SELECTION OF CROSSING FACILITIES BASED ON CRITICAL GAP (CASE STUDY DHARMAWANGSA STREET, SURABAYA)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pedestrians have a high risk to be hit by motor vehicle when they crossed the street, thus the choose of appropriate cross facilities are very important. An alternative for choosing cross facilities are by using the Critical Gap method. This method is used to measure the possibility of crossing the street safely. This study was started by gathering primary data for 4 hours at the traffic peak hours. From the calculation, the case of Dharmawangsa Street, Surabaya, showed that the critical gap is about 3,55 seconds. The observation from 07.00-11.00 a.m. showed that the possibilities of crossing the road respectively are: 45, 55, 56, and 60. Compared to the number pedestrians crossing the road, the research showed about 71, 24, 33, and 49 peoples. In this case, the possibility ofcrossing the street at 07.00-08.00 a.m. cannot be fulfilled. Meanwhile, the possibility to cross the street with safelyat 08.00-11.00 a.m. can be fulfilled. Therefore, the use of midblock crosses is still relevant.
Article Details
References
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 2009, Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan, Jakarta.
Federal Highway Administration. 2002. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide —Providing Safety and Mobility. Georgetown.
AASHTO, 2004. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum. 1995. Tata Cara Perencanaan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perkotaan. NO.: 011/T/Bt/1995. Jakarta
Agah, Heddy R. 2009. Evaluation of Pedestrian Characteristics for Different Type of Facilities and its Uses; Case study in the area of Jakarta Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia
Brilon W., Koeniga R., Troutbeck R.J., 1999. Useful estimation procedures for Gap Kritiss. Transportation Research Part A 33:161-186.
TCRP and NCHRP, 2006. Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Transportation Research Board; Washington.
(http://kelanakota.suarasurabaya.net/?id=10d703aab3390ca6ce8d7c8444833a67201074147 diakses 22 November 2011).
Nicholas J.G. dan Lester A.H., 2002. Traffic and Highway Engineering. Toronto: University of Virginia.