Revolusi Arkeologi Digital Analisis Literatur terhadap Dampak Transformasi Teknologi
Main Article Content
Abstract
The transformation of digital technology has significantly impacted global archaeological practices, including methods of data collection, analysis, and dissemination. This study aims to examine how digital archaeology revolutionizes conventional approaches through a systematic literature review. The research method involves identifying and analyzing relevant scholarly literature, particularly concerning the use of LiDAR, GIS, photogrammetry, and artificial intelligence in archaeological studies. The findings reveal that digital technologies not only accelerate documentation and interpretation but also broaden access to archaeological data for both researchers and the public. Nevertheless, this transformation presents challenges, including the need for technical competence, ethical considerations in digital representation, and infrastructure limitations in developing countries. This research highlights the importance of critically understanding the paradigm shift in archaeological practice and the necessity for methodological adaptation and interdisciplinary collaboration moving forward.
Article Details
References
Bevan, Andrew. 2012. Spatial Methods for Analysing Large-scale Artefact Inventories. Antiquity, 86(332): 492–5.
Cortez, Rodrigo, et al. 2021. The Use of UAV and LiDAR for Archaeological Surveying in Remote Tropical Environments. Remote Sensing, 13(18): 3738.
Dallas, Costis. 2015. Digital Curation beyond the “Wild Frontier”: A Pragmatic Approach. Archæologia e Calcolatori, 26: 133–144.
De Reu, Jeroen, et al. 2013. Applications of Photogrammetry in Surveying and Recording of Archaeological Sites: From 2D Recording to 3D Model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(2): 1108–1121.
Fernandez-Hernandez, Jesus, et al. 2015. 3D Laser Scanning for Documentation and Conservation of Heritage Sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(6): 699–706.
Huggett, Jeremy. 2012. Lost in Information? Re-Assessing the Role of the Digital in Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 45(1): 39–54.
Huggett, Jeremy. 2020. Resilient Scholarship in the Digital Age. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 3(1): 151–162.
Kintigh, Keith W., et al. 2015. Grand Challenges for Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 111(3): 879–880.
Morgan, Colleen L. dan Eve, Stuart. 2012. DIY and Digital Archaeology: What Are You Doing to Participate? World Archaeology, 44(4): 521–537.
Opitz, Rachel, dan Herrmann, Jason. 2018. Recent Trends and Long-Standing Problems in Archaeological Remote Sensing. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 18: 448–458.
Reilly, Paul. 2015. Additive Archaeology: The Spirit of Virtual Archaeology Revisited. In Open Access Series in Archaeology. Southampton: University of Southampton.
Remondino, Fabio dan Campana, Stefano (eds.). 2014. 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: Theory and Best Practices. Oxford: BAR International Series.
Schmidt, Alke dan Wilson, Andrew T. 2021. Ethics in Digital Archaeology: Challenges of Data Ownership and Representation. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 21: e00187.
Smith, Claire. 2017. Archaeological Theory and Digital Practice. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(3): 950–966.
Sullivan, Elaine dan Schneider, Thomas. 2020. Archaeology in the Age of Big Data: Experiments in the Use of Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 8(2): 104–118.
Wheatley, David dan Gillings, Mark. 2002. Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS. London: Taylor & Francis.
Zubrow, Ezra B. W. 2006. Digital Archaeology: A Historical Context. In Digital Archaeology, ed. Thomas, Julian dan Chippindale, Christopher. London: Routledge.
