Gender roles in the prehistoric fishing community: A case study from Gilimanuk Site, Bali Peran gender di komunitas nelayan prasejarah: Studi kasus dari Situs Gilimanuk, Bali

Main Article Content

Dicky Caesario Wibowo

Abstract

Gender roles are defined as social construction of activities and statuses associated to specific genders in a society. This article aims to investigate gender roles among prehistoric community in Gilimanuk Sites based on the division of labor by sex. This research uses bioarchaeological approach by comparing entheseal changes on 42 male and female individuals. The result shows there is no specific activity associated to certain sex in daily subsistence. This indicates the gender construction in the prehistoric fishing community in Gilimanuk Sites.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibowo, D. C. (2024). Gender roles in the prehistoric fishing community: A case study from Gilimanuk Site, Bali: Peran gender di komunitas nelayan prasejarah: Studi kasus dari Situs Gilimanuk, Bali. Berkala Arkeologi , 41(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v41i2.631
Section
Articles

References

Adovasio, J. M., Soffer, O., & Page, J. (2007). The invisible sex (uncovering the true roles of women in prehistory). Harper Collins Books.

Agarwal, S. C., & Glencross, B. A. (Ed.). (2011). Social bioarchaeology. Wiley-Blackwell.

Arjanto, D. Q. (2017). Intensitas aktivitas fisik berdasarkan perubahan enthesis ekstrimitas atas dan kaitannya dengan nilai bekal kubur individu laki-laki dewasa dari Situs Gilimanuk. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Aufderheide, A. C., & Rodríguez-Martín, C. (2006). The cambrigde encyclopedia of human paleopathology (Third). Cambridge University Press.

Aziz, F. A. (1995). Kajian arkeologi-demografi di Situs Gilimanuk (Bali), dari Masa Perundagian. Universitas Indonesia.

Brown, J. K. (1970). A note on the division of labor by sex. American Anthropologist, 72, 1073–1078.

Capasso, L., Kennedy, K. A. R., & Wilczak, C. A. (1998). Atlas of occupational markers on human remains (First). Edigrafial Sp.A-S.

Clarke, D. L. (2015). Analytical archaeology (2nd Eds). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00044240

Conkey, M. W., & Spector, J. D. (1984). Archaeology and the study of gender. Advances in archaeological method and theory, 7, 1–38.

D.White, Т., T.Black, M., & A.Folkens, P. (2012). Human Osteology (Third). Academic Press.

Eshed, V., Gopher, A., Galili, E., & Hershkovitz, I. (2004). Musculoskeletal stress markers in Natufian hunter-gatherers and neolithic farmers in the Levant: The upper limb. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 123(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10312

Geller, P. L. (2005). Skeletal Analysis and Theoretical Analysis. World Archaeology, 37(4), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240500404391

Geller, P. L. (2009). Identity and difference: Complicating gender in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414

Gilchrist, R. (2001). Gender and archaeology: Contesting the past. Routledge.

Grauer, A. L. (Ed.). (2012). A companion to paleopathology. John Wiley & Sons.

Haas, R., Watson, J., Buonasera, T., Southon, J., Chen, J. C., Noe, S., Smith, K., Llave, C. V., Eerkens, J., & Parker, G. (2020). Female hunters of the early Americas. Science Advances, 6(45), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.ABD0310

Hawkey, D. E., & Merbs, C. F. (1995). Activity‐induced musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM) and subsistence strategy changes among ancient Hudson Bay Eskimos. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 5(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1390050403

Hollimon, S. E. (2011). Sex and gender in bioarchaeological research (theory, method, and interpretation). In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Ed.), Social bioarchaeology. Blackwell Publishing.

Kifli, A. B. (1998). Analisis jenis kelamin serta usia mati rangka manusia dan benda bekal kubur di Situs Gilimanuk [Universitas Indonesia].

Peran gender di komunitas nelayan prasejarah: Studi kasus dari Situs Gilimanuk, Bali (Universitas Indonesia) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Kingston, B. (2005). Understanding muscles (A practical guide to muscle function). Chapman & Hall.

Koesbardiati, T., Murti, D., & Suriyanto, R. (2015). Cultural dental modification in prehistoric population in Indonesia. Bulletin of the International Association for Paleodontology, 9(2), 52–60.

Larsen, C. S. (1987). Bioarchaeological interpretations of subsistence economy and behavior from human skeletal remains. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 10(1987), 339–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-003110-8.50009-8

Larsen, C. S. (2002). Bioarchaeology: the lives and lifestyles of past people. Journal of archaeological research, 10(2), 119–166.

Lewin, E. (2006). Feminist anthropology. In E. Lewin (Ed.), Theory in social and cultural anthropology: An encyclopedia. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276311.n81

Lindsey, L. L. (2016). Gender roles: A sociological perspective (L. L. Lindsey (Ed.); 6th ed.). Routledge.

Malinowski, B. (1913). The family among the australian Aborigines (A sociological study). University of London Press.

Mariotti, V., Facchini, F., & Belcastro, M. G. (2004). Enthesopathies - Proposal of a standardized scoring method and applications. Collegium Antropologicum, 28(1), 145–159.

Martin, D. L., Harrod, R. P., & Pérez, V. R. (2013). Bioarchaeology : An Integrated Approach to Working with Human Remains. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6378-8

Mendenhall, C. D., Hayes, V. G., Margolis, J. R., Dorfman, E., Mendenhall, C. D., Hayes, V. G., Margolis, J. R., Dorfman, E., Mendenhall, C. D., & Margolis, J. R. (2020). Behaviour in a natural history museum diversifying displays of biological sex and sexual behaviour in a natural history museum. https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2020.1806597

Milner, C. E. (2008). Functional anatomy for sport and exercise: Quick reference. In . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203886205

Niinimäki, S. (2011). What do muscle marker ruggedness scores actually tell us? International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 21(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1134

Permana, R. C. E. (1989). Identifikasi dan fungsi hewan Gilimanuk (suatu analisis data lapangan). Universitas Indonesia.

Prasetyo, B. (1993). Kajian fungsi artefak perunggu: Studi kasus Situs Plawangan, Gilimanuk, dan Pasir Angin. AHPA IV “Metalurgi dalam Arkeologi,” 143–151.

Prayudi, A., & Suriyanto, R. A. (2017). Osteobiografi individu Nomor 38 dari situs prasejarah Gilimanuk. Amerta, 35(1).

Ramelan, W. D. (1986). Ekuilibrium budaya dan lingkungan hidup:Kajian ekologi budaya pada komunitas nelayan sederhana pada Abad II-IV di Pulau Gilimanuk. Universitas Indonesia.

Schimdt, R. A., & Voss, B. L. (2000). Archaeologies of sexuality. In R. A. Schimdt & B. L. Voss (Ed.), Archaeologies of Sexuality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203991879

Soejono, R. P. (1977). Sistem kubur pada akhir masa prasejarah di Bali. Universitas Indonesia.

Spector, J. D. (1983). Male/female task differentiation among the Hidatsa: Toward the development of an archaeological approach to the study of gender. In P. Albers (Ed.), The hidden half : Studies of plains Indian women. VNR AG.

Suriyanto, R. A., Jacob, T., Aswin, S., & Indriati, E. (2006). Kajian perbandingan karakteristik epigenetis populasi tengkorak manusia Paleometalik Gilimanuk (Bali) dan Liang Bua, Lewoleba, Melolo dan Ntodo Leseh (Nusa Tenggara Timur). Humanika, 19(2006).

Sutton, M. Q. A. E. ., & Anderson, E. N. (2010). Introduction to cultural ecology (2nd Ed). AltaMira Press.

Wibowo, D. C. (2017). Rekonstruksi aktivitas fisik berdasarkan perubahan enthesis (entheseal change) pada rangka manusia dari Situs Gilimanuk, Bali. Universitas Indonesia.

Zihlman, A. (2013). Engendering human evolution. In D. Bolger (Ed.), A companion to gender prehistory. Wiley-Blackwell.