Interpretation of structures on Menapo Sungai Melayu II, The Muarajambi National Cultural Heritage Area: Use of the Wenner Configuration Method Interpretasi struktur di Menapo Sungai Melayu II, Kawasan Cagar Budaya Nasional Muarajambi: Penerapan Metode Konfigurasi Wenner

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Aug 23, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/jba.2023.1981
Keywords:
Resistivity, Pedology, Muarajambi, Temple, Wenner

Main Article Content

Muhammad Rifqi
Teknik Geofisika, Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Jambi
Ira Kusuma Dewi
Teknik Geofisika, Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Jambi
Irsyad Leihitu
Arkeologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Jambi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-4848

Abstract

Menapo Sungai Melayu II is located in the Muarajambi National Cultural Heritage Area. The study aims to determine the layer and structure under the surface based on the value of resistivity. The measurements of resistivity configuration are conducted by Werner’s method. Six trajectories are placed around the using flat base electrodes to minimize the risk of damaging the structure. Based on the measurements, there are three kinds of soil formations. The resistivity value that ranging from 1,07–3,84 Ωm is indicated as water-saturated sand, the value of 4,95–13,8 Ωm is indicated as sand clay, while the highest resistivity with a value of 17,84–49,90 Ωm is interpreted as a brick. The six cross-sections have an average resistivity value of around 1,07-49,90 Ωm which indicates a brick structure that exists below the surface. Based on the results of the resistivity method, some patterns can be interpreted as main structure, as roving fence, and gateway.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammad Rifqi, Ira Kusuma Dewi, & Irsyad Leihitu. (2024). Interpretation of structures on Menapo Sungai Melayu II, The Muarajambi National Cultural Heritage Area: Use of the Wenner Configuration Method: Interpretasi struktur di Menapo Sungai Melayu II, Kawasan Cagar Budaya Nasional Muarajambi: Penerapan Metode Konfigurasi Wenner. Berkala Arkeologi , 43(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.55981/jba.2023.1981
Issue
Vol. 43 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

De Coster. (1974). The geology of the central and south Sumatera basins. Proceedings Indonesian Petroleum Association.

Hendrajaya, L., & Arif, I. (1990). Metode geolistrik tahanan jenis. ITB, Bandung.

Isdarmadi, K., Susilo, A., & Sunaryo. (2013). Pendugaan struktur bawah permukaan peninggalan purbakala situs candi Jabung, Probolinggo, Indonesia menggunakan metode geolistrik resistivitas. Natural B, 2(1), 50–57.

Look. (1994). The inversion of two dimensional resistivity data. University of Birmingham.

Meilania, & Febrianti, H. (2019). Pelestarian candi Muaro Jambi sebagai benda cagar budaya dan pariwisata di provinsi Jambi. Journal V-Tech (Vision Technology), 2(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.35141/jvt.v2i1.509

Moechtar, H., & Hidayat, S. (2010). Sedimentologi dan akumulasi kasiterit pada endapan aluvium sepanjang air inas hingga laut lepas pantai Tanjung Kubu (Toboali), Bangka Selatan. Jsdg, 20(2), 59–68.

Mufidah, J. (2016). Aplikasi metode geolistrik 3D untuk menentukan situs arkeologi Biting blok Salak di desa Kutoreno kecamatan Sukodono Lumajang Jawa Timur. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Mundardjito. (2009). Muarojambi: dulu, sekarang dan esok. Balai Arkeologi Palembang.

Pasaribu Prastika, A., & Kadri, M. (2018). Penentuan sebaran situs purbakala candi Tandihat l menggunakan metode geolistrik di desa Tandihat, kabupaten Padang Lawas. Jurnal Sains Indonesia, 42(1), 7–11.

Purwanti, R. dkk. (2021). Candi Kotomahligai: fungsi dan perannya di situs kawasan percandian Muarajambi. Balai Arkeologi Provinsi Sumatera Selatan.

Rahardjo, S., Ramelan, W. D., Purwanto, S. A., & Oesman, O. (2022). Rencana induk pengelolaan kawasan cagar budaya nasional Muarajambi: buku 1. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.

Ramelan. (2014). Candi Indonesia seri Sumatera, Kalimantan, Bali, Sumbawa. Direktorat Pelestarian Cagar Budaya dan Permuseuman, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ratiwi, A. P. (2017). Biostratigrafi nannofosil gampingan dan analisis kecepatan sedimentasi pada sumur “SSB” sub-cekungan Palembang Selatan. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Rochman, J. P. G. N., Widodo, A., Bahri, A. S., Syamsuddin, F., & Wien, L. (2017). Aplikasi metode geolistrik tahanan jenis untuk mengetahui bawah permukaan. Geosaintek, 1(October), 93–98.

Sadzali, A. M. (2022). Karakteristik arsitektur percandian masa klasik di DAS Batanghari. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 06(1), 80–94.

Sedyawati, E. dkk. (2014). Candi Indonesia: seri Sumatera, Kalimantan, Bali, dan Sumbawa. Direktur Pelestarian Cagar Budaya dan Permuseuman.

Sukarna, D., Mangga, S. A., & Brata, K. (1993). Geology of the Bayah area: implications for the cenozoic evolution of the West Java, Indonesia. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 33(33), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm33199313

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied geophysics. Cambridge university press.

Widiatmoko, A. (2015). Situs Muarajambi sebagai mahavihara abad ke 7-12 masehi. Universitas Indonesia.