Study on The Development of Guidance System Technology for 122-140 mm Artillery Rocket

Authors

  • Widianto Nugroho Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Riyadl Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Novi Muslimin Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Rudi Setiawan Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Robertus Heru Triharjanto Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Y. H. Yogaswara Faculty of Defense Technlogy, Indonesia Defense University Sentul, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2021.v19.a3691

Keywords:

MRLS, Rocket, Control system, Canard, Thurster, Circular Error Probable

Abstract

The increase in rocket Artillery accuracy means there will be fewer rockets to be used to destroy a target. This could reduce the needed budget and risk of weapon mobilization. Therefore, this research investigates the advancement in the guidance system technology for Artillery rockets, especially for 122-140 mm caliber. The objective of the research is to find a direction for the development guidance system for the Indonesian Artillery rocket (RHAN). The research use the descriptive-analytic method, in which data was collected from literature studies and inductive analysis was performed. The data shows two kinds of actuators were used, a canard and thrusters. In canard mode, 2 strategies were used, i.e. with bearing to isolate the roll from the rocket, in which 5 control algorithms were used, and without bearing, which 2 control algorithms were used. In thruster mode, there was 5 control algorithms used. Further analysis shows that the best performance is obtained from 2 modes of the canard strategy with bearing, and 2 modes of the thruster strategy. Therefore, it is concluded that the 4 modes can be used to be implemented in RHAN which needs to be added to the control system.  

References

A. E. Gamble and P. N. Jenkins. (2000). Low Cost Guidance for the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Artillery Rocket. in IEEE.. Position Location and Navigation Symposium (Cat. No. 00CH37062), 2000, pp. 193–199.

B. Pavkovic, M. Pavic, and D. Cuk. (2012). Enhancing the Precision of Artillery Rockets Using Pulsejet Control Systems with Active Damping. Sci. Tech. Rev., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 10–19, 2012.

B. T. Burchett. (2014). Predictive Optimal Pulse-Jet Control for Symmetric Projectiles. in AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, p. 883.

F. Mingireanu et al. (2014). Trajectory Modeling of GRAD Rocket with Low-Cost Terminal Guidance Upgrade Coupled to RangecIncrease Through Step-Like Thrust-Curves,†no. October. doi: 10.21608/asat.2013.22052.

L. Zhao. (2018). Acceleration Autopilot for a Guided Spinning Rocket via Adaptive Output Feedback. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, pp. 1–12, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.04.012.

M. Gao, Y. Zhang, and S. Yang. (2015). Firing Control Optimization of Impulse Thrusters for Trajectory Correction Projectiles,†vol. 2015.

M. Gao, Y. Zhang, S. Yang, and D. Fang. (2016). Trajectory Correction Capability Modeling of the Guided Projectiles with Impulse Thrusters,†no. February

M. K. Siddiq, F. J. Cheng, and Y. W. Bo. (2012). State Dependent Riccati Equation Based Roll Autopilot for 122mm Artillery Rocket,†vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 2814–2822.

M. K. Siddiq, F. J. Cheng, and Y. W. Bo. (2013). SDRE Based Integrated Roll , Yaw and Pitch Controller Design for 122 mm Artillery Rocket. vol. 415, pp. 200–208, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.415.200.

N. Gligorijević, S. Antonović, S. Živković, B. Pavković, and V. Rodić. (2016). Thermal and Acceleration Load Analysis of New 122 mm Rocket Propellant Grain. vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 3–11.

O. S. Dullum, K. Fulmer, N. R. Jenzen-Jones, C. Lincoln-Jones, D. G. Palacio, and N. R. Jenzen-Jones. (2017). Indirect Fire: A technical Analysis of the Employment, Accuracy, and Effects of Indirect-Fire Artillery Weapons. Armament Res. Serv. Spec. Report, Perth, Aust., pp. 77–81,

P. Solano-López, R. de Celis, M. Fuentes, L. Cadarso, and A. Barea. (2019). Strategies for High Performance GNSS/IMU Guidance, Navigation and Control of Rocketry. in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, Madrid, Spain, pp. 1–4.

Q. Guo, W. Song, M. Gao, and D. Fang. (2016). Advanced Guidance Law Design for Trajectory-Corrected Rockets with Canards under Single Channel Control.

R. de Celis and L. Cadarso. (2018). GNSS/IMU Laser Quadrant Detector Hybridization Techniques for Artillery Rocket Guidance. Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 2683–2698.

R. de Celis and L. Cadarso. (2018). Hybridized Attitude Determination Techniques to Improve Ballistic Projectile Navigation, Guidance and Control. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 77, pp. 138–148.

R. de Celis, L. Cadarso, and J. Sánchez. (2017). Guidance And Control for High Dynamic Rotating Artillery Rockets. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 64, pp. 204–212.

R. Głębocki and M. Jacewicz. (2020). Parametric Study of Guidance of a 160-mm Projectile Steered with Lateral Thrusters. Aerospace, vol. 7, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3390/aerospace7050061.

R. Ozog, M. Jacewicz, and R. Glebocki. (2020). Modified Trajectory Tracking Guidance for Artillery Rocket. J. Theor. Appl. Mech., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 611–622, doi: 10.15632/jtam-pl/121981.

S. Mandic. (2016). Dispersion Reduction of Artillery Rockets Guided by Flight Path Steering Method,†Aeronaut. J., vol. 120, no. 1225, p. 435.

S. Yang. (2020). Impact-Point-Based Guidance of a Spinning Artillery Rocket Using Canard Cyclic Control. J. Guid. Control. Dyn., no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.2514/1.G004956.

S. Yang. (2020). Impact-Point-Based Guidance of a Spinning Artillery Rocket Using Canard Cyclic Control. J. Guid. Control. Dyn., no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.2514/1.G004956.

Sutrisno. (2019). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Tahun 2019. [Online]. Available:https://kinerja.lapan.go.id/getfilepublic/public/LAKIN-98579424-Lakin Pustekroket 2019.pdf.

W. Zhou, S. Yang, and L. Zhao. (2016). Retuning the Actuator Proportional – Integral – Derivative Controller of Spinning Missiles. vol. 0, no. 5, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1177/0954410016668909.

Z. Guo, X. Yao, and X. Zhang. (2016). Robust Gain Scheduled Longitudinal Autopilot Design for Rockets During the Sustaining Phase. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I J. Syst. Control Eng., vol. 230, no. 10, pp. 1154–1163, doi: 10.1177/0959651816670758.

Z. Shi, L. Zhao, and Y. Zhu. (2018). Robust Adaptive Output Feedback Control for a Guided Spinning Rocket. vol. 2018.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Nugroho, W., Riyadl, A., Muslimin, A. N., Setiawan, R., Triharjanto, R. H., & Yogaswara, Y. H. (2021). Study on The Development of Guidance System Technology for 122-140 mm Artillery Rocket. Indonesian Journal of Aerospace, 19(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2021.v19.a3691

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.