PENENTUAN KOEFISIEN DISPERSI ATMOSFERIK UNTUK ANALISIS KECELAKAAN REAKTOR PWR DI INDONESIA
Keywords:
dispersion coefficient, atmospheric, PWR, accident, IndonesiaAbstract
The atmosphere is an important pathway in the migration of radionuclides transport from the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) to the environment and humans. The dose accepted in the environment and humans is influenced by the sourceterm and NPP siting condition. Distribution of radionuclides in the atmosphere is determined by the dispersion coefficient. To find the environment dose acceptance for nuclear power plants in Indonesia, it is necessary to map the dispersion coefficient for Indonesia potential siting Model calculations in this study using Segmented plume model, which a model that is applied to the ATMOS and CONCERN module of PC-Cosyma software. The calculation has done for PWR 1000 MWe with UO2 fuel, DBA accident postulations, roughnes site conditions, for 8 example site such as Muria Peninsula, Coastal Banten, and the C, D, E, and F stability. Dispersion coefficient was calculated for the 8 fission product groups are: the noble gases, lanthanides, noble metals, halogens, alkali metals, tellurium, cerium, and strontium & barium groups. Input calculation using the program package Origen-2 and Arc View for the preparation of input calculations. The results of the dispersion parameter calculated are: the average maximum is obtained at a distance of 800 m radius from the source, for noble metals, alkali metal and cerium group nuclides. Dispersion parameters for maximum at Muria site is 1.53E-04 s/m3, Serang site is 1.40E-03 s/m3, site with stability C is 1.72E-04 s/m3, stability D is 1.40E-04 s/m3, stability E is 1.07E-04 s/m3, and site with the stability F is 2.14E-05 s/m3.
References
Westinghouse. AP 1000-European Design control document. rev.0. Chap. 15. 2009.
Lagzi I. et. all. Simulation of the dispersion of nuclear contamination using an adaptive Eulerian grid model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2004;75: 59–82,
Joong M.Y, Glaser R. Atmospheric dispersion analysis using MACCS2 February 3, 2004, International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP '04). Pittsburgh. PA; 2004; June 13- 17, United States; 2004
Raza S, Avila R, and Cervantes J. A. 3-D Lagrangian (Monte Carlo) method For the direct plume gamma dose rate calculations. J. of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2002; 38: 254 – 60
EC-European Commission. Determination of the in-containment source term for a large - break loss of coolant accident. EUR 19841 EN; 2001
European Commission. PC COSYMA version 2.0. User Guide, National Radiological Protection Board. Forschungzentrum Karlsruhe GmbH; 1995
Jilani A. B. Atmospheric dispersion and consequence modeling of radiological emergencies. Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan. October; 2009
Mahura A, Baklanov A, Rensen S. J.H,. Long-term atmospheric transport and deposition patterns from nuclear risk sites in euro-arctic region. Danish Meteorological Institute. Sci. Report, N; 2002; 2-15
Basit A. Dispersion of radionuclides released into a stable planetary boundary layer using a Monte Carlo model. Jounal of Radiological Protection. 2008; 26; 375- 87.
Raza S, Avila, RA. Comparison of direct gamma dose rates from a stationary Gaussian plume using different models. Nuclear Technology. 2002; 138; 21 – 26
Baklanov A, Mahura A, Rensen S. J.H. Methodology for prediction and estimation of consequences of possible atmospheric releases of hazardousmatter: Kursk Submarine Study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.2003;3: 1-42.
Yao R. Atmospheric dispersion of radioactive material in radiological risk assessment and emergency response. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology. 2011; 1; 7-13
Sportisse B, Review A review of parameterizations for modelling dry deposition and scavenging of radionuclides, Research Center in Atmospheric Environment (CEREA). 77455 Champs sur Marne. France. Journal Atmospheric Environment. 2000; 41; 2683–98
Baxter M.S. Radioactivity in the environment. Jornal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2007; 10; 10-23
Hao H. Comparison of atmospheric dispersion factor in complex terrain. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology. 2011; 1;452-5
