EPIGRAFI INDONESIA DALAM KERANGKA PIKIR PASCA - MODERNISME
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The interest in studying inscriptions as a source of history in Indonesia has been ingrained since the beginning of the XIX century. This is evidenced by the publication of the book The History of Java in 1817. The author, Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, the governor-general of England set aside two chapters of his book to discuss and classify several inscriptions, both in Old Javanese and Sanskrit. Even though Raffles' study cannot be called scientific, at least he has tried to give meaning to the traced remains that he knows. It can be said that Raffles was the first to make use of this written legacy to share the history of Java.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bahn, Paul & Colin Renfrew. , 1991., Archaeology:theories, methods, and practice . London : Thames and Hudson.
Bakker, J.W.M., 1972. , Ilmu prasasti Indonesia Yogyakarta: Jur. Sejarah Budaya IKIP Sanata Dharma.
Boechari. , 1977. , Epigrafi dan Sejarah Indonesia . Majalah Arkeologi I no. 1. Hlm. 1-31.
Boechari, 1978a., Bahan kajian arkeologi untuk pengajaran sejarah. Majalah Arkeologi II no. 1 Sept 1978. Him. 3- 26
Boechari, 1978b. Catalan tentang istilah amgati apus . Majalah Arkeologi I, no. 3 Januari 1978. Him. 54-59
Buchari, 1967/ 1968. Rakryan Mahamantri I Hino. A study on the highest court dignitary of ancient Java up to the 13th century AD. Journal of the Historical Society University of Singapore. Him . 7-20
Casparis,J.G.de.,1 986., The evolution of the socio-economic status of the East-Javanese village and its inhabitants, dalam Sartono Kartodirjo (ed.) Papers of the Fourth Indonesia n-Dutch History Conference Yogyakarta 24-29 July 1983. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Him. 3-24.
Christie, Jan Wisseman. 1993. Tra de and value in pre-Majapahit Java. Indonesian Circle no. 59&60. Him. 3-17.
Hodder, Ian., 1991 a. Post-modernism, post-structuralism, and post processual archaeology, dalam Ian Hodder (ed.) The Mean ing of Things. London: Harper-Collins. Him. 64-78.
Hodder, Ian., 1991 b. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, Ian., 1991c.,lnterpre tive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity vol. 56 (1) January 1991 . Him. 7-18.
Malina, J. & Z. Vasicek. ,1990.,Archaeology Yesterday and Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melas, E .M. 1991. Ethics, emics, and empathy in archaeological theories , dalam Ian Hodder (ed.) The Meaning of Things. London : Harper Collins. Him. 1 37-1 55.
Nastiti,Titi Surti. ,1985. Metode Penelitian Naskah Jaman Klasik. Makalah disajikan dalam Rapat Evaluasi Metode Penelitian Arkeologi 11, Mei. Panitia Analisis Sumber Tertulis Masa Klasik. 1991. Sinopsis Analisis $umber Tertulis Masa Klasik.
Poerbatjaraka., 1952., Riwayat Indonesia I. Djakarta: Pembangunan
Suhadi, Machi.,1978., Penelitian prasasti di Indonesia. Lokakarya Arkeologi 1978. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional. Him. 61-70.
Suhadi, Machi., 1982. Sedikit tinjauan tentang struktur pemerintahan Zaman Sindok dan Zaman Majapahit. PIA II 1977. Him. 295-331
Wirjosuparto, Sutjipto., 1978., Adakah biandn dan poliandri di Indonesia ?. Majalah Arkeologi I no. 4 Maret 1978. Hlm. 55-67
Tanudirjo, Daud Aris., 1991., Theoretical trends in Indonesian archaeology A paper presented in the Theoretical Archaeology Group Southampton December 1991
Tanudirjo, Daud Aris., 1993. Arkeologi Indonesia masa depan: Multilinier atau Unilinier? . Makalah disajikan dalam EHPA di Kaliurang, Juli.
Thomas, David Hurst. 1989. Archaeology. Forthworth: Holt, Rinehard and Winston
Wibowo,A.S.,1976., Riwayat penyelidikan prasasti di Indonesia dalam Satyawati Suleiman
(ed.) 50 Tahun Lembaga Purbakala 1913-1963. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional. Him. 60-103
