Pelibatan Koperasi dalam Program KUR

Sebuah Inovasi Kebijakan Ekonomi dengan Peluang dan Tantangannya

Authors

  • Latif Adam Peneliti Pusat Penelitian Ekonomi, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.26.1.2018.21-46

Keywords:

KUR, Inovation, Cooperative criteria, SMEs, productive sector

Abstract

                                                                              This paper analyzes the opportunities and challenges for cooperatives (KSP) to participate in KUR program. By using descriptive analysis, it was found that cooperatives can play a significant role in improving the outreach of KUR on the basis of proportional sectoral and geographical distribution. However, this paper also emphasizes that efforts to invole cooperatives in the program should be implemented carefully. KUR is a banking product in which its implementation must be in line with microprudentials regulatios. Cooperatives need an adaptation period to comply with KUR’s rules and regulations. Main policy challenges that need to be addressed is to simplify complex subsidy payment mechanism. The government needs also to develop selection criterias to appoint competent cooperatives to engage in the KUR program. It is recommended that participating cooperatives should meet the following criterias: First, having strong assets and capital structures. Second, having experience in managing productive microcredit loans. Third, promoting productive microcredit professional human resources. Fourth, developing IT (Information Technology) infrastructure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, L. (2009). The Economic Role of Inter-Firm Networks in the Development of SMEs, Study of Symbiosis in the Indonesian Garment Industry. Lambert Academic Publishing.

Adam, L. (2010). The Role of SMEs in the Indonesia Industrialization. Economic and Finance in Indonesia, 45 (1), 15–-30.

Adam, L. (2017). Evolusi Program Kredit Mikro. Dalam Nugroho, A. (ed.). Komersialisasi Kredit Usaha Rakyat untuk Pemberdayaan UMKM di Indonesia. LIPI Press, 20-35.

Adam, L. dan Lestari, E. (2017). Indonesia’s Guaranteed Microfinance Program (KUR): Lesson from the First Stage of Implementation. Journal of Southeast Asian Economiest. 34 (2), 322-344.

Assa, J.B., H. Tampajara, S. Endi. (2017). Segala Permulaan itu Sulit. Pohon Cahaya. Jogyakarta

Djunaid, H.A.Z.A. dan Djunaid, H.A. (2002). Berpikir Besar dalam Koperasi. Perintis Jasa. Jakarta

Gustifa, R. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kredit Macet pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam di Kota Padang. Manajemen. 1 (1). Pp. : 1-21

Noordiansyah, A. (2010). Analisis Kredit Bermasalah pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam (KSP) Harapan Mulya Kudus. Undergraduate Thesis. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang

P2E LIPI. (2012). KUR di Era Otonomi Daerah: Membangun Sinergi antara Kelembagaan Pasar, Pemerintah Daerah dan Komunitas dalam Pengelolaan Kredit Program untuk Pemberdayaan UMKM. Jakarta: P2E-LIPI

Sarwoko, E. (2009). Analisis Peranan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam/Unit Simpan Pinjam dalam Pengembangan UMKM di Kabupaten Malang. Modernisasi. 5 (3), 172-188.

TNP2K. (2014). An Analysis on the Impact of the Increasing Number of Participating Banks that Provide the KUR Mikro Loans. T

NP2K. (2015a). Program Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) sebagai Alat Pendorong Pengembangan UMKM di Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Latif Adam. (2025). Pelibatan Koperasi dalam Program KUR: Sebuah Inovasi Kebijakan Ekonomi dengan Peluang dan Tantangannya. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 26(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.26.1.2018.21-46