Peer-reviewers follow scientific papers review guidelines and fill scientific paper evaluation forms from editors.
A scientific paper is being reviewed for its substance and not for the diction, punctuation marks or mistype.
The principles of truth, novelty and originality are guaranteed; the benefit of scientific papers for science, technology and innovation is being put as the main concern and the impact of the writings to development of knowledge and science is understood (see 3.5.5 and 5.2.1).
The authors’ or third parties’ suggestions are taken into consideration to make an objective recommendation result.
The process is free from any influence based on friendship, competition or work relation which can lead to a subjective recommendation result.
The process is free from any religious, political, national, gender-based, or commercial consideration and other influences which can lead to a subjective recommendation result.
The findings in a scientific paper are kept confidential until it is published.
