MAYORITAS KERAMIK YUAN DI TROWULAN: KONTRA REALITA HUBUNGAN MAJAPAHIT €“ CINA PADA ABAD KE 13-15 MASEHI

Main Article Content

Vida Pervaya Rusianti Kusmartono

Abstract


The Majapahit Empire and its relationship with China demonstrated the implementation of policies that did not always work harmoniously. This is inseparable from the background conditions of each kingdom. Political instability, both at home and abroad, was marked by misunderstandings, rebellions or wars and the severance of bilateral relations between Majapahit and China. However, archaeological data show an interesting phenomenon that political factors do not have a significant impact on socio-economic aspects. Yuan ceramics that were found in abundance at the Trowulan Site - especially in the Nglinguk, Sentonorejo, and Pendopo Agung Sectors - prove that exchange or trading activities continue to be effective. The continuation of this activity is thought to have occurred due to the use of two methods of exchange / trade, namely legal and illegal, which were carried out by traders who often stopped by in Majapahit.



 

Article Details

How to Cite
Kusmartono, V. P. R. (2024). MAYORITAS KERAMIK YUAN DI TROWULAN: KONTRA REALITA HUBUNGAN MAJAPAHIT €“ CINA PADA ABAD KE 13-15 MASEHI. Berkala Arkeologi , 22(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v22i1.847
Section
Articles

References

Amelia S. 1988, Peranan Mata Vang Logam Cina pada Masa Majapahit. Analisis Hasil Penelitian Trowulan 7-11 November 1988. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional

Assael, Henry, 1984, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action 2nd edition. Boston: Kent Publishing Company.

Astawa, A.A. Gde Oka, 1988, Tinjauan Pendahuluan Per-dagangan Masa Lampau. Analisis Hasil Penelitian Trowulan 7-11 November 1988

Cooper, J.C., I 993, An Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Traditional Symbols. London : Thames and Hudson.

Djafar, Hasan, 1974, Girindrawarddhana. Beberapa Masalah Majapahit Akhir. Skripsi. FS-llmu-ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia.

Feng, 1981, A Description of Foreign Countries.

Garnsey, Wanda & Rewi Alley, I 983, China : Ancinet Kilns and Modern Ceramics. A Guide to the Potters. Canberra : Australia National University Press

Groeneveldt, W.P., I 960, Historical Notes on Indonesia and Malaya. Jakarta Bhratara

Gwinn, Robert P. et.al., 1990, The New Britannica Encyclopaedia. Chicago Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

Hadimulyono, 1986, Keramik Asing Sawankhalok dari Thailand yang ditemukan di daerah Sulawesi Selatan. Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi III. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Hirth, F. & W.W. Rockhill, Chau Ju Kua. Amsterdam: Oriental Press. Kartodirdjo, Sartono et.al, 1993, 700 Tahon Majapahit (1293-1993). Suatu Bunga Rampai. Surabaya : Dinas Pariwisata Darah Tingkat I Jawa Timur.

Ku-cheng, Chou, I 962, China's Later Middle Ages. Highlights of Chinese History. Peking : China Reconstructs

Miksic, John N. & Endang SH Soekatno (ed), 1995, The Legacy of Majapahit. Singapore : National Heritage Board.

Mills, J .V ., 1984, Chinese Navigators in Insulinde A.D. 1500. SP AF A Consultative Workshop on Research on Maritime Shipping and Trade Networks in Southeast Asia. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Mundardjito et.al, 1986, Bukti-bukti Kejayaan Majapahit Muncul Kembali : Rencana lnduk Arkeologi Bekas Kota Kerajaan Majapahit Trowulan. Jakarta : Proyek Pemugaran dan Pemeliharaan Peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala.

Po-tsan, Chien, Shao Hsun-cheng & Hu Hua, 1964, Concise History of China. Peking: Foreign Language Press.

Reischauer, Edwin O. & John K. Fairbank, 1958, East Asia the Great Tradition. A History

Reischauer, Edwin O. & John K. Fairbank, 1960, of East Asian Civilization Volume 1. Boston Houghton Mifflin Company.

Sartono, S., 1978, Pusat-pusal Kerajaan Sriwijaya berdasarkan lnterpretasi Paleogeografi. Pra Seminar Penelitian Sriwijaya. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Satari, Soejatmi, 1980, Beberapa Data sebagai Sumbangan untuk Penelitian Bekas lbukota Majapahit. Pertemuan Ilmiab Arkeologi I. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Shepard, Anna 0., 1965, Ceramics for the Arcaheologist. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Slametmuljana, 1976, A Story of Majapahit. Singapore: Singapore University Press

Slametmuljana, 1979, Nagarakretagama dan Tafsir Sejarahnya. Jakarta : Bhratara Karya Aksara.

Slametmuljana, 1983, Pemugaran Persada Sejarah Leluhur Majapahit. Jakarta Inti ldayu Press.

Soemadio (ed), 1993, Sejarah Nasional Indonesia Jilid IL Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Southeast Asian Ceramic Society, 1983, Song Ceramics. Singapore Koon Wah Printing Pte Ltd.

Tim Penelitian Trowulan, Penelitian Trowulan 1/76; JJ/77; JJJ/78; JV/79;

Tim Penelitian Trowulan, 1988 V/80; VI/81; VII/82; VIII/82; IX/83; X-XJ/85; XIJ/86; X/11/87; XJV/88. Laporan Harian Unit Penelitian Arkeologi Klasik. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional. Tidak diterbitkan.

Watt, J.C.Y., 1984, The Dating on Chinese Ceramics and Archaeological Sites in South East Asia : A Preliminary Draft. Studies on Ceramics. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Wibisono, Naniek Harkantiningsih, 1996, Studi Hubungan Kronologi Situs dengan Jalur-jalur Perdagangan Abad· ke-9-14 Masehi Evaluasi hasil Penelitian Arkeologi Ujungpandang, 20-26 September 1996. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Wong, Grace, 1984, An Account of the maritime Trade Routes between Southeast Asia and China. Studies on Ceramics. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.