ANALISIS KANDUNGAN ALUMINIUM POWDER PROPELAN BERDASAR ENERGI PEMBAKARAN DARI BOMB KALORIMETER (ANALYSIS OF PROPELLANT’S ALUMINUM POWDER CONTENT BASED ON BURNING ENERGY FROM BOMB CALORIMETER)

Authors

  • Kendra Hartaya Pusat Teknologi Roket Lembaga Penerbangan dan Antariksa Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2016.v14.a2949

Keywords:

Analisis, Propelan, Aluminium, Kalorimeter bom

Abstract

Telah dilakukan analisis hasil penelitian propelan dengan variabel kandungan aluminium terhadap hasil energi pembakaran. Pengukuran besarnya energi pembakaran propelan dilakukan dengan bomb calorimeter. Sampel propelan dibuat dengan mencampur HTPB dan aluminium selama 15 emnit dilanjutkan pencampuran dengan AP halus selama 20 menit, lalu dengan AP kasar selama 50 mrnit. Setelah pengadukan berakhir maka ditambahkan TDI dan diaduk selama 15 menit. Kandungan Al di variasi dari 8% hingga 18%. Energi pembakaran yang dihasilkan adalah 2885 kal/gr hingga 3750 kal/gr. Pada 18% Al energi pembakaran mulai menurun. Penurunan ini diakibatkan oleh sebagian besar sampel yang terbakar sama dengan sampel yang mengalami erosiv.

References

Campos, E.A; Rita C.L.D; Luis C; Milton F.D;

Wilma, M.N; and K. Iha, 2010. Performace

Evaluation of Commercial Copper

Chromites as Burning Rate Catalyst for

Solid propellant, J. Aerosp.Technol.

Manag., Vol 2 No 3, 323-330.

De Luca, L.T; Luciano G; Filippo Ma; Giovanni C;

Christian; Alice R; Staefano D; Marco F;

and A. Sossi, 2014. Characterization and

Combustion of Aluminum Nanopowders

in Energetic Systems, Wiley-VCH Verlag

GmbH & Co.

Hartaya, K; Luthfia H.A; dan Retno A, 2013.

Aplication of Density Property as

Alternative Propellant Performance for

Accelerating the Development of

Propellant Composition, Prosiding

International Seminar of Aeronautics

and Space Science and Technology,

Serpong.

Hartaya, K; Luthfia H.A; dan Retno A, 2014.

Penentuan Kandungan Oksidator Berdasar

Reaksi Stoikiometri dan Struktur Kristal

Dalam rangkan Adopsi Formulasi Propelan

HLP, Jurnal Teknologi Dirgantara Vol.

No. 2 Desember, 102-115.

Kishore, K., and K. Sridhara, 1999. Solid

Propellant Chemistry, Ministry of

Difense, New Delhi.

Kitinirunkul, Thirapat., Nattawat W., and

K.Prapunkan, 2013. Affecting Factor of

The Mechanical Properties Phenolic/

Fiber Composite, International journal

of Chemical Materials Science and

Engineering vol. 7, no. 10.

Mohamed, A.; Mugamed F.; Gholamian; and A.

R. Zarei, 2013. Performance Analysis of

Composite Propellant Based on HTPB–

DNCB, Journal of Propulsion and Power

vo.l 30, no. 2.

Nair, U.R.; S.N. Asthana; A. Subhananda; and

B.R. Gandhe, 2010. Advances in High

Energy Materials, Defense Science

Journal v 60 no 2, 137-151.

Rafi, A; T. Jayachandran T; and R. Hari, 2010.

Numerical Simulation of Solid Propellant

Casting using Unstructured Finite

Volume Methdod, Proceeding of the 37th

National & 4th intrnatioanl conference

on Fluid Mechanics and Power – India.

Ramesh, K; N. Shekhar; S.S. Jawalkar; and M.

Bikash Bhattacharya, 2012. Development

of a Composite Propellant Formulation

with a High Performance Index Using a

Pressure Casting Technique, Central

European Journal of Energetic

Materials, 9(1), 4958.

Sarner, S.F., 1967. Propellant Chemistry,

Reinhold, New York, 112.

Styborski, J.A; J. Matthew; M.N.S. Scorza; and

M.A. Oehlschlaeger, 2010. Iron

Nanoparticle Additives as Burning Rate

Enhancers in AP/HTPB Composite

Propellants, Propellants Explos,

Pyrotech. 2010, 35, Wiley-VCH, 1-8.

Sutton, G.P., and O. Biblarz, 2001. Rocket

Propulsion Elements, edisi 7, John Wiley

& sons.

Zohari, N; H.K. Mohammad; S.A. Seyedsadjadi,

The Advantages and Shortcomings

of using Nano-sized Energetic Materials,

Central European Journal of Energetic

Materials 10(1), 135-147.

Downloads

Published

07-07-2025

How to Cite

Hartaya, K. (2025). ANALISIS KANDUNGAN ALUMINIUM POWDER PROPELAN BERDASAR ENERGI PEMBAKARAN DARI BOMB KALORIMETER (ANALYSIS OF PROPELLANT’S ALUMINUM POWDER CONTENT BASED ON BURNING ENERGY FROM BOMB CALORIMETER). Indonesian Journal of Aerospace, 14(1 Juni), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2016.v14.a2949

Most read articles by the same author(s)