COMPARATIVE pH ANALYSIS: HOMEMADE COLD CLAY VERSUS COMMERCIAL CLAY FOR CHILD SAFETY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cold clay, as a non-baking children's play medium, needs to be assessed for its chemical and physical safety, particularly its pH parameters, to ensure safety for children's skin and environmental sustainability. This study aims to characterize the pH of cold clay by comparing homemade and manufactured products. A total of six samples were tested: one homemade (based on polyvinyl acetate, cornstarch, and additives) and five manufactured, colorful ones. The pH measurements were performed using a digital pH meter with three replications, then statistically analyzed using an independent t-test. The results showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the two groups. Homemade samples had an average pH of 4.75 ± 0.06 (acidic), while manufactured samples ranged from 7.16–7.53 (neutral to slightly alkaline). From a dermatological perspective, homemade pH, which is closer to the natural pH of children's skin (~5.5), is considered safer for long-term contact because it does not disrupt the acid mantle. In contrast, the neutral pH of manufactured products showed better chemical stability but potentially poses challenges in waste management. These findings emphasize the importance of pH characterization in selecting safe materials for the intended application. The study recommends consideration of pH parameters for parents, educators, and industry, as well as the need for further studies on toxicity and environmental impacts to ensure overall safety.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b). Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Behm, B., Kemper, M., Babilas, P., Abels, C., & Schreml, S. (2015). Impact of a Glycolic Acid-Containing pH 4 Water-in-Oil Emulsion on Skin pH. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 28(6), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439030
Blume-Peytavi, U., Lavender, T., Jenerowicz, D., Ryumina, I., Stalder, J. F., Torrelo, A., & Cork, M. J. (2016). Recommendations from a European Roundtable Meeting on Best Practice Healthy Infant Skin Care. Pediatric Dermatology, 33(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12819
Chookah, H. A., Agbenyega, J. S., Santos, I. M., & Habak, C. (2024). Play Affordances of Natural and Non-natural Materials in Preschool Children’s Playful Learning Tasks. International Journal of Early Childhood, 56(3), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00348-z
Kim, T. K. (2013). Statistics and Probability. Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Table 2, 2215–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_101087
Kuo, S. H., Shen, C. J., Shen, C. F., & Cheng, C. M. (2020). Role of pH value in clinically relevant diagnosis. Diagnostics, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10020107
Lambers, H., Piessens, S., Bloem, A., Pronk, H., & Finkel, P. (2006). Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 28(5), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.2006.00344.x
Marsuki, U., Damayanti, E., & Kusyairy, U. (2022). Peningkatan Perkembangan Motorik Halus Melalui Permainan Paper Clay Pada Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun. PELANGI: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Islam Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.52266/pelangi.v4i1.732
Mendes, B. R., Shimabukuro, D. M., Uber, M., & Abagge, K. T. (2016). Critical assessment of the pH of children’s soap. Jornal de Pediatria, 92(3), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.08.009
Oktavianto, E., Lesmana, T. W. I., Timiyatun, E., & Badi’ah, A. (2019). Pelatihan Bermain Pada Pengasuh Meningkatkan Parenting Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 6(1), 523. https://doi.org/10.35842/jkry.v6i1.294
Panther, D. J., & Jacob, S. E. (2015). The importance of acidification in atopic eczema: An underexplored avenue for treatment. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 4(5), 970–978. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4050970
Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER). (2012). Opinion on tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate (TCEP) in toys. March. https://doi.org/10.2772/44937
Siregar, R., Purnama, S., & Lakswinar, S. (2017). Profile of skin pH in leukaemia’s children with chemotherapy treatments at haji adam malik general hospital, Medan. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 5(7), 945–947. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.178
Syafira, N. I. Y. (2021). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 melalui Permainan Playdough dari Tepung. Jumat Pendidikan: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(3), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.32764/abdimaspen.v2i3.1951
