TATA KELOLA DAN PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING EKONOMI
SUATU PENULUSURAN KONSEP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.25.2.2017.33-46Keywords:
governance, competitiveness, proper governance, inclusive and cooperativeAbstract
This paper aimed to develop a conceptual framework that connect between governance and competitiveness. Governance needs to exploite and develop, supreme charactheristics of economic community within government, business sector, and society in the context of global, central and local government. We defined this framework as proper governance. Proper governance in the context of competitiveness aims to promote inclusiveness and cooperative. Proper governance is optimal combinations among elements of proper governance such as developmentalist, democratic, socially inclusve, and local content; and the elements of competitiveness such as trust and confidence, gradual, balance, and specific, and cooperative and collaborative. Thus, proper governance in the context of competitivenss needs to develop inclusive development within the spirit of cooperative or gotong royong.Downloads
References
A’Gh, A. (2001). Public Sector Reforms, Institutional Design and Strategy for Good Governance in East Central Europe. Studies in East European Thought, 53 (3), 233-255.
Alence, R. (2004). Political Institutions and Developmental Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42 (2), 163-187.
Apaza, Carmen R. (2009). Measuring Governance and Corruption through the Worldwide Governance Indicators: Critiques, Responses, and Ongoing Scholarly Discussion. Political Science & Politics 42 (01), 139.
Ansell, C., dan Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 18 (4), 543-571.
Brown, T.L., dan Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 13 (4), 441-468.
Chaudhuri, S. dan Ray, S. (1997). The Competitiveness Conundrum: Literature Review and Reflections. Economic and Political Weekly, 32 (48), M83-M91.
Csath, M. (2007). The Competitiveness of Economies: Different Views and Arguments. Society and Economy, 29 (1), 87-102.
Giap, Tan Khee. (2004). The IPS-NTU ASEAN 9 +1 Economic Competitiveness Ranking Indices. Asean Economic Bulletin, 21(2), 234–38.
Griffiths, Andrew dan Raymond F Zammuto. (2005). Insitutional Governance System and Variation in National Competitiveness Advantage: An Integrative Framework. The Academy of Management Review, 30 (4), 823–42.
Grindle, M. (2007). Good Enough Governance. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 553–74.
Kang, D.C. (2003). Transaction Costs and Crony Capitalism in East Asia. Comparative Politics, 35 (4), 439-458.
Kim, Pan Suk. (2010). Building Trust by Improving Governance: Searching for a Feasible Way for Developing Countries. Public Administration Quarterly, 34 (3), 271-299.
Kruger, A. O. (1990). Government Failures in Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4 (3), 9-23.
Mamoon, D. dan Murshed, S.M. (2006). Trade Policy, Openness, Institutions. The Pakistan Development Review, 45 (1), 99-119.
Nanda, V. P. (2006). The ‘Good Governance’ Concept Revisited. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603 (1), 269–83.
North, D. (1994). Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 84 (3).
Olson, M., Sarna, N., dan Swamy, A.N. (2000). Governance and growth: a simple hypothesis explaining cross-country differences in productivity growth. Public Choice, 102, 341-364.
Rodrik, D., Grossman, G., dan Norman, V. (1995). How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich. Economic Policy, 10 (20), 53-107.
Siddiquee, N.A. dan Mohamed, M.Z. (2007). Paradox of Public Sector Reforms in Malaysia: A Good Governance Perspective. Public Administration Quarterly, 31 (3/4), 284-312.
Traxler, F., dan Unger, B. (1994). Governance, Economic Restructuring, and International Competitiveness. Journal of Economic Issues, 28 (1), 1-23.
Weymouth, S. dan Feinberg, R. (2011). National Competitiveness in Comparative Perspective: Evidence from Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53 (3), 141-159.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. Diambil dari http:/www.weforum [diaskses 15 September 2017)
Yusuf, M. (2015). Metode Penelitia: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
