VARIASI PENGARUH PROGRAM BERAS MISKIN (RASKIN) TERHADAP KONSUMSI MAKANAN RUMAH TANGGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.27.2.2019.1-10Keywords:
Consumption, Raskin, IFLSAbstract
Rice for poor households (Raskin) is one of poverty alleviation programs in Indonesia that lasted 21 years, but its influence on household consumption is still causing debate. This study aims to examine the variations in the influence of the Raskin program on food consumption in various household groups based on expenditure using the 2014 Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) data. The estimation model used is multivariate regression using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method. The results showed that in Raskin recipient households, the poorest groups (the lowest 20%) allocated more resources to consume rice and staple food than the less poor groups (the top 20%). Meanwhile, groups of less poor households relatively spend more on nutritious foods, such as eggs and milk, meat and fish. However, the proportion of cigarette and alcohol consumption is also higher in less poor households. The findings of this study encourage the need to improve the target of the Raskin program because the benefits are more enjoyed by less poor households than the poorest households.Downloads
References
Arias, D. and Carneus, M. (2011) ‘Unin-tended Consequences of Food Subsidies: The Case of the Haiti Rice Subsidy’, LCSSD Occasional Paper Series on Food Prices.
Banerjee, A. et al. (2018) ‘Tangible Information and Citizen Empowerment: Identification Cards and Food Subsidy Programs in Indonesia’, Journal of Political Economy, 126(2)
Djamaluddin, S. (2015) How to Ease the Burden of Poor Household ? : The Role of Raskin Program.
Fernandes, M. J. G., Rosengard, J. and Hanna, R. (2015) Improving Food Access for Poor Households in Indonesia: Cash Transfer and the Raskin Program Reform.
Gupta, P. and Huang, B. (2018) In-Kind Transfer and Child Development: Evidence from Subsidized Rice Program in Indonesia. Tokyo.
Gupta, R. P.-S., Wit, M. L. de and McKeown, D. (2007) ‘The Impact of poverty on the current and future health status of children’, Paediatr Child Health, 12(8), pp. 667-673.
Hastuti et al. (2008) Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Raskin. Jakarta.
Hastuti and Maxwell, J. (2003) Beras untuk Keluarga Miskin (RASKIN ): Apakah Program Tahun 2002 Berjalan Efektif ? Bukti-bukti dari Bengkulu dan Karawang. Jakarta.
Jensen, R. T. et al. (2011) ‘Do consumer price subsidies really improve nutrition?’, 93(November), pp. 1205-1223.
Kaushal, N. and Muchomba, F. (2013) How Consumer Price Subsidies Affects Nutrition.
Kustianingrum, W. and Terawaki, T. (2018) ‘The Impacts of Rice Price Subsidy on Nutrition Intake of The Poor’, in 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Economy and Development, pp. 205–209.
Pangaribowo, E. H. (2012) ‘The Impact of “ Rice for the Poor ” on Household Consumption’, in the 56th Australian Agricultural & Resources Economics Society Annual Conference.
Rasyid, M. (2012) ‘Efek Disinsentif Program Raskin Dan Pengaruhnya’, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 13.
Sadono, E. D. (2018) ‘Impact Evaluation of Raskin Program using Matching Method: Case of IFLS 5’, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 11(1), pp. 207–223.
Satriawan, E. and Shrestha, R. (2018) ‘Mistargeting and Regressive Take Up of the Indonesian Rice Subsidy Program’, Asian Economic Journal, 32(4), pp. 387–415. doi: 10.1111/asej.12164.
Sumarto, S., Suryahadi, A. and Widyanti, W. (2004) Assessing the Impact of Indonesian Social Safety Net Programs on Household Welfare and. Jakarta.
World Bank (2012) Raskin Subsidized Rice Delivery: Social Assistance Program and Public Expenditure Review 3. Jakarta
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.