defects in a reactor pressure vessel submitted to a pressurized thermal shock, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 205; 82:746-760.