STRATEGI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DI INDONESIA MENGGUNAKAN INSPECTION GAME

Authors

  • Felix Wisnu Handoyo Pusat Penelitian Ekonomi, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.22.1.2014.41-52

Keywords:

Corruption in Indonesia, Inspection Game, Corruption Act

Abstract

Corruption has become problem in Indonesia and it is a big agenda in reformation era to eradicate it. The corruption is already rooted and cultured, it is also spread in many sectors. Start from this problem, this research is very important to analysis corruption using inpection game model in Indonesia. This research is based on what is done by Tsebelis (1989) and Rimawan (2007). The inspection game is one of game theory – as analysis tool to learn interaction between two or more agents with rational (Pradiptyo,2007). This study found that changing of sanction in corruption act will change offender reference to corrupt. Finally, the inspection game model will be one of the efective and efficient strategy to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alatas, (1987). Korupsi: Sifat, Sebab, dan Fungsi, Jakarta: LP3ES

Amundsen, Inge. (2000). Corruption: Definitions and Concepts. Chr. Michelsen: Institute Development Studies and Human Rights.

Becker, G.S. (1968). “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy 1-13.

Bianco, William T.,Peter C. Ordeshook, and George Tsebelis.(1990). “Crime and Punishment: Are One-Shot, Two-Person Games Enough?” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 569-586.Diakses dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/1963536pada28/04/2010 pukul 20:35

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, (2001), Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Pradiptyo, Rimawan. (2007). “Does Punishment Matter? A Refinement of the Inspection Game”. Review Law & Economics. Diakses dari http://www.bepress.com/rle/vol3/iss2/art2 pada 23/04/2010 Pukul 19.07.

Pusat Kajian Administrasi Internasional. (2007). Strategi Penanganan Korupsi di Negara-negara Asia Pasifik. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Quah, Jon S. T.(1999). “Corruption in Asian Countries: Can It Be Minimized?” Public Administration Review, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 483-494.Diakses dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/3110297 pada 28/04/2010 pukul 20:43

Rais, Amien. (2007). Selamatkan Indonesia

Rianto, Bibit S. (2009). Koruptor Go To Hell! Mengupas Anatomi Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Hikmah

Sandholtz, Wayne and Mark M. Gray.(2003). “International Integration and National Corruption” International Organization,Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 761-800. Diakses dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/3594846 pada 28/04/2010 pukul 22:42

The World Bank Policy Paper. (2000). Anticorruption in Transition, A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington DC

Tsebelis, G. (1989). “The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 77-91. Diakses dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/1956435 pada 28/04/2010 pukul 21:02.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Felix Wisnu Handoyo. (2025). STRATEGI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DI INDONESIA MENGGUNAKAN INSPECTION GAME. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 22(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.22.1.2014.41-52

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2014): Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.