Plosorejo Inscription as New Data of Sindok Period in Ancient Indonesian History: Structure and Dating Study Prasasti Plosorejo sebagai Data Baru Masa Sindok dalam Sejarah Indonesia Kuno: Kajian Struktur dan Penanggalan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Plosorejo inscription, which has been established as a cultural heritage at the district/city level, has not yet been published in its complete edition. The research on Plosorejo Inscription resulted several new findings that can contribute to the addition of data in ancient Indonesian history. This research is an epigraphic research or text-aided archaeology with text as the main focus to reconstruct ancient Indonesian history. This paper presents the results of script translation, structure analysis, and dating analysis. The result of this research shows that Plosorejo Inscription has two parts, which are Plosorejo A and B Inscriptions. The structure of the inscription shows an indication that the inscription has two dates that begin two different decrees regarding sīma that are interrelated. The date that is still legible in the Plosorejo inscription, 852 Ś/930 AD, is the date that begins the Plosorejo B inscription. The inscription was published in that year or even earlier. Based on the dating component, the figure of Sri Maharaja whose name is no longer legible refers to Siṇḍok. Therefore, the Plosorejo Inscription can be placed to the early inscriptions of the Siṇḍok Period
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bakker, J. W. M. (1972). Ilmu prasasti Indonesia. Djurusan Sedjarah Budaja, IKIP Sanata Dharma.
Baried, S. B., Soeratno, S. C., Sawoe, Sutrisno, S., & Syakir, Moh. (1985). Pengantar teori Filologi. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Boechari. (1976). Some considerations of the problem of the shift of Mataram’s center of government from Central to East Java in the 10th Century A.D. Bulletin of the Research Centre of Archaeology of Indonesia.
Boechari. (2012a). Sri Maharaja Mapanji Garasakan new evidence on the problem of Airlangga’s partition of his kingdom. In Melacak sejarah kuno Indonesia lewat prasasti (pp. 135–154). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Boechari. (2012b). Transkripsi (dan terjemahan) aneka prasasti. In Melacak sejarah kuno Indonesia lewat prasasti (pp. 473–528). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Bosch, F. D. K. (1925). Oudheidkundige Verslag 1925. Albrecht & Co., M. Nijhoff.
Brandes, J. L. A. (1913). Oud Javaansche oorkonden. In Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen: Vol. LX. Albrecht & Co, M. Nijhoff.
Budiono, H., Widiatmoko, S., Budianto, A., & Afandi, Z. (2018). Inventaris cagar budaya Kecamatan Badas, Ngampeng Rejo, Ngrogol dan Gurah Kabupaten Kediri. ABDINUS: Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara, 1(2), 126–132.
Casparis, J. G. de. (1958). Airlangga. In Pidato inaugurasi Prof. Dr. J. G. de Casparis, Guru Besar dalam Sedjarah Indonesia Lama dan Bahasa Sansekerta pada Perguruan Tinggi Pendidikan Guru Universitas Airlangga di Malang. Universitas Airlangga.
Casparis, J. G. de. (1978). Indonesian chronology. E.J. Brill.
Casparis, J. G. de. (1985). Sedikit tentang golongan-golongan di dalam masyarakat Jawa Kuno. AMERTA, 2, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.24832/amt.v2i0.422
Casparis, J. G. de. (1994). Some notes on transfer of capitals in ancient Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia. Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi VI, 367–386.
Casparis, J. G. de. (1988). Where was Pu Sindok’s capital situated? In H. I. R. Hinzler (Ed.), S&SE Asian Archaeology (Vol. 2, pp. 39–52). Koentji Press.
Christie, J. W. (1999). Register of the inscription of Java 732-1060 A.D. (The inscriptions of Mataram). Working Draft.
Damais, L.-C. (1951). I. Études d’épigraphie Indonésienne: I. Méthode de réduction des dates Javanaises en dates Européennes. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient, 45(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1951.5509
Damais, L.-C. (1952). I. Études d’épigraphie Indonésienne: III. Liste des principales inscriptions datées de l’indonésie. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient, 46(1), 1–106. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1952.5158
Damais, L.-C. (1955). II. Etudes d’épigraphie Indonésienne: IV. Discussion de la date des inscriptions. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient, 47(1), 7–290. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1955.5406
Darmosoetopo, R. (2003). Sīma dan bangunan keagamaan di Jawa abad IX-X TU. Prana Pena.
Dwiyanto, D. (1998). Manfaat prasasti bagi penulisan sejarah lokal. Berkala Arkeologi, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v18i1.771
Hoang, P. (1910). Concordance des chronologies néoméniques Chinoise et Européenne. Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique.
Jones, A. M. B. (1984). Early tenth century Java from the inscription. Foris Publications.
Kartakusuma, R. (1992). Prof. Boechari dan penelitian Epigrafi Indonesia. Kebudayaan, II 1992/1993(4).
Kartoatmodjo, M. M. S. (1985). Harijadi Kediri. Lembaga Javanologi-Universitas Kadiri.
Krom, N. J. (1931). Hindoe-Javaansche geschiedenis (2nd ed.). Martinus Nijhoff.
Maziyah, S. (2018). Implikasi prasasti dan kekuasaan pada masa Jawa Kuna. Anuva, 2(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.2.2.177-192
Nakada, K. (1982). An inventory of the dated inscriptions in Java. The Memoirs of The Tokyo Bunko, 40.
Poesponegoro, M. D., & Notosusanto, N. (2010). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia II: Zaman Kuno. Balai Pustaka.
Prasodjo, T. (1998). Epigrafi Indonesia: peran, kedudukan, dan pengembangannya. Berkala Arkeologi, 18(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v18i1.772
Sambodo, G. A. (2023). Plosorejo: 3D model. Https://Sketchfab.Com/3d-Models/Plosorejo-468a12704f3d4ea39c762d8235bedddb.
Santosa, HB. H. (1994). Prasasti Tulang Er 198 Sanjaya. Berkala Arkeologi, 14(2), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v14i2.720
Schrieke, B. J. O. (1957). Indonesian sociological studies: ruler and realm in Early Java (Vol. 2). W. van Hoeve Ltd - The Hague.
Stutterheim, W. F. (1925). Een oorkonde op koper uit het Singasarische. In Tijdschrift voor Indische Taak Land en Volkenkunde (pp. 208–281). Albrecht & Co., M. Nijhoff.
Suhadi, M. (1978). Penelitian prasasti di Indonesia. Lokakarya Arkeologi, 61–71.
Tanudirjo, D. A. (1994). Epigrafi Indonesia dalam kerangka pikir pasca-modernisme. Berkala Arkeologi, 14(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v14i2.634
Trigangga. (2003). Tiga prasasti jaman Raja Sindok. Museum Nasional.
van Stein Callenfels, P. V. (1934). De inscriptie van Soekaboemi. In Mededeelingen Der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde Deel 78, Serie B, No. 4. N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Vitgevers Maatschappij.
Wicaksono, A. A. (2014). Pembacaan ulang Prasasti Mangulihi A dan Mangulihi B (kajian paloegrafis dan telaah isi prasasti). Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
