FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN RELIABILITY OF HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTOR OPERATION

Authors

  • Sigit Santoso Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety (PTKRN) – BATAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2016.18.3.3017

Keywords:

PSF, HTGR, human operator, control room, human reliability

Abstract

Operator roles and intervene actions on the operation of gas cooled reactor would be different compared to their roles in other reactor types. Analysis of operator performance and the influencing factors can be conducted comprehensively in Human Reliability Analysis (HRA). Using HRA, the impact of human errors on the system and the ways to reduce human error impact and frequency can be idenfified. The paper discusses factors influencing reactor operator performance to response to the cooling accident of the high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR). Analysis and qualification of influencing factors, which are performance shaping factors (PSF), were conducted based on time reliability curve and Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Based on time reliability curve, results showed that time variable contributes to the improvement of operator performance (PSF<1), especially when the safety features of the system properly work as in the design. Based on CREAM, it can be identified that in addition to the time variable, human machine interface design and sufficiently training also contribute to the improvement of operator performance. This study found that total PSF equals to 0.25, in which the positive dominant factor is time variable whose PSF is 0.01 and the negative dominant factors are procedure and working cycle whose PSF is 5. Those PSF values reflected the multiplier factors to the human error probability. The analysis of performance shaping factors should be developed on the other operation and accident scenarios of HTGRs prior to be further applied for a comprehensive assessment and analysis of human reliability and for the design of human machine interface system at control room.

 

References

Kim S. K., Byun S. N. Effects of Crew Resource Management Training on the Team Performance of Operators in an Advanced Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 2012; 48(9):1256-1264,

https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.9711814

Wu Ji-Tsung Ben, and Marakas, George M. The Impact of Operational User Participation on Perceived System Implementation Success: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2006; 46(5):127-40.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2006.11645930

Leva M. C., Pirani R., De Michela M., Clancy P. Human Factors Issues and the Risk of High Voltage Equipment. Journal Chemical Engineering Transactions 2012; 26:273-278.

Swain A.D., Guttmann H.E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/CR-1278. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C., America, 1983.

https://doi.org/10.2172/5752058

Demichela M., Pirani R., Leva M.C. Human Factor Analysis Embedded in Risk Assessment of Industrial Machines: Effects on the Safety Integrity Level. International Journal of Performability Engineering 2014; 10(5):487-496.

Pin-Chao Liao, Xintong Luo, Tao Wang, Yusong Su. The Mechanism of how Design Failures cause Unsafe Behavior: The Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Procedia Engineering 2016; 145:715-722

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.088

Zhiqiang Sun., Hongwei, X., Xujian, S., Fenggiang. Engineering Approach for Human Error Probability Quantification. Journal of System Engineering and Electronics 2009; 20(5):1144-1152.

Chang, Y.H.J., and Mosleh, A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilisitic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents, Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2007; 29:1014- 1040.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.010

Kim MC., Seong PH., Hollnagel, E. A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006; 91(2):191-199.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.12.003

Braseth A.O., Nihlwing C., Svengren, H., et al,. Lessons learned from Halden project research on human system interfaces. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 2009; 41(3):215-224.

https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.3.215

Kim MC., Seong PH. An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006; 91:270-82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.012

Monferini A., Konstandinidou M., Nivolianitou Z., Weber S., Kontogiannis T., Kafka P., Kay A.M, Leva M.C., Demichela M. A Compound Methodology to Assess the Impact of Human and Organizational Factors Impact on the Risk Level of Hazardous Industrial Plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2013; 119:280-289.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.04.012

Lee SW., Kim AR., Ha JS., and Seong, PH. Development of a qualitative evaluation framework for performance shaping factors in advanced MCR HRA, Annals of Nuclear Energy 2011, 38(8):1751-1759.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.006

Gertman D., Blackman H., Marble J., Byers J., Haney L., and Smith C. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method, NUREG/CR-6883, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005, Washington, DC.

Seung Jun Lee, Jaewhan Kim, Seung-Cheol Jang, Yeong Cheol Shin. Modeling of a Dependence between Human Operators in Advanced Main Control Rooms, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 2009; 46(5):424-435.

https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711549

IAEA, Status Report 70 - Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR), International Atomic Energy Agency, 2010.

Ball S.J. Overview of Modular HTGR Safety Characterization and Postulated Accident Behavior Licensing Strategy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, May 2014

https://doi.org/10.2172/1136375

O'Hara J.M., Higgins J.C., and Brown, W.S. Nuclear Engineering Technology Journal. 2009; 41:225-236.

https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.3.225

Lee HC., Seong, PH. Acomputational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009; 94(11):796-805.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.012

Zhou K., Zhou Y., Ma Y., et al. Simulation of Thermal-Hydraulic Process in Reactor of HTR-PM Based on Flow and Heat Transfer Network. Atomic Energy Science and Technology Journal 2012; 46:918-926.

Konstandinidou M., Nivolianitou Z., Kiranoudis C., Markatos N. A Fuzzy Modeling Application of CREAM Methodology for Human Reliability Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006; 91(6):706-716.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.002

Takemoto T., Mitomo N., Hikida K., and Yoshimura K. A Study on Human Factors Analysis for Possible Factors of Marine Accident-Modifying CPC for Marine Accident Analysis, The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 2012; 127:95-101.

https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.127.95

Downloads

Published

2016-10-03

How to Cite

Santoso, S. (2016). FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN RELIABILITY OF HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTOR OPERATION. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 18(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2016.18.3.3017