Flatwise Testing Modeling Study On Aluminium Honeycomb Panel

Authors

  • Sri Ramayanti Research Center for Satellite Technology, BRIN, In

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2022.v20.a3937

Keywords:

Honeycomb structures, flatwise tensile testing, Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Abstract

Honeycomb sandwich structures are widely used in space applications due to their exceptional performance. Extensive research has been conducted on the response of honeycomb structures to various external loads. The out-of-plane strength, including compression and tensile properties, is a critical aspect of honeycomb structures. Despite some experimental and numerical studies, research specifically addressing the tensile direction, such as flatwise tensile testing in honeycombs, remains limited. This testing focuses on the bond strength between the face sheets and the honeycomb core, as well as the tensile strength of the core itself. Utilizing finite element analysis (FEA) has proven effective for characterizing honeycomb structures under various load conditions. However, the complex geometry of the core requires an enormous number of elements, increasing computation times. Thus, simplifying the model by replacing the hexagonal geometry with a homogenized solid layer with effective material properties is necessary. This study focuses on flatwise tensile testing of aluminum honeycomb using different modeling approaches: discrete, continuum, and equivalent plate models. The discrete model serves as the reference due to its detailed structural representation. The continuum-Gibson model, while reasonably accurate in stress estimation, tends to overestimate displacement. Both equivalent models, Hoff and Reissner, significantly overestimate displacement, with Hoff underestimating stress and Reissner overestimating it. In contrast, equivalent models offer insights, but their accuracy varies, necessitating further calibration for precise predictions. Future research should validate these simulation results with real tests. 

References

S. D. Pan, L. Z. Wu, Y. G. Sun, Z. G. Zhou, and J. L. Qu, “Longitudinal shear strength and failure process of honeycomb cores,” Compos Struct, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 42–46, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.011.

J. R. Tanzman, “Material considerations in the STEREO solar array design,” Acta Astronaut, vol. 63, no. 11–12, pp. 1239–1245, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.06.027.

S. Ramayanti, P. A. Budiantoro, A. Fauzi, E. Fitrianingsih, and E. N. Nasser, “Comparative Study of Deployable Satellite Solar Panel Structure between Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer and Al-7075 Honeycomb,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology, ICARES 2022 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICARES56907.2022.9993517.

[B. J. Kim and D. G. Lee, “Development of a satellite structure with the sandwich T-joint,” Compos Struct, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 460–468, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.030.

L. Teng, X. D. Zheng, and Z. H. Jin, “Performance optimization and verification of a new type of solar panel for microsatellites,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/2846491.

K. Il Song, J. Y. Choi, J. H. Kweon, J. H. Choi, and K. S. Kim, “An experimental study of the insert joint strength of composite sandwich structures,” Compos Struct, vol. 86, no. 1–3, pp. 107–113, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.027.

S. Sorohan, D. M. Constantinescu, M. Sandu, and A. G. Sandu, “On the homogenization of hexagonal honeycombs under axial and shear loading. Part I: Analytical formulation for free skin effect,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 119, pp. 74–91, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.09.003.

ASTM International, “Standard Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions-ASTM C297,” 2004 [Online]. Available: www.astm.org,

D. Widagdo, A. Kuswoyo, T. O. Nurpratama, and B. K. Hadi, “Experimental flatwise tensile strength dataset of carbon fibre reinforced plastic sandwich panels with different core material preparations,” Data Brief, vol. 28, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105055.

R. Roy, K. H. Nguyen, Y. B. Park, J. H. Kweon, and J. H. Choi, “Testing and modeling of NomexTM honeycomb sandwich Panels with bolt insert,” Compos B Eng, vol. 56, pp. 762–769, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.006.

S. Sorohan, D. M. Constantinescu, M. Sandu, and A. G. Sandu, “In-plane homogenization of commercial hexagonal honeycombs considering the cell wall curvature and adhesive layer influence,” Int J Solids Struct, vol. 156–157, pp. 87–106, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.007.

J. Yuan, L. Zhang, and Z. Huo, “An Equivalent Modeling Method for Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Based on Orthogonal Anisotropic Solid Element,” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 957–969, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42405-020-00259-6.

N. Ahmed, N. Zafar, and H. Z. Janjua, “Homogenization of Honeycomb Core in Sandwich Structures: A Review,” Proceedings of 2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology, pp. 159–173, Jan. 2019.

L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby, and G. S. Schajer, “The Mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials,” Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci, vol. A 382, pp. 25–42, 1982.

W. Wang et al., “Comparative application analysis and test verification on equivalent modeling theories of honeycomb sandwich panels for satellite solar arrays,” Advanced Composites Letters, vol. 29. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020. doi: 10.1177/0963693520963127.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2022

How to Cite

Ramayanti, S. (2022). Flatwise Testing Modeling Study On Aluminium Honeycomb Panel. Indonesian Journal of Aerospace, 20(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2022.v20.a3937

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.