ANALISIS PERTANGGALAN PRASASTI WANUA TENGAH III
Main Article Content
Abstract
Inscription as a written source has a very high quality to reconstruct ancient history, because from its contents it can provide an overview of various things that were contemporaneous with the writing of the inscription. Even so, the inscription, like other historical sources, also needs to be tested for the credibility of its contents before being used as material for historical writing. The test in question is through external and internal criticism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Boechari. 1977 "Epigrafi dan Sejarah Indonesia", Majalah Arkeologi, I, no.2, him. 1-38.
Damais LC 1 955. ''Etudes d'Epigraphie lndonesienne IV. Discussion de la Date des lnscnptions", BEFEO, tome XLVII, 7 - 290.
Djoko Dwiyanto, 1986. "Pengamatan terhadap Data Keselarahan dari Prasasti Wanua Tengah Ill Tahun 908 M", Pertemuan llmiah Arkeologi V (Ila. Aspek Sosial-Budaya). Jakarta, hal. 92 - 110.
Kusen, 1984. "Temuan Baru dari Temanggung: Prasasti Raja Balitung 830 C", Kompas (Minggu, 6 Mei) hal. IX.
Trigangga, 1993. Penggunaan Komputer untuk Epigrafi.· Perkiraan Pertanggalan Prasasti Tugu (belum diterbitkan).