EMAS DAN TANAH: KASUS PENGUASAAN SUMBER-SUMBER EKONOMI DI SUMATERA DAN JAWA PADA ABAD VII-X MASEHI (KAJIAN PRASASTI-PRASASTI MASA SRIWIJAYA DAN MATARAM KUNA)

Main Article Content

Nurhadi Rangkuti

Abstract


Inscriptions are sources of past history written on stone or metal. Most of these inscriptions were issued by order of kings or rulers, generally containing the number of years, lists of high royal officials, construction of holy buildings, establishment of perdikan (sima), religions, curses, court decisions, social organizations and religious organizations. As the ruling medium, inscriptions were used to announce the regulations, powers and decisions of the rulers relating to the political-economic interests of the rulers at that time. The subject matter in this paper is, to what extent the inscriptions as the media for the rulers convey and imply the policies of the rulers in political-economic interests at that time? Are there transparent differences in the strategy of control and regulation of economic resources, of the two civilizations that have different economic resources? From the comparison of the contents of the Srivijaya era inscriptions (VII century AD) and Old Mataram inscriptions (IX-X century AD), it appears that there are differences in the way of controlling the economic resources of the two kingdoms.


Article Details

How to Cite
Rangkuti, N. (2024). EMAS DAN TANAH: KASUS PENGUASAAN SUMBER-SUMBER EKONOMI DI SUMATERA DAN JAWA PADA ABAD VII-X MASEHI (KAJIAN PRASASTI-PRASASTI MASA SRIWIJAYA DAN MATARAM KUNA). Berkala Arkeologi , 14(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v14i2.716
Section
Articles

References

Boechari. (1977). Epigrafi dan Sejarah Indonesia. Majalah Arkeologi Th I No: 2 November 1997. Jakarta: Fakultas Sastra UI.

Boechari. (1980). Candi dan Lingkungannya. Pertemuan llmiah Arkeologi, Cibulan, 21-25 Februari 1977. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Christie, J.W. (1989). Raja dan Rama: Negara Klasik Awal di Jawa. Dalam Pusat, Simbol, dan Hirarki Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Coedes, G. dan L-Ch. Damais. (1989). Kedatuan Sriwijaya: Penelitian tentang Sriwijaya. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Cottrell, F. (1955). Energy and Society: The Relation Between Energy Social Change, and Economic Development. New York-Toronto-London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

Fitriati, R. (1990). Pasak-pasak dari Masa Balitung dan Sindok. Dalam Monumen: Karya Persembahan untuk Prof. Dr. R. Soekmono hlm. 102-104. Depok: Lembaran Sastra FS-UI.

Geertz, C. (1974). lnvolusi Pertanian Proses Perubahan Ekologi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara.

Kartakusuma, R. (1993). Dapunta Hiyam Sri Jayanasa: Kajian atas makna dari prasasti Telaga Batu. Amerta No: 13. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

van der Meulen, W.J. (1988). Indonesia di Ambang Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Miksic, J.N. (1984). Penganalisaan Wilayah dan Pertumbuhan Kebudayaan Tinggi di Sumatra Selatan. Berkala Arkeologi, 5(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v5i1.263

Nastiti, T.S., Dewi, D.W., dan Kartakusuma, R. (1982). Tiga Prasasti dari Masa Balitung. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Nastiti, T.S. (1982a). Hak Milik Atas Tanah. MISI Jilid XI No.01 Juni 1982. Jakarta: Fakultas Sastra Universitas Indonesia.

Nastiti, T.S. (1982b). Masalah Hak Milik Atas Tanah Abad 9 dan 10 Masehi. Amerta. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Rangkuti, N. (1989) Struktur Kota Sriwijaya di Daerah Palembang". Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi V, Yogyakarta 4-7 Juli 1989. Jakarta: lkatan Ahli Arkeologi Indonesia.

Sartono. (1984). Emas di Sumatera Kala Purba. Amerta No. 8. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional.

Sumadio, B. (ed.). (1984). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia II. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.