PENAKSIRAN DAMPAK MERGER DAN AKUISISI TERHADAP EFISIENSI PERBANKAN, ANALISIS SEBELUM DAN SETELAH MERGER DAN AKUISISI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.24.2.2016.85–95Keywords:
Data Envelopment Analysis, Efficiency, Banking, Merger, acquisitionsAbstract
Corporate mergers and acquisitions are generally understood as an attempt to develop the company to better conditions, by uniting the strengths and / or compensating for the weaknesses that exist in one company with the strengths that exist in other companies. This study intends to predict when consolidation conducted by several banks in Indonesia during the period 2002 to. 2013 is able to bring the condition of these banks to a better (efficient) with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. From the prediction result, it is known that the efficiency level of banks that have consolidated is relatively more efficient than before consolidating. From the calculation of the real efficiency of banks after the merger can prove that in general banks become more efficient after the merger and acquisitionDownloads
References
Avkiran, Necmi Kemal. 1999. “The Evidence on Efficiency Gains: The Role of Mergers and the Benefits to the Public.” Journal of Banking & Finance 23 (7): 1–39.
Banker, Rajiv D, Abraham Charnes, and William W Cooper. 1984. “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30 (9): 1078–92.
Bogetoft, Peter, and Lars Otto. 2011. Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R.
Charnes, Abraham, William W Cooper, and Edwardo Rhodes. 1981. “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow through.” Management Science 27 (6): 668–97.
Chen, Xiaogang, Michael Skully, and Kym Brown. 2005. “Banking Efficiency in China : Application of DEA to Pre- and Post-Deregulation Eras : 1993 – 2000.” China Economic Review 16 (3): 229–45.
Drake, Leigh, and Maximilian J B Hall. 2003. “Efficiency in Japanese Banking : An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (5): 891–917.
Farrell, Michael James. 1957. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 253–90.
Karray, Sameh Charfeddine, and Jamel eddine Chichti. 2013. “Bank Size and Efficiency in Developing Countries: Intermediation Approach Versus Value Added Approach and Impact Ff Non-Traditional Activities.” Asian Economic and Financial Review 3 (5): 593–613.
Kristensen, Troels, Peter Bogetoft, and Kjeld Moeller Pedersen. 2010. “Potential Gains from Hospital Mergers in Denmark.” Health Care Management Science 13 (4): 334–45.
Kusmargiani, Ida Savitri. 2006. “Analisis Efisiensi Operasional Dan Efisiensi Profitabilitas Pada Bank Yang Merger Dan Akuisisi Di Indonesia (Studi Pada Bank Setelah Rekapitalisasi Dan Restrukturisasi Tahun 1999-2002).”
Mulyaningsih, Tri, and Anne Daly. 2009. “Competitive Conditions In Banking Industry: An Empirical Analysis Of The Consolidation, Competition And Concentration In The Indonesia Banking Industry Between 2001 And 2009.” Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 141–76.
Santoso, Ruddy Tri. 2010. “Pengaruh Merger Dan Akuisisi Terhadap Efisiensi Perbankan Di Indonesia ( Tahun 1998-2009 ).” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan.
Sealey, Calvin W, and James T Lindley. 1997. “Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions.” The Journal of Finance 32 (4): 1251–66.
Widyastuti, Ratna Sri, and Boedi Armanto. 2013. “Kompetisi Industri Perbankan Indonesia.” Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
